• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Weird 3dmark scores with Win2kpro

CooCoo18

Member
i just benchmarked my computer with 3dmark2001... I have a duel boot with partition magic (on different HD's) of win98se/win2kPRO. i did a benchmark of both these OS's and it appears that win98SE is faster by a WHOLE lot. I have the exact same video drivers (det's 12.90's), via 4n1's (32 ver.), and all the windows updates on both OS's. now i ran the test on default settings for Win2kPro and i was only getting 1409, but then i did the same test at default settings on win98SE and i got 3414... i tired this test a number of times so its not just a fluke. Am i doing something wrong here? I read somewhere that Win98SE is about 5% faster than win2kPro but its a 2000 point difference we are talking here! Anyways i have checked device manager and i made sure all the drivers were installed and they are working well.. Has anyone else tried this and got similiar results with win2kpro lagging behind??? Thx in advance

Specs
1.2 ghz tbird
Geforce 2 pro 32MB
IWill KK266
Creative PCDVD 12x w/DXr3
256 PC133 Cas3 RAM

 
i *think* i remember my win2k scores jumping up when i installed dx8, did you try that? the only other thing i thought of is to make sure you have the 4in1's installed in win2k also (you have to do it for each OS), but you said you did that already...
 
Back
Top