what a way to make money! kills someone and sue the estate for Post traumatic stress!

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
link

Jury awards $4.3 million to estate of Metro-North worker
March 10, 2007

BRIDGEPORT, Conn. --A federal jury has awarded more than $4.3 million to the estate of a Metro-North Railroad worker who died when an engine ran over him in the Stamford rail yard three years ago.

Robert Ard Jr., 46, of Fairfield was crushed during a car-switching operation on March 10, 2004. The co-worker who backed up the engine said Ard informed him by radio that he could make the move, although no other Metro-North employee heard that transmission.

A jury in U.S. District Court in Bridgeport awarded $4,344,053 to Ard's estate in a decision late Thursday.

The jury determined that Metro-North and its managers failed to properly supervise the yard crews and enforce safety rules, said Charles C. Goetsch, the attorney who represented Ard's estate along with George J. Cahill Jr.

Nancy Ledy-Gurren, a New York City lawyer who represented Metro-North, could not be reached for comment Friday or early Saturday. Information was not available about whether the railroad company planned to appeal the verdict.

Testimony presented during the trial showed that Ard, who had two daughters, was killed as third-shift workers were lining up trains for the morning commuter run to Manhattan's Grand Central terminal.

Ard, a 28-year veteran assistant conductor, was part of a three-man yard crew. However, the conductor left the crew to work on another move while the engineer backed up the train that struck Ard, according to the testimony.

His body was discovered near the track after co-workers lost radio contact with him.

Phillip Waisonovitz, the engineer who backed up the engine, became distraught after learning it had struck Ard. He has been out of work on disability since then with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder.

Waisonovitz has filed suit against the railroad company and Ard's estate. That case is pending.





So the guy kills a co-worker. then gets distraught over it so he sues? ok i understand the railroad company BUT why sue the estate of the dead guy? WTF did he do?

 

meltdown75

Lifer
Nov 17, 2004
37,548
7
81
killing a co-worker and accidentally running him over... not really the same eh... i know the end result is the same, but come on now.
 

Chaotic42

Lifer
Jun 15, 2001
33,946
1,123
126
We *need* some serious tort reform. It needs to be very difficult to sue someone.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: meltdown75
killing a co-worker and accidentally running him over... not really the same eh... i know the end result is the same, but come on now.

just because it is a accident does not mean he did not kill him.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: Citrix
wow, thats strange.... i fail to see how the railroad is at fault.

they should have had more supervision. if doing something so dangerous they should have had safety precautions.

i can kinda understand the lawsuit against the railroad.
 

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,804
46
91
Originally posted by: waggy
link

Jury awards $4.3 million to estate of Metro-North worker
March 10, 2007

BRIDGEPORT, Conn. --A federal jury has awarded more than $4.3 million to the estate of a Metro-North Railroad worker who died when an engine ran over him in the Stamford rail yard three years ago.

Robert Ard Jr., 46, of Fairfield was crushed during a car-switching operation on March 10, 2004. The co-worker who backed up the engine said Ard informed him by radio that he could make the move, although no other Metro-North employee heard that transmission.

A jury in U.S. District Court in Bridgeport awarded $4,344,053 to Ard's estate in a decision late Thursday.

The jury determined that Metro-North and its managers failed to properly supervise the yard crews and enforce safety rules, said Charles C. Goetsch, the attorney who represented Ard's estate along with George J. Cahill Jr.

Nancy Ledy-Gurren, a New York City lawyer who represented Metro-North, could not be reached for comment Friday or early Saturday. Information was not available about whether the railroad company planned to appeal the verdict.

Testimony presented during the trial showed that Ard, who had two daughters, was killed as third-shift workers were lining up trains for the morning commuter run to Manhattan's Grand Central terminal.

Ard, a 28-year veteran assistant conductor, was part of a three-man yard crew. However, the conductor left the crew to work on another move while the engineer backed up the train that struck Ard, according to the testimony.

His body was discovered near the track after co-workers lost radio contact with him.

Phillip Waisonovitz, the engineer who backed up the engine, became distraught after learning it had struck Ard. He has been out of work on disability since then with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder.

Waisonovitz has filed suit against the railroad company and Ard's estate. That case is pending.





So the guy kills a co-worker. then gets distraught over it so he sues? ok i understand the railroad company BUT why sue the estate of the dead guy? WTF did he do?

uh, he died...if he hadn't died, he wouldn't have had PTSD
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: waggy
link

Jury awards $4.3 million to estate of Metro-North worker
March 10, 2007

BRIDGEPORT, Conn. --A federal jury has awarded more than $4.3 million to the estate of a Metro-North Railroad worker who died when an engine ran over him in the Stamford rail yard three years ago.

Robert Ard Jr., 46, of Fairfield was crushed during a car-switching operation on March 10, 2004. The co-worker who backed up the engine said Ard informed him by radio that he could make the move, although no other Metro-North employee heard that transmission.

A jury in U.S. District Court in Bridgeport awarded $4,344,053 to Ard's estate in a decision late Thursday.

The jury determined that Metro-North and its managers failed to properly supervise the yard crews and enforce safety rules, said Charles C. Goetsch, the attorney who represented Ard's estate along with George J. Cahill Jr.

Nancy Ledy-Gurren, a New York City lawyer who represented Metro-North, could not be reached for comment Friday or early Saturday. Information was not available about whether the railroad company planned to appeal the verdict.

Testimony presented during the trial showed that Ard, who had two daughters, was killed as third-shift workers were lining up trains for the morning commuter run to Manhattan's Grand Central terminal.

Ard, a 28-year veteran assistant conductor, was part of a three-man yard crew. However, the conductor left the crew to work on another move while the engineer backed up the train that struck Ard, according to the testimony.

His body was discovered near the track after co-workers lost radio contact with him.

Phillip Waisonovitz, the engineer who backed up the engine, became distraught after learning it had struck Ard. He has been out of work on disability since then with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder.

Waisonovitz has filed suit against the railroad company and Ard's estate. That case is pending.





So the guy kills a co-worker. then gets distraught over it so he sues? ok i understand the railroad company BUT why sue the estate of the dead guy? WTF did he do?

uh, he died...if he hadn't died, he wouldn't have had PTSD

damn him for deing! how dare he allow someone to kill him?
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
We *need* some serious tort reform. It needs to be very difficult to sue someone.

That's not good. You don't want to erect barriers to people being made whole when they have been wronged. We need to bitch-slap the attorneys and plaintiffs who file frivolous lawsuits. ;)

Edit: And to answer Waggy's question - I'm guessing he's suing the estate because he claims the guy who got killed told him it was safe to make the move. So by his account of the events, it was the fault of the guy who died.
 

crystal

Platinum Member
Nov 5, 1999
2,424
0
0
Originally posted by: waggy
link

Jury awards $4.3 million to estate of Metro-North worker
March 10, 2007

BRIDGEPORT, Conn. --A federal jury has awarded more than $4.3 million to the estate of a Metro-North Railroad worker who died when an engine ran over him in the Stamford rail yard three years ago.

Robert Ard Jr., 46, of Fairfield was crushed during a car-switching operation on March 10, 2004. The co-worker who backed up the engine said Ard informed him by radio that he could make the move, although no other Metro-North employee heard that transmission.

A jury in U.S. District Court in Bridgeport awarded $4,344,053 to Ard's estate in a decision late Thursday.

The jury determined that Metro-North and its managers failed to properly supervise the yard crews and enforce safety rules, said Charles C. Goetsch, the attorney who represented Ard's estate along with George J. Cahill Jr.

Nancy Ledy-Gurren, a New York City lawyer who represented Metro-North, could not be reached for comment Friday or early Saturday. Information was not available about whether the railroad company planned to appeal the verdict.

Testimony presented during the trial showed that Ard, who had two daughters, was killed as third-shift workers were lining up trains for the morning commuter run to Manhattan's Grand Central terminal.

Ard, a 28-year veteran assistant conductor, was part of a three-man yard crew. However, the conductor left the crew to work on another move while the engineer backed up the train that struck Ard, according to the testimony.

His body was discovered near the track after co-workers lost radio contact with him.

Phillip Waisonovitz, the engineer who backed up the engine, became distraught after learning it had struck Ard. He has been out of work on disability since then with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder.

Waisonovitz has filed suit against the railroad company and Ard's estate. That case is pending.





So the guy kills a co-worker. then gets distraught over it so he sues? ok i understand the railroad company BUT why sue the estate of the dead guy? WTF did he do?

Highline the answer for you.
 

Goosemaster

Lifer
Apr 10, 2001
48,775
3
81
Originally posted by: giantpinkbunnyhead
He's suing the estate because that's where the money is now.

and hopefully he loses and has to pay legal bills for eternity for being such a douchebag.
 

KLin

Lifer
Feb 29, 2000
29,809
314
126
I doubt the dead guy is going to mind being sued for money he can't spend. :p