Week 8 Fantasy Football

[49erinnc]

My issues:

N. Washington @ Oakland OR L. Coles @ Cleveland?

Coles has been banged up and was very mediocre last week. And Cleveland's Defense isn't all that bad. Nate has become an appealing target in the Pitt offense. I just hate for this to be the week I bench Coles and he goes off.

And:

Favre vs Zona OR Grossman vs San Fran?

Hasselbeck is my starter but with him out, I acquired Grossman off free agency this week because he has some favorable matchups coming up. However, I'm not sure if he's the better play this week. I think Favre could put up big numbers but just not sure who to go with.

 

[ModeEngage]

Man, you gotta go with Coles and Grossman here. Cleveland's defense is pretty bad, and Big Ben just took a serious shot last week, so you can't trust him to be 100% throwing to Washington.

How about this? Reggie Wayne @ Denver or Mushin Muhammad @ SF.

 

[LordSnailz]

Any suggestions with my WR positions? Those are the best I got unfortunately, maybe I can pick someone up, doubtful this late in the game though.
Bryant Johnson - Cards vs Packers
Joey Galloway - Bucs vs Giants
Deion Branch - Seahawks vs KC
Marques Colston - NO vs Ravens

 

[wyvrn]

Originally posted by: 49erinnc
My issues:

N. Washington @ Oakland OR L. Coles @ Cleveland?

Coles has been banged up and was very mediocre last week. And Cleveland's Defense isn't all that bad. Nate has become an appealing target in the Pitt offense. I just hate for this to be the week I bench Coles and he goes off.

And:

Favre vs Zona OR Grossman vs San Fran?

Hasselbeck is my starter but with him out, I acquired Grossman off free agency this week because he has some favorable matchups coming up. However, I'm not sure if he's the better play this week. I think Favre could put up big numbers but just not sure who to go with.

Grossman and Coles. Coles is a good receiver and I have learned not to bench the studs because you don't know when they'll have their biggest game of the season. Washington is a 2nd guy, not a starter, so odds are he'll give you medium stuff every week.

 

[jlbenedict]

Check FA and see if Leon Washington is available.
He's the goto man this week against Cleveland. Had a nice game against Detroit last week.

My advice is only if you are struggling at the RB spot, and are desperate for points, or have your stud in a bye week.

 

[ModeEngage]

Originally posted by: LordSnailz
Any suggestions with my WR positions? Those are the best I got unfortunately, maybe I can pick someone up, doubtful this late in the game though.
Bryant Johnson - Cards vs Packers
Joey Galloway - Bucs vs Giants
Deion Branch - Seahawks vs KC
Marques Colston - NO vs Ravens

Colston is a starter every week. Drew Brees has a man-crush on him and he gets tons of looks, especially in the Red Zone. Bryant Johnson should light up a bad Packers secondary. Seneca Wallace (SEA quarterback) should look almost exclusively at short-to-medium routes, Deion Branch's possesion receiver specialty.

Joey Galloway is very hit or miss, I'd bench him this week.

 

[Phokus]

question: how come my team is 3-4?

Oh that's right, my team sucks >_<

 

[EPCrew]

I'm trying to fill WR and WR/RB. Which combo do you think I should go for?

My options are...

DeShaun Foster RB @ DAL
Key Johnson WR @ DAL
Laurance Maroney RB @ MIN
M Colston WR @ BAL
M Muhammed WR @ SF

Right now, I have Foster/Johnson. I don't think Moose is going to put up big numbers as they are going to continue to run over SF. Colston has a difficult matchup. So really, I'm thinking Foster or Maroney, and Key or Moose.

 

[49erinnc]

Originally posted by: EPCrew
I'm trying to fill WR and WR/RB. Which combo do you think I should go for?

My options are...

DeShaun Foster RB @ DAL
Key Johnson WR @ DAL
Laurance Maroney RB @ MIN
M Colston WR @ BAL
M Muhammed WR @ SF

Right now, I have Foster/Johnson. I don't think Moose is going to put up big numbers as they are going to continue to run over SF. Colston has a difficult matchup. So really, I'm thinking Foster or Maroney, and Key or Moose.

Aside from Dillon's big 2-TD game, Maroney has put up very good numbers. My only concern is that Brady is starting to develop relationships with his receivers and I think they'll start throwing more. With that said, I still like Maroney. While Tiki was able to run over the Cowboys, Foster simply doesn't have as much talent to do that against a very good run defense. I look for the Panthers to attack through the air most of the night. If I had to lean, I'd go with Maroney/Key. Keep in mind this is Key's old team and he'll be looking to make a statement. Also, Roy Williams will try to lock down Steve Smith, which should leave Keyshawn open for a scoring opportunity or two.

 

[49erinnc]

Originally posted by: n30
Man, you gotta go with Coles and Grossman here. Cleveland's defense is pretty bad, and Big Ben just took a serious shot last week, so you can't trust him to be 100% throwing to Washington.

How about this? Reggie Wayne @ Denver or Mushin Muhammad @ SF.

I'll probably go with Coles but still not sure about Grossman. His performance against the Cards was pathetic but I don't expect another game like that from him. I just think this could be a big week for Favre, who does put up good fantasy numbers actually. He's good for 1-2 INT's but that doesn't hurt me much if he throws for 300+/2-3 TD's.

As for your dilemma, I like Wayne. Denver's defense is stout but it's a run-defense. They can and will give up big plays in the air and Manning can certainly take advantage of that. I'm not suggesting Moose won't have a good game but for me, it's just one of those situations where you gotta play the best player. With that said, keep an eye on the weather in Denver. I heard they're calling for possible snow for that game. If that's the case, the passing game could be limited a bit but it shouldn't affect Manning too much.

And for LordSnailz: I'd definitely go with Colston and Johnson. The Green Bay/SF should be an air assault, resulting in big plays, lots of yards and several TD's. I think Johnson will have a big day in a high scoring affair. Colston is the better option of the remaining guys. I love Branch (and have him on my team) but I can't bring myself to start him with Wallace behind center. Not until after this week when I have a better idea of what to expect.

 

[EPCrew]

Originally posted by: 49erinnc

Originally posted by: EPCrew
I'm trying to fill WR and WR/RB. Which combo do you think I should go for?

My options are...

DeShaun Foster RB @ DAL
Key Johnson WR @ DAL
Laurance Maroney RB @ MIN
M Colston WR @ BAL
M Muhammed WR @ SF

Right now, I have Foster/Johnson. I don't think Moose is going to put up big numbers as they are going to continue to run over SF. Colston has a difficult matchup. So really, I'm thinking Foster or Maroney, and Key or Moose.

Aside from Dillon's big 2-TD game, Maroney has put up very good numbers. My only concern is that Brady is starting to develop relationships with his receivers and I think they'll start throwing more. With that said, I still like Maroney. While Tiki was able to run over the Cowboys, Foster simply doesn't have as much talent to do that against a very good run defense. I look for the Panthers to attack through the air most of the night. If I had to lean, I'd go with Maroney/Key. Keep in mind this is Key's old team and he'll be looking to make a statement. Also, Roy Williams will try to lock down Steve Smith, which should leave Keyshawn open for a scoring opportunity or two.

Interesting. I agree with you about Key. Generally, I do like Maroney but he's going up against a somewhat goodrun defense as well. In addition to DAL having so many issues.

 

[EPCrew]

OK, Maroney it is for Monday Night Football!

 

[LordSnailz]

Thanks for the tips guys, I'll go with Coltson and Johnson over Branch and Galloway ... any suggestions for TE position? Jason Witten or Desmond Clark? I'm leaning towards Desmond since the Bears are playing the niners ... but I'm not sure.

 

[SirChadwick]

Good thread guys.

I need suggestions on these guys now that Hasselbeck is out for 3+ weeks.

Pennington v. Browns or Huard v. Seahawks- I think Damon is solid and will have a good week against and have him starting right now as my backup... Pennington should do alright, but the Browns passing defense isn't the worst. Who do I go with?

 

[SirChadwick]

Originally posted by: LordSnailz
Thanks for the tips guys, I'll go with Coltson and Johnson over Branch and Galloway ... any suggestions for TE position? Jason Witten or Desmond Clark? I'm leaning towards Desmond since the Bears are playing the niners ... but I'm not sure.

I think Clark is the sure choice here. He's more consistent and has produced more overall this year. He will flourish against SF and possibly score for you.

 

[jlbenedict]

Originally posted by: SirChadwick

Originally posted by: LordSnailz
Thanks for the tips guys, I'll go with Coltson and Johnson over Branch and Galloway ... any suggestions for TE position? Jason Witten or Desmond Clark? I'm leaning towards Desmond since the Bears are playing the niners ... but I'm not sure.

I think Clark is the sure choice here. He's more consistent and has produced more overall this year. He will flourish against SF and possibly score for you.

But, here is another way you could look at it:

Witten will now have Romo behind center. Bledsoe has a fetish for T. Glenn and will not even give any of his other receivers as many opportunities as Glenn.

1) With Romo behind center, things change. Romo has more mobility than Bledsoe. Therefore, Dallas might not have to keep Witten back to pass protect "as much" as with Bledsoe behind center.

2) Romo doesn't have a fetish for any particular receiver. He will check off the routes, and throw the ball to whoever is open; whether that is Glenn, Owens, Witten.. you get the idea.

I think Witten could have a huge game. Of course, Dallas is going to run the ball and get Romo comfortable. But I think this game is a must-win for Dallas. Hopefully the coaching staff thinks the same as I do; they should come out guns slingin and not play so conservative.

 

[SirChadwick]

Originally posted by: jlbenedict

Originally posted by: SirChadwick

Originally posted by: LordSnailz
Thanks for the tips guys, I'll go with Coltson and Johnson over Branch and Galloway ... any suggestions for TE position? Jason Witten or Desmond Clark? I'm leaning towards Desmond since the Bears are playing the niners ... but I'm not sure.

I think Clark is the sure choice here. He's more consistent and has produced more overall this year. He will flourish against SF and possibly score for you.

But, here is another way you could look at it:

Witten will now have Romo behind center. Bledsoe has a fetish for T. Glenn and will not even give any of his other receivers as many opportunities as Glenn.

1) With Romo behind center, things change. Romo has more mobility than Bledsoe. Therefore, Dallas might not have to keep Witten back to pass protect "as much" as with Bledsoe behind center.

2) Romo doesn't have a fetish for any particular receiver. He will check off the routes, and throw the ball to whoever is open; whether that is Glenn, Owens, Witten.. you get the idea.

I think Witten could have a huge game. Of course, Dallas is going to run the ball and get Romo comfortable. But I think this game is a must-win for Dallas. Hopefully the coaching staff thinks the same as I do; they should come out guns slingin and not play so conservative.

I see your point, but Romo hasn't established his man crush yet... it's too soon. Give him a few games and watch him throw them all to TO. I think people are giving him credit prematurely. Sure he's mobile and showed us some moves in last weeks game, but he has much to prove. People are counting out Bledsoe already, unreal... he's got some left in him. I'm just saying Clark is the sure shot for 6+ pts, while you're risking only 2-3 with Witten since the chemistry between Romo and himself isn't there yet.

 

[jlbenedict]

Originally posted by: SirChadwick

Originally posted by: jlbenedict

Originally posted by: SirChadwick

Originally posted by: LordSnailz
Thanks for the tips guys, I'll go with Coltson and Johnson over Branch and Galloway ... any suggestions for TE position? Jason Witten or Desmond Clark? I'm leaning towards Desmond since the Bears are playing the niners ... but I'm not sure.

I think Clark is the sure choice here. He's more consistent and has produced more overall this year. He will flourish against SF and possibly score for you.

But, here is another way you could look at it:

Witten will now have Romo behind center. Bledsoe has a fetish for T. Glenn and will not even give any of his other receivers as many opportunities as Glenn.

1) With Romo behind center, things change. Romo has more mobility than Bledsoe. Therefore, Dallas might not have to keep Witten back to pass protect "as much" as with Bledsoe behind center.

2) Romo doesn't have a fetish for any particular receiver. He will check off the routes, and throw the ball to whoever is open; whether that is Glenn, Owens, Witten.. you get the idea.

I think Witten could have a huge game. Of course, Dallas is going to run the ball and get Romo comfortable. But I think this game is a must-win for Dallas. Hopefully the coaching staff thinks the same as I do; they should come out guns slingin and not play so conservative.

I see your point, but Romo hasn't established his man crush yet... it's too soon. Give him a few games and watch him throw them all to TO. I think people are giving him credit prematurely. Sure he's mobile and showed us some moves in last weeks game, but he has much to prove. People are counting out Bledsoe already, unreal... he's got some left in him. I'm just saying Clark is the sure shot for 6+ pts, while you're risking only 2-3 with Witten since the chemistry between Romo and himself isn't there yet.

In what league is Clark a sure thing for 6+ points?

I will let you in on one little fact: In Yahoo, competitive catagory, "head to head" leagues, Clark has 18 total fantasy points.

If you look at the single game log for Clark, he hasn't exactly been spectacular. His two best games were the first two of the season. His only touchdown was in Week 2 against Detroit. Since Week 2, his best game is a 4-catch, 61 yard effor against Arizona.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/482...elog;_ylt=AoElHrCs1IYPMmxBbfNOK2f.uLYF


If you are willing to settle for a couple of points here and there, then by all means.. use Clark.
But if you have been in the fantasy game a while, you'll learn that the TE position is pretty much crap most of the time. Its worth it to take a gamble once in a while.

 

[SirChadwick]

Originally posted by: jlbenedict

Originally posted by: SirChadwick

Originally posted by: jlbenedict

Originally posted by: SirChadwick

Originally posted by: LordSnailz
Thanks for the tips guys, I'll go with Coltson and Johnson over Branch and Galloway ... any suggestions for TE position? Jason Witten or Desmond Clark? I'm leaning towards Desmond since the Bears are playing the niners ... but I'm not sure.

I think Clark is the sure choice here. He's more consistent and has produced more overall this year. He will flourish against SF and possibly score for you.

But, here is another way you could look at it:

Witten will now have Romo behind center. Bledsoe has a fetish for T. Glenn and will not even give any of his other receivers as many opportunities as Glenn.

1) With Romo behind center, things change. Romo has more mobility than Bledsoe. Therefore, Dallas might not have to keep Witten back to pass protect "as much" as with Bledsoe behind center.

2) Romo doesn't have a fetish for any particular receiver. He will check off the routes, and throw the ball to whoever is open; whether that is Glenn, Owens, Witten.. you get the idea.

I think Witten could have a huge game. Of course, Dallas is going to run the ball and get Romo comfortable. But I think this game is a must-win for Dallas. Hopefully the coaching staff thinks the same as I do; they should come out guns slingin and not play so conservative.

I see your point, but Romo hasn't established his man crush yet... it's too soon. Give him a few games and watch him throw them all to TO. I think people are giving him credit prematurely. Sure he's mobile and showed us some moves in last weeks game, but he has much to prove. People are counting out Bledsoe already, unreal... he's got some left in him. I'm just saying Clark is the sure shot for 6+ pts, while you're risking only 2-3 with Witten since the chemistry between Romo and himself isn't there yet.

In what league is Clark a sure thing for 6+ points?

I will let you in on one little fact: In Yahoo, competitive catagory, "head to head" leagues, Clark has 18 total fantasy points.

If you look at the single game log for Clark, he hasn't exactly been spectacular. His two best games were the first two of the season. His only touchdown was in Week 2 against Detroit. Since Week 2, his best game is a 4-catch, 61 yard effor against Arizona.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/482...elog;_ylt=AoElHrCs1IYPMmxBbfNOK2f.uLYF


If you are willing to settle for a couple of points here and there, then by all means.. use Clark.
But if you have been in the fantasy game a while, you'll learn that the TE position is pretty much crap most of the time. Its worth it to take a gamble once in a while.

Our league settings reward 1 pt for every 10 yds and 6 pts per touchdown, so its not the default. I believe Clark has 35 pts total right now while Witten has 21. TE is a very iffy position and its anyones game any week. I have Chris Cooley and he was worthless for the first 5 weeks and then came out of the woodworks into the top 10. Personally I'd rather stick w/ Clark but if you like risks... you got it right, Witten is your high risk/high reward man. He has yet to score a TD so I guess he's due.