- May 19, 2011
- 20,378
- 15,063
- 136

Wendy's denies plans for surge pricing after backlash
The fast food company says it has no plans to raise prices during busy periods.
www.bbc.co.uk
I thought I'd start a thread rather than potentially de-rail the Hume thread (once it started looking like it might turn into a discussion).
I know many here would be surprised for me to have a cynical take on this story, but I am somewhat sceptical of the idea that a company would pitch such a plan to its shareholders that was for any other reason than to earn more money in terms of immediate bottom line (e.g. surge pricing).
One might argue that *only* reducing prices at non-peak times would be a financial incentive to the consumer to help relieve the load at peak times, thereby reducing peak wait times. However, to pitch that plan to shareholders sounds an awful lot like, "we're having trouble with our workflow at peak times" which would subsequently draw an obvious criticism being, "fix your workflow so it handles peak times better". But since their pitch to shareholders apparently mentioned nothing of this kind of plan, I'm inclined to call a spade a spade and conclude that "dynamic pricing" really meant "surge pricing", and now they're backpedalling, or to use the popularly politically acceptable term, "clarifying".
Furthermore, decreasing prices at non-peak times (and/or possibly increasing them at peak times) would also logically draw a question of paying workers in a similarly variable manner at such times. Cost of doing business and all that. I'm not going to put a cynical spin on that point.