Well I wanted 939 but I am not paying for a $400 Athlon 64 3.5ghz CPU

Luthien

Golden Member
Feb 1, 2004
1,721
0
0
I was dissapointed to find out yesterday that the 939 will not have a lower end cpu to start with than the 3.5ghz. Unless it sells for $300 and under when the first 6800GT is available I wont be going with 939. All I can say is CRAP! When is the 6800GT pci-e comming out?
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
Originally posted by: BFG10K
Can I ask what this has to do with video?

CPU limited video cards wouldn't have a problem w/ a 3.5 ghz a64. Yeah, this is in the wrong forum.
 

Luthien

Golden Member
Feb 1, 2004
1,721
0
0
Well, the cpu is actaully $500 for the 3.5ghz 939 chipset starting cpu. No thanks. We need a 3.2 ghz at least as a lower option to get started in the 939 chipset. Spending over $300 on a cpu is a huge waste of money IMO these days and I would say under $200 is even better value as long as you get a good upgrade path. CRAP
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: Luthien
Well, the cpu is actaully $500 for the 3.5ghz 939 chipset starting cpu. No thanks. We need a 3.2 ghz at least as a lower option to get started in the 939 chipset. Spending over $300 on a cpu is a huge waste of money IMO these days and I would say under $200 is even better value as long as you get a good upgrade path. CRAP

Luthien,

Before anyone drags this on any further(dang knuckleheads! ;)), the Athlon64s go by a rating not the actual ghz. The Athlon64 3500+ runs at 2.2ghz.

*edit* corrected for proper ghz of a 3500+ :)
 
Apr 17, 2003
37,622
0
76
Originally posted by: Strk
Originally posted by: Luthien
Well, the cpu is actaully $500 for the 3.5ghz 939 chipset starting cpu. No thanks. We need a 3.2 ghz at least as a lower option to get started in the 939 chipset. Spending over $300 on a cpu is a huge waste of money IMO these days and I would say under $200 is even better value as long as you get a good upgrade path. CRAP

Luthien,

Before anyone drags this on any further(dang knuckleheads! ;)), the Athlon64s go by a rating not the actual ghz. The Athlon64 3500+ probably runs around 2.4ghz.

i believe the 3500+ is 2.2 ghz
 

Jeff7181

Lifer
Aug 21, 2002
18,368
11
81
Wow... Athlon's haven't been named by their actual clock speed in like 3 years... been out of the loop for a while eh? :)
 

hysperion

Senior member
May 12, 2004
837
0
0
luthien....the joke is on you....a64's are 2.4ghz .....not 3.5ghz :)....get the sarcasm?
3500+ is 2.2ghz
 

Luthien

Golden Member
Feb 1, 2004
1,721
0
0
yeah, lol but you all knew what I meant anyhow... do any of you know if they are going to release an athlon 3.2 anytime SOON for the 939 chipset?
 

Jeff7181

Lifer
Aug 21, 2002
18,368
11
81
Wait... now that you see your error... are you asking when a 3.2 GHz Athlon 64 is coming out? Or are you knowingly repeating your error and calling the Athlon 64 3200+ an Athlon 3.2?
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
Originally posted by: Jeff7181
Wait... now that you see your error... are you asking when a 3.2 GHz Athlon 64 is coming out? Or are you knowingly repeating your error and calling the Athlon 64 3200+ an Athlon 3.2?
 

caz67

Golden Member
Jan 4, 2004
1,369
0
0
Hi.

You guys in the US, get em cheap.

The new 64 3800 and 3700 retail for $830.00US and $760.00US.

Thats $1200.00 bucks aussie.

Didn't AMD used to offer budget price, great performance.???

NOT ANYMORE.

My 3.2EE cost less than that...LOL
 

Cerb

Elite Member
Aug 26, 2000
17,484
33
86
Originally posted by: caz67
Hi.

You guys in the US, get em cheap.

The new 64 3800 and 3700 retail for $830.00US and $760.00US.

Thats $1200.00 bucks aussie.

Didn't AMD used to offer budget price, great performance.???

NOT ANYMORE.

My 3.2EE cost less than that...LOL
That's what they can do when there's nothing from the competition, yet.
Anyway, it is still true:
Mobile 2400+: $77
Mobo: $53
...and OC.
Oh, and being in video, 9800 Pro: $210
:)