Neither of those billionaires were establishment Democrats. The theory is valid.
So what? That doesn't validate Moonbeam's assertion of speculation as fact.
Neither of those billionaires were establishment Democrats. The theory is valid.
Young voters are overwhelmingly Democratic Party voters. There's no way you can think that a depressed youth turnout isn't a huge problem for Democrats.
Those votes aren't nearly as significant as appealing to the other demographics I listed. Those *WILL* show up and vote and in numbers and in states that swing narrow EC margins.
This statement indicates that you do not understand what he is saying at all.We understand what he’s saying and what he’s saying is pretty stupid. We had two billionaires in the race and neither of them did well so that kind of blows away that theory.
I think if you read my post again you will see where I clearly state that the 1% are attempting to program us all, not just black people. The difference, IMO, is that it is very difficult to program any minority to vote Republican, which is what the 1% clearly prefers. Thus, they have to fall back on at least programming them to hate socialism, and as a result of that, hate Sanders/Warren. Why do Hispanics still prefer Sanders? I do not know. Maybe as a people, they have a predisposition for socialist policies that is harder to overcome? Maybe they are not as easily fooled by characterizations of the government working for them instead of against them as "free cookies."If "the 1%" really favor Biden then they would be trying to program us all, not just black people. Hispanics went for Sanders. Is he saying they aren't as easily programmed?
Black people feel a connection to Biden because he was Obama's VP. Also, older blacks heavily favor moderate candidates. It's just that simple.
It doesn’t dismiss it either.So what? That doesn't validate Moonbeam's assertion of speculation as fact.
This statement indicates that you do not understand what he is saying at all.
I think if you read my post again you will see where I clearly state that the 1% are attempting to program us all, not just black people. The difference, IMO, is that it is very difficult to program any minority to vote Republican, which is what the 1% clearly prefers. Thus, they have to fall back on at least programming them to hate socialism, and as a result of that, hate Sanders/Warren. Why do Hispanics still prefer Sanders? I do not know. Maybe as a people, they have a predisposition for socialist policies that is harder to overcome? Maybe they are not as easily fooled by characterizations of the government working for them instead of against them as "free cookies."
Yea, her attacks against Bloomberg went into retard territory, go ahead and make him as a candidate of big money but to claim he told a female employee to "kill it" in reference to her pregnancy was just full retard. You need to completely prove something like that vs the "I believe her" shit Warren threw out there.No way she backs bernie now after the way she's treated him. I used to respect her, but what a horrible person she has become.
Funny how those accusations will largely go ignored or forgotten now that Bloomberg is out of the race. Such a deplorable guy, but his money sure smells good.Yea, her attacks against Bloomberg went into retard territory, go ahead and make him as a candidate of big money but to claim he told a female employee to "kill it" in reference to her pregnancy was just full retard. You need to completely prove something like that vs the "I believe her" shit Warren threw out there.
You stand by your statement that if the 1% were trying to influence the electorate to vote against socialism then Bloomberg and Steyer would have done better? That makes no sense since both of them support lots of socialist policies.I stand by my statement. You guys are all feels.
Yea, her attacks against Bloomberg went into retard territory, go ahead and make him as a candidate of big money but to claim he told a female employee to "kill it" in reference to her pregnancy was just full retard. You need to completely prove something like that vs the "I believe her" shit Warren threw out there.
Ignored by whom? Is there some law against telling a woman to kill it? What do you suggest be done about this injustice?Funny how those accusations will largely go ignored or forgotten now that Bloomberg is out of the race. Such a deplorable guy, but his money sure smells good.
Young voters are overwhelmingly Democratic Party voters. There's no way you can think that a depressed youth turnout isn't a huge problem for Democrats.
I am sorry that the absolute truth hurts! But truth is truth! If the truth is sexist so be it!!It's not about being politically correct. It's about not being a sexist asshole and throwing around terms that reinforce sexist stereotypes.
The Bros will go nuts if Sanders loses, period.
Yes if it holds in November it's a problem. Why didn't Sanders bring it out for super Tuesday though?
I have always been skeptical of Sanders being able to bring out a huge influx of voters in that demographic because historically they just don't turn out. I have no doubt that Sanders could bring a higher percentage out than Biden, but how much higher is the key. I tend to think a lot of the strong Sanders supporters in that demographic were already the engaged voting types and that he isn't reaching that far into the larger bloc of them who are not.
I think it was for shock value only and in the end didn't help her at all. At least she could claim "hey! I, at least took down moneybags!". Moneybags does have issues, but in recent years he has been pouring a lot of his $ into Dem coffers.I don’t think that claim was there for you & I it was there for Women.
I was referring to the scurrilous innuendo used to weaken Bloomberg’s presidential ambitions, yet the desire to tap into his vast resources.Ignored by whom? Is there some law against telling a woman to kill it? What do you suggest be done about this injustice?
Funny how those accusations will largely go ignored or forgotten now that Bloomberg is out of the race. Such a deplorable guy, but his money sure smells good.
It's a tough sell for that story to be believable. He probably did say the wrong thing to women on occasion but for someone in his position to say that to a pregnant employee strains credibility IMHO.Ignored by whom? Is there some law against telling a woman to kill it? What do you suggest be done about this injustice?
It's a tough sell for that story to be believable. He probably did say the wrong thing to women on occasion but for someone in his position to say that to a pregnant employee strains credibility IMHO.
While I 100% believe that's true I'd hardly call Bloomberg a "frat boy" type.That's Wall Street culture to a 'T'. Making gross comments like that is how you prove that you fly above the corporate HR bullshit, no one tells you what to say. It's funny, I work with guys that have some status, but nothing at that level, and they go right up to the line with their frat boy bullshit, but they never fuckin cross it.
While I 100% believe that's true I'd hardly call Bloomberg a "frat boy" type.
The lesbian story sounds fun, should have told her you can get that straight girl "across the fence" with the application of a gushing facial.
I was referring to the scurrilous innuendo used to weaken Bloomberg’s presidential ambitions, yet the desire to tap into his vast resources.