If only there was some sort of decision about this in the past, and if only that decision was written down. If that were done, it might have gone something like this:
And then, if that had been done, maybe they would go into specific details in different sections. The details could possibly be written something like this:
among others.
Thank you. A lot of people seem to have forgotten the preamble to the constitution.
The founding fathers set up our government so that different parts of the government can put a check on other parts and so no one piece had full control of the country and people. This means that the states were closest stoke the people and were the “laboratories” of government policies and the federal government is the check on the states. The federal government, of course, was split into three main pieces that were to be a check on each other.
So when a state infringes on a persons rights or is a threat to the US, be it our democracy, people, or other states, it’s the federal government’s duty to put them in check. If anyone doubts that then they should revisit our history and remember that we actually tried a system of government that put a majority of the power in the hands of the states, do the articles of confederation ring a bell? Yeah, that system of government failed quickly.
However, the overarching duty of the federal government and state government for that matter, is to provide for the general welfare of its citizens and that’s a very broad umbrella of responsibility. So it’s odd to hear politicians talk about policies or ideas that directly contradict the preamble and the constitution and it’s even sadder when people support politicians who directly violate those goals.
It would be wise for us to remember our history.