weakest defense?

[memo]

Ok, so I have McNabb, Gannon, Bledsoe and Warner they are up against NYG, @Pit, Jac, and @Pit. Which should I start? I'm thinking maybe Bledsoe since Jac has a pretty weak coverage team, but McNabb is usually pretty decent against any team.

 

[jlarsson]

First off, I wouldn't start Warner nor Gannon until they can show they can play at a high level again (and even Bledsoe for that matter). I'd probably start McNabb, since he'll also get you rushing yards and touchdowns.

 

[memo]

yeah i just picked them up because they were on the waiver wire and there are alot of spot on my roster. bledsoe i think can turn it around depending on how the new recievers work out. Im just not sold on McNabb and any reciever other than TO. Sure McNabb may get 30 yards rushing but no touches can kill me.

 

[spanky]

mcnabb. i would start bledsoe if buffalo's o-line could protect him, but they suck.

 

[SpunkyJones]

Go with Mcnabb, he's the best of the bunch, he's some one you'd start regardless of the match up. Also cut Warner or Bledsoe, thats too many QB's on your bench. Your wasting 3 bench spots for 1 starting position. Go pick up a sleeper wr or rb.

 

[Eagle1Fox2]

mcnabb...giants are gonna suck bigtime this yr, and yes, sadly, i do like the giants

 

[trilks]

Originally posted by: SpunkyJones
Go with Mcnabb, he's the best of the bunch, he's some one you'd start regardless of the match up. Also cut Warner or Bledsoe, thats too many QB's on your bench. Your wasting 3 bench spots for 1 starting position. Go pick up a sleeper wr or rb.

yea, there is no need for 4 qbs, unless you can start 2. no sense in hanging on to 3 third-tier qbs.

and to answer your question, i'd go with mcnabb.

 

[TheAudit]

Do not start Warner.
He's got happy feet and fumble-itis.
And that o-line is BAD.

 

[NeoV]

Is this an 8 man league?

Start McNabb all year, don't look back