I'm curious what you guys think. Here's the choices for OCing:
1. Clawhammer CG: Has full 1MB cache and can theoretically clock as high as the Newcastle cores
2. Newcastle: Half the cache, but with higher multiplier to achieve faster clocks given same FSB as Clawhammer.
Now the seemingly obvious choice is to go with the Clawhammer due to the extra cache, but due to the need of the higher FSB to achieve the equivilant clock, it may tax other components of the system (such as RAM)
Assumptions:
1:1 ratio is aim for the FSB/Memory clock
Watercooling will (hopefully) eliminate temp restraint for both
RAM capable of 250-260 MHz memory clock
1. Clawhammer CG: Has full 1MB cache and can theoretically clock as high as the Newcastle cores
2. Newcastle: Half the cache, but with higher multiplier to achieve faster clocks given same FSB as Clawhammer.
Now the seemingly obvious choice is to go with the Clawhammer due to the extra cache, but due to the need of the higher FSB to achieve the equivilant clock, it may tax other components of the system (such as RAM)
Assumptions:
1:1 ratio is aim for the FSB/Memory clock
Watercooling will (hopefully) eliminate temp restraint for both
RAM capable of 250-260 MHz memory clock