Well ain't he a Jolly Jackson: "I would 'slit my wrists' before hurting a child" -CNN

[ReiAyanami]

http://www.cnn.com/2003/SHOWBIZ/Music/12/26/jackson.interv.ap/index.html

somehow i don't think these comments will help his case

reminds me of mike tyson's: "i'm gonna eat your children"
"i'm taking prozac to keep me from killin' y'all"
"i didn't rape her but if i could i would"

 

[Twista]

0h well :/
hes human and things slip out your mouth.

 

[ReiAyanami]

these don't just slip out like "it's still ok for me to sleep with [other people's] children despite the pedohile allegations against me"

all it means is he's not fit to be a baby dangling father. he says his father physically abused him to make him a child star and often an abused child grows up to become an abuser

perhaps he's this pale from all the blood loss of slitting his wrists for the past 10 years

 

[Zim Hosein]

I'll pay for the razor!

 

[StageLeft]

Well the things tyson said were clearly violent in nature - violent towards others. Jackson's statement was really to the contrary, saying that he'd rather commit violence to himself than to a child. Tyson was probably being truthful with his statements, and it is possible that michael was at all. He's a nut job and a stupid one with things he does, like hosting that recent party, but it is indeed possible that he didn't abuse this child or any others.

 

[Kadarin]

Originally posted by: Skoorb
Well the things tyson said were clearly violent in nature - violent towards others. Jackson's statement was really to the contrary, saying that he'd rather commit violence to himself than to a child. Tyson was probably being truthful with his statements, and it is possible that michael was at all. He's a nut job and a stupid one with things he does, like hosting that recent party, but it is indeed possible that he didn't abuse this child or any others.

It's also possible that in his own mind he doesn't see it as violence or abuse towards children, but instead a "loving act". Who knows?

 

[Howard]

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: Skoorb
Well the things tyson said were clearly violent in nature - violent towards others. Jackson's statement was really to the contrary, saying that he'd rather commit violence to himself than to a child. Tyson was probably being truthful with his statements, and it is possible that michael was at all. He's a nut job and a stupid one with things he does, like hosting that recent party, but it is indeed possible that he didn't abuse this child or any others.

It's also possible that in his own mind he doesn't see it as violence or abuse towards children, but instead a "loving act". Who knows?

Indeed. Who knows?

Though I, for one, abhor people jumping to conclusions already, as if a higher, more just and infallible magistrate resided in their minds had already sentenced him...