- Oct 17, 2010
- 22,021
- 3
- 76
Another story about British hackers performing cyber crimes! Who would have thought?
I haven't read any other stories about it recently...
We do.
I haven't read any other stories about it recently...
We do.
AMDZen
Lifer
- Apr 15, 2004
- 12,589
- 0
- 76
Only if you're living in someone else's house and won't leave. And then you have to be tried in civil court since its not really against the law, or something.
- Oct 17, 2010
- 22,021
- 3
- 76
Lonbjerg
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 4,419
- 0
- 0
You left out:
3. it's the real deal, but because you are either affiliated with the loosers in lulzsec, a member or a fan ot the loosers, you are posting false info to muddy the waters
AMDZen
Lifer
- Apr 15, 2004
- 12,589
- 0
- 76
I know, thats what I'm saying. For squatters you go one step further even, since its already proven they are guilty they still get to chill in those nice digs with no repercussions.
- Oct 17, 2010
- 22,021
- 3
- 76
AMDZen
Lifer
- Apr 15, 2004
- 12,589
- 0
- 76
Buwahahaha. See thats the issue with you brits. Even when you post exactly what I just said in different words, you don't get the point. Squatters rights.
Buwahahahaha
Any way, enough of that. Not like that one hasn't been done to death.
- Oct 17, 2010
- 22,021
- 3
- 76
So as I said, I'm right.
You claimed they were guilty.
I pointed out they were not guilty as they have squatters rights and so are not guilty of a crime as you stated below.
You return with no argument.
I was right.
guyver01
Lifer
- Sep 25, 2000
- 22,135
- 5
- 61
And therein is the problem.
SQUATTERS SHOULD HAVE NO RIGHTS
What about owners rights?
My house.
GTFO
- Oct 17, 2010
- 22,021
- 3
- 76
I'm not arguing for squatters rights, I'm simply stating the fact that in the UK we believe innocent until proven guilty and squatters (in the UK) are guilty of no crime until it is proven they have committed one.
AMDZen
Lifer
- Apr 15, 2004
- 12,589
- 0
- 76
Personally, I think we need squatters rights. Raper's rights too. Why should that man be thrown out of that innocent girl? He just needed someplace to keep his dick warm. If the women uses that tazer, or even worse (shock) a gun to defend herself. She should be the one to go to jail. Not that poor rapis ... I mean squatter who was just trying to find a warm place for his penis.
guyver01
Lifer
- Sep 25, 2000
- 22,135
- 5
- 61
Unlawful entry of private property
except in the UK... it defangs this common notion of privacy
AMDZen
Lifer
- Apr 15, 2004
- 12,589
- 0
- 76
Somehow in the UK breaking and entering isn't a crime. Just like rape. Rape is not a crime.
- Oct 17, 2010
- 22,021
- 3
- 76
I'm not arguing for squatters rights I'm simply stating the fact that you were wrong when you said that squatters in the UK are proven guilty of something and then let off.
That's a debate for another time and not related to the argument I am making.
- Oct 17, 2010
- 22,021
- 3
- 76
AMDZen
Lifer
- Apr 15, 2004
- 12,589
- 0
- 76
You missed the point. The difference is, if someone is in my house - they're guilty. And they'll never get the chance to defend themselves in the court of law because thats not going to be possible from the plot they occupy in the ground.
- Oct 17, 2010
- 22,021
- 3
- 76
OK...? How does that change the law in the UK and make your original statement correct. You were arguing about legality in the UK and whether we accept the statement innocent until proven guilty.
guyver01
Lifer
- Sep 25, 2000
- 22,135
- 5
- 61
Except it falls under Trespass To Land..
Trespass to land involves the "unjustifiable interference with land which is in the immediate and exclusive possession of another". It is not necessary to prove that harm was suffered to bring a claim, and is instead actionable per se.
Land is defined as the surface, subsoil, airspace and anything permanently attached to the land, such as houses.
Except The UK de-balls this with laws that allow Adverse possession - a process by which premises can change ownership and it falls under Hostile or adverse use of the property – The disseisor entered or used the land without permission.
Ummm no. Where did you get that from? It's the real deal? Sure it is, the cops don't even know who the fuck they caught.
I'm speculating that since:
He pissed off anonymous
They tracked him down and posted all his info
Then he was arrested, but as a member of lulzsec, not anonymous
That:
A. Anonymous set him up
B. The police needed a fall guy
These are fair and logical assumptions.
guyver01
Lifer
- Sep 25, 2000
- 22,135
- 5
- 61
- Oct 17, 2010
- 22,021
- 3
- 76
Wow.. Great argument, I see you won't be acknowledging that you were wrong and I was right in this argument then? Just posting images.
- Oct 17, 2010
- 22,021
- 3
- 76
Actually I'm generally arguing about the morality of owning guns, but I don't make erroneous statements like saying
"In America there is no innocent until proven guilty because people who have guns are proven guilty and then let off to go around shooting people" which is the exact same sentiment that AMDzen tried to express about squatters.
Lonbjerg
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 4,419
- 0
- 0
So in the states logic is surpassed by..laywers?
No wonder things go apeshit in you country.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 20K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 12K
-
Discussion Speculation: Zen 4 (EPYC 4 "Genoa", Ryzen 7000, etc.)- Started by Vattila
- Replies: 13K
-
Facebook
Twitter