werepossum
Elite Member
- Jul 10, 2006
- 29,873
- 463
- 126
As Outhouse says, this is Islam, not democracy. (And I doubt that those women raped in government rape houses, or whose sons and/or husbands were murdered by Saddam, or whose villages were gassed by Saddam, or whose livelihoods were destroyed by Saddam, would deny that they are now better off.)What Democracy,
women had more freedom under Sadaam
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/03/12-3
worse if you are gay
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/08/world/middleeast/08gay.html
http://travel.state.gov/law/citizenship/citizenship_774.html
Hell of a way to spread democracy by turning the clock backwards, turning women into second class citizens, force gays back in the closet while here we hypocritically push for gay marriage.
Iraq was an abysmal failure, except for the few that became filthy rich especially the haliburton types, trillions of tax dollars wasted that could have reinvigorated the economy and shore up infrastructure or at the very least paid off debt.
Self-determination is a basic human right, but there is no obligation that they satisfy our definition of correct behavior. If there was such an obligation, they wouldn't be free. Islam is a blight, no doubt, but they still deserve their chance to build a society and in the end, they will answer to G-d for their actions. Whether that is a god of death, duplicity and murder or a god of love and justice is a matter of faith, beyond our determination.