- Feb 3, 2003
- 2,696
- 0
- 76
Originally posted by: sMiLeYz
the oracle of omaha himself
Originally posted by: Crimson
Its easy for a billionaire to say he is not paying enough in taxes.
Originally posted by: Crimson
Its easy for a billionaire to say he is not paying enough in taxes.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Crimson
Its easy for a billionaire to say he is not paying enough in taxes.
Hey, Crimy, where have ya been?
While it may be easy for Billionaires to say anything it is unusual for a Billionaire to speak up against fellow Rich folk.
Originally posted by: Jmman
Speaking of taxes, I still am amazed at the number of people here who believe that the more tax we pay the federal government, the better off we will be. What on God's green Earth has the federal government done that gives you the idea that they are better able to spend your money than you are? I personally do not want to finance cow flatulence studies or lifetime political hacks whose sole accomplishment in 50 years of political "service" is voting themselves a bigger paycheck. The only "service" most of us are getting is by being bent over by the government. Who says mind control is fiction......![]()
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: Jmman
Speaking of taxes, I still am amazed at the number of people here who believe that the more tax we pay the federal government, the better off we will be. What on God's green Earth has the federal government done that gives you the idea that they are better able to spend your money than you are? I personally do not want to finance cow flatulence studies or lifetime political hacks whose sole accomplishment in 50 years of political "service" is voting themselves a bigger paycheck. The only "service" most of us are getting is by being bent over by the government. Who says mind control is fiction......![]()
Taxes should at least cover the cost of government. Simply put, the current "Tax Cuts" are deferred Tax Increases. They are not "Tax Cuts" at all.
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: Jmman
Speaking of taxes, I still am amazed at the number of people here who believe that the more tax we pay the federal government, the better off we will be. What on God's green Earth has the federal government done that gives you the idea that they are better able to spend your money than you are? I personally do not want to finance cow flatulence studies or lifetime political hacks whose sole accomplishment in 50 years of political "service" is voting themselves a bigger paycheck. The only "service" most of us are getting is by being bent over by the government. Who says mind control is fiction......![]()
Taxes should at least cover the cost of government. Simply put, the current "Tax Cuts" are deferred Tax Increases. They are not "Tax Cuts" at all.
Meaning that the gov't spends WAY too much money. The Feds need to have their plate cleaned and sorted.
CkG
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: Jmman
Speaking of taxes, I still am amazed at the number of people here who believe that the more tax we pay the federal government, the better off we will be. What on God's green Earth has the federal government done that gives you the idea that they are better able to spend your money than you are? I personally do not want to finance cow flatulence studies or lifetime political hacks whose sole accomplishment in 50 years of political "service" is voting themselves a bigger paycheck. The only "service" most of us are getting is by being bent over by the government. Who says mind control is fiction......![]()
Taxes should at least cover the cost of government. Simply put, the current "Tax Cuts" are deferred Tax Increases. They are not "Tax Cuts" at all.
Meaning that the gov't spends WAY too much money. The Feds need to have their plate cleaned and sorted.
CkG
Matter of opinion.
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
What does Warren Buffet know about building a successful business? I would take Bush's accumen over Buffet any day of the week . . . on Mars.
EDIT: Hmm, OK Mars might be giving Bush too much credit . . .
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: Jmman
Speaking of taxes, I still am amazed at the number of people here who believe that the more tax we pay the federal government, the better off we will be. What on God's green Earth has the federal government done that gives you the idea that they are better able to spend your money than you are? I personally do not want to finance cow flatulence studies or lifetime political hacks whose sole accomplishment in 50 years of political "service" is voting themselves a bigger paycheck. The only "service" most of us are getting is by being bent over by the government. Who says mind control is fiction......![]()
Taxes should at least cover the cost of government. Simply put, the current "Tax Cuts" are deferred Tax Increases. They are not "Tax Cuts" at all.
Meaning that the gov't spends WAY too much money. The Feds need to have their plate cleaned and sorted.
CkG
Matter of opinion.
I'm sure most here would agree with what I said(to varying degrees though)
However your statements were also opinion. Tax-cuts are not defered increases - they might be in your opinion though. Also - IMO the gov't shouldn't spend more than it takes in rather than having taxes covering the cost of government. get it?It's a matter of perspective. We aren't here to serve the gov't - the gov't is there to serve us. Therefore they shouldn't spend more than we give them - not them make us pay more because of their spending.
CkG
Originally posted by: sandorski
No. Simple Economics: Spending + Interest(Deficit/Debt) > Cost
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: sandorski
No. Simple Economics: Spending + Interest(Deficit/Debt) > Cost
Doesn't have to equal increased taxes. Simple math. Figure it outI've already provided the answer.
CkG
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: sandorski
No. Simple Economics: Spending + Interest(Deficit/Debt) > Cost
Doesn't have to equal increased taxes. Simple math. Figure it outI've already provided the answer.
CkG
It will.
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: sandorski
No. Simple Economics: Spending + Interest(Deficit/Debt) > Cost
Doesn't have to equal increased taxes. Simple math. Figure it outI've already provided the answer.
CkG
It will.
Not if we actually FIX things
CkG
What a rarity on this board . . . a clear, concise and accurate assessment. If Bush is re-elected, it is highly unlikely we will do anything substantive about the unfunded liability in SS/Medicare and it is unlikely we will do much about the ridiculous excess in DOD spending. IMHO, Kerry will be better but I doubt there's much political will in either political party to "fix" the mess that Bush created.Taxes should at least cover the cost of government. Simply put, the current "Tax Cuts" are deferred Tax Increases. They are not "Tax Cuts" at all.
Originally posted by: Crimson
Its easy for a billionaire to say he is not paying enough in taxes.
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Info on companies owned by Buffet's Hathaway.
I pay my electric/heating bills to this man, bought some of his funiture, walk on his carpet, wear his underwear, and sometimes eat at his dairy treat places.
Seems like this guy is always in my wallet...it's no wonder dave likes this guy
CkG
