Try out Bell's theorem.
People don't understand Schrodinger's Cat experiment because Schrodinger intended it to show that you cannot apply quantum principles to macroscopic objects. The idea is that the cat CANNOT be both dead and alive. He intended the experiment to be a reductio ad absurdum.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum
http://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/experiments/schrodingerscat/
Did you miss post 24?Surprised there was no mention of magnets yet lol. How the fuck do they work?
Surprised there was no mention of magnets yet lol. How the fuck do they work?
People don't understand Schrodinger's Cat experiment because Schrodinger intended it to show that you cannot apply quantum principles to macroscopic objects. The idea is that the cat CANNOT be both dead and alive. He intended the experiment to be a reductio ad absurdum.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum
http://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/experiments/schrodingerscat/
But you can apply quantum principles to quantum objects right? Well the cat's life or death depends on the quantum object in the box with him.
I could tell you, but then it'd be different.What quantum object would that be?
What quantum object would that be?
The radioactive source, specifically the single atom that does or does not decay.What quantum object would that be?
Schrödinger's cat: a cat, a flask of poison, and a radioactive source are placed in a sealed box. If an internal monitor detects radioactivity (i.e. a single atom decaying), the flask is shattered, releasing the poison that kills the cat. The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics implies that after a while, the cat is simultaneously alive and dead. Yet, when one looks in the box, one sees the cat either alive or dead, not both alive and dead. This poses the question of when exactly quantum superposition ends and reality collapses into one possibility or the other.
