- Feb 18, 2001
- 7,635
- 73
- 91
The subject of natural vice non-natural (Caesarean) births has fascinated me for a long time. Prior to 100 years ago there were no Caesarean births as this is a relative new procedure in human history. Fast forward to today and I hit paydirt on the subject:
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-38210837
The bottom-line conclusion for this article is that human evolution is being affected via Caesarean births:
"Without modern medical intervention such problems often were lethal and this is, from an evolutionary perspective, selection.
Women with a very narrow pelvis would not have survived birth 100 years ago. They do now and pass on their genes encoding for a narrow pelvis to their daughters."
Interesting ...
Your thoughts?
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-38210837
The bottom-line conclusion for this article is that human evolution is being affected via Caesarean births:
"Without modern medical intervention such problems often were lethal and this is, from an evolutionary perspective, selection.
Women with a very narrow pelvis would not have survived birth 100 years ago. They do now and pass on their genes encoding for a narrow pelvis to their daughters."
Interesting ...
Your thoughts?