- Jun 5, 2000
- 36,410
- 616
- 126
Rocky Mountain News
This is total BS. a hat from a US law enforement agency is offensive??? having a sign on your truck that says "English speaking American" is offensive?? WTF is this country coming too? I find the mexican businesses with the garish 2 foot signs in spanish on their store windows offensive and i demand they take them down. :| :| :|
..."Arapahoe County has demanded that Gray, who works in the road and bridge department, stop wearing a ball cap with "U.S. Border Patrol" stitched on the front at work and completely cover a sign on the trailer attached to his pickup that advertises a lawn care business he runs on the side.
A letter from Gray's supervisor dated Nov. 10 said donning the hat was "reprehensible and discriminatory" against Hispanic co-workers. So was the sign, which, over the background of the U.S. flag, lists Gray's phone number and promotes work performed "by an English-speaking American."
Gray was ordered not to wear the hat at work and to cover the sign when parking at the workplace.
He offered a reasonable compromise, in our view. Gray no longer wears the hat. And he covered part of the sign, leaving the image of the flag and the phrase "English-speaking American" visible. And yet, the county has not backed down from its earlier termination threats. So Gray is also mulling a lawsuit.
There's no reason to fight this battle in court. The county is justified in enforcing a dress code - though the letter failed to cite that reasoning. And theatening to fire Gray for displaying the American flag? Please.
It's best for the two parties, and the public at large, if the county accepts Gray's offer and moves on."
This is total BS. a hat from a US law enforement agency is offensive??? having a sign on your truck that says "English speaking American" is offensive?? WTF is this country coming too? I find the mexican businesses with the garish 2 foot signs in spanish on their store windows offensive and i demand they take them down. :| :| :|
..."Arapahoe County has demanded that Gray, who works in the road and bridge department, stop wearing a ball cap with "U.S. Border Patrol" stitched on the front at work and completely cover a sign on the trailer attached to his pickup that advertises a lawn care business he runs on the side.
A letter from Gray's supervisor dated Nov. 10 said donning the hat was "reprehensible and discriminatory" against Hispanic co-workers. So was the sign, which, over the background of the U.S. flag, lists Gray's phone number and promotes work performed "by an English-speaking American."
Gray was ordered not to wear the hat at work and to cover the sign when parking at the workplace.
He offered a reasonable compromise, in our view. Gray no longer wears the hat. And he covered part of the sign, leaving the image of the flag and the phrase "English-speaking American" visible. And yet, the county has not backed down from its earlier termination threats. So Gray is also mulling a lawsuit.
There's no reason to fight this battle in court. The county is justified in enforcing a dress code - though the letter failed to cite that reasoning. And theatening to fire Gray for displaying the American flag? Please.
It's best for the two parties, and the public at large, if the county accepts Gray's offer and moves on."