• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Warrant: CHP officer says stealing nude photos from female arrestees 'game' for cops

Oldgamer

Diamond Member
MARTINEZ -- The California Highway Patrol officer accused of stealing nude photos from a DUI suspect's phone told investigators that he and his fellow officers have been trading such images for years, in a practice that stretches from its Los Angeles office to his own Dublin station, according to court documents obtained by this newspaper Friday.

CHP Officer Sean Harrington, 35, of Martinez, also confessed to stealing explicit photos from the cellphone of a second Contra Costa County DUI suspect in August and forwarding those images to at least two CHP colleagues. The five-year CHP veteran called it a "game" among officers, according to an Oct. 14 search warrant affidavit

Harrington told investigators he had done the same thing to female arrestees a "half dozen times in the last several years," according to the court records, which included leering text messages between Harrington and his Dublin CHP colleague, Officer Robert Hazelwood.

Contra Costa County prosecutors are investigating and say the conduct of the officers -- none of whom has been charged so far -- could compromise any criminal cases in which they are witnesses. CHP Commissioner Joe Farrow said in a statement that his agency too has "active and open investigations" and cited a similar case several years ago in Los Angeles involving a pair of officers.

"The allegations anger and disgust me," Farrow said. "We expect the highest levels of integrity and moral strength from everyone in the California Highway Patrol, and there is no place in our organization for such behavior."

Rick Madsen, the Danville attorney for the 23-year-old San Ramon woman who was the first to report Harrington, said the implications of the case are "far-reaching and very damaging."

"The callousness and depravity with which these officers communicated about my client is dehumanizing, horribly offensive and degrading to all women," he said. "It's going to lead to another level of mistrust and skepticism to the motive of law enforcement in general."

The San Ramon woman's DUI case has already been dismissed because of the investigation into Harrington's conduct, and Harrington has been placed on "desk duty," a CHP spokeswoman indicated. Deputy district attorney Barry Grove said he expects a decision about charges against officers in the CHP probe to be made next week.

In the search warrant affidavit, senior Contra Costa district attorney inspector Darryl Holcombe wrote that he found probable cause to show both CHP officers Harrington and Hazelwood and others engaged in a "scheme to unlawfully access the cell phone of female arrestees by intentionally gaining access to their cell phone and without their knowledge, stealing and retaining nude or partially clothed photographs of them." That behavior constitutes felony computer theft, the affidavit said.

As this newspaper first reported earlier this week, the investigation began with a single incident: Harrington's conduct during the Aug. 29 arrest of the San Ramon woman. The woman discovered that photos had been stolen from her phone five days after her release, when she noticed on her iPad that the photos had been sent to an unknown number. A record of the messages had been deleted from her iPhone, but the phone had been synced to the iPad.

In his investigation, Holcombe compared video surveillance and time-stamped text messages from the woman's phone and determined Harrington was in possession of the woman's phone at the moment the photos were forwarded. The woman -- who registered a blood-alcohol level of 0.29 percent, more than three times the legal limit -- was being processed in the Martinez County Jail when the photos were stolen, according to court records.

During questioning, Harrington admitted to stealing five photographs from the woman and said he forwarded at least one to Hazelwood, according to court records.

Reached by phone by this newspaper on Friday, Hazelwood declined to comment. Messages to the other two officers were not returned.

"Harrington said he first learned of this scheme when he was working in the Los Angeles office," Holcombe wrote in the affidavit. "Harrington said when he was assigned to the Dublin office, he learned from other officers that they would access the cell phones of female arrestees and look for nude photographs of them. Harrington said if photographs were located, the officers would then text the photographs to other sworn members of the office, and, to non-CHP individuals. Harrington described this scheme as a game."

20141024_065208_txtMSG-illustration_300.jpg


The new court documents describe a second incident involving a 19-year-old woman who was in a DUI crash in Livermore on Aug. 7. On Harrington's phone, Holcombe located two photos of that DUI suspect in a bikini accompanied by a text message from the day of the arrest from Harrington to Hazelwood: "Taken from the phone of my 10-15x while she's in X-rays. Enjoy buddy!!!"

A "10-15x" is CHP code for a woman in custody. The woman may have been at a hospital to have X-rays taken after the crash.

Hazelwood replies: "No f------ nudes?"

A short time later, the affidavit says, Harrington sent another Dublin CHP officer, Dion Simmons, the bikini photos with the same message indicating they were of a female arrestee. Simmons texted back "Nice" and "Hahahaaaa" and Harrington replies: "Just rerun a favor down the road buddy. 🙂"

Holcombe also detailed Aug. 29 text messages between Harrington and Hazelwood discussing the photos of the first woman in various states of undress.

Hazelwood asked to see her "dl," possibly referring to her driver's license photo, and Harrington texted back: "When we get back to office. And we'll have MDF (county jail) mug shot too."

The pair continued the text back-and-forth, commenting on her "rocking" body and breasts.

Link to news article

Wow...
 
Just use a lockscreen and tell the cops if they need to access it they can get a warrant. Yes, they will probably threaten you with obstruction of justice, but they cant actually do anything (legally). If they arrest you just for that, then you have a nice little civil suit against them.

Either way, as soon as you get your lawyer you will be fine.
 
From the comments:
Two stupid acts: One by the idiots who put nude photos on their phones, the other by the involved LEOs.

Yes, lets blame the victim for having nudes on their phones. Privacy? What's that?
 
The California Highway Patrol officer accused of stealing nude photos from a DUI suspect's phone told investigators that he and his fellow officers have been trading such images for years

What a fuckface rat.
 
I'm sorry victims but you really are idiots for keeping nude photos on your phone and you don't want anyone to see them.

Do any of you keep nude photos of yourselves on your phone? Why not?

What a bout a nude photo in your wallet? Maybe in the glove compartment of your car? Those are private places too. Except with those placed at least some hacker from another country cannot download them.
 
I'm sorry victims but you really are idiots for keeping nude photos on your phone and you don't want anyone to see them.

Do any of you keep nude photos of yourselves on your phone? Why not?

What a bout a nude photo in your wallet? Maybe in the glove compartment of your car? Those are private places too. Except with those placed at least some hacker from another country cannot download them.


The woman in this case are the victim. Only thing you could say to them would just that they should make sure their phones have a lock code on them so people cannot access them if they're not supposed to. This would extend on authorized access as well as if their phone had been stolen.

- Merg
 
bostonmil5.jpg


Your iPhone is now encrypted. The FBI says it'll help kidnappers.

NYPD commissioner doesn’t like phone encryption, either

Don't want to share your private information with the Warrior Cops?

How hard do you think it is for them to get an anonymous informant to say that there are drugs in your house?

Or, how about they confuse addresses and send a SWAT Team to your house?

Its (drug) war baby! And we all know what happens to civilians in war time...

Uno
I've lived in Vietnam during the war, and the soldiers (including American soldiers) wear less intimidating gears into battle than the police in your picture.

IMHO, it look like the police in America are over dress even for world war. And, if they are dressing like that, they have the mentality to act as they are going into battle and ready to kill.

Keeping nude photos of yourselves in your phone is stupid, but isn't a crime. The crime here is the thieve who illegally access it and stole the pictures.
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry victims but you really are idiots for keeping nude photos on your phone and you don't want anyone to see them.

Do any of you keep nude photos of yourselves on your phone? Why not?

What a bout a nude photo in your wallet? Maybe in the glove compartment of your car? Those are private places too. Except with those placed at least some hacker from another country cannot download them.

Are you arguing that the women deserve it or the cops actions are OK
 
yes, there will be people on ATOT ready to defend these cops....


i've never understood it either..

it usually comes down to "DONT BREAK THE LAW, AND YOU WONT COME IN CONTACT WITH POLICE"

which anyone who actually lives in the real world, will know... its just way past that at this point...
 
Are you arguing that the women deserve it or the cops actions are OK

It is completely possible to argue neither case and still declare anyone who keeps nude selfies on their phones to be a moron who is rolling the dice of chance on whether or not their intimate photos become fodder for the next fappening whether it be a small event among cops, phone repair dudes or NSA analysts. With the last group even taking the photo in the 1st place and then deleting right after is still no protection against them. And of course if you're into having even more insecurity in your life and you're using "the cloud" to backup your intimate photographs then you're rolling the dice of chance every minute of every day.

At what point will people wake up and see that in the real world there are risks to taking nude selfies and if they take those risks willingly then they need to be prepared for being the subject of either ridicule or fapp. This isn't victim blaming, this is called understanding extremely basic technological and societal concepts and using that knowledge to not be a moron.
 
It is completely possible to argue neither case and still declare anyone who keeps nude selfies on their phones to be a moron who is rolling the dice of chance on whether or not their intimate photos become fodder for the next fappening whether it be a small event among cops, phone repair dudes or NSA analysts. With the last group even taking the photo in the 1st place and then deleting right after is still no protection against them. And of course if you're into having even more insecurity in your life and you're using "the cloud" to backup your intimate photographs then you're rolling the dice of chance every minute of every day.

At what point will people wake up and see that in the real world there are risks to taking nude selfies and if they take those risks willingly then they need to be prepared for being the subject of either ridicule or fapp. This isn't victim blaming, this is called understanding extremely basic technological and societal concepts and using that knowledge to not be a moron.

that's not what the thread is about, the thread about is these cops actively PURSUING THESE PICS, effectively victimizing the owners of the phones..

it's not about, whether it's safe, or you DESERVE to have your nudies looked at for having them on such a stupid place..
 
that's not what the thread is about, the thread about is these cops actively PURSUING THESE PICS, effectively victimizing the owners of the phones..

it's not about, whether it's safe, or you DESERVE to have your nudies looked at for having them on such a stupid place..
tell that to the person whom I was responding to.

The cops were assholes. Guys repairing phones are probably no different.
Guys repairing PC's for college girls are probably no different. Focusing on one off instances is good for venting outrage but it accomplishes little.


but if you want the thread to stay perfectly on topic:
Asshole cop asshole cop asshole asshole asshole cop cop cop ass cop hole fire them fire them anger at cop hate those guys. ignore larger problem.
/success
 
It is completely possible to argue neither case and still declare anyone who keeps nude selfies on their phones to be a moron who is rolling the dice of chance on whether or not their intimate photos become fodder for the next fappening whether it be a small event among cops, phone repair dudes or NSA analysts. With the last group even taking the photo in the 1st place and then deleting right after is still no protection against them. And of course if you're into having even more insecurity in your life and you're using "the cloud" to backup your intimate photographs then you're rolling the dice of chance every minute of every day.

At what point will people wake up and see that in the real world there are risks to taking nude selfies and if they take those risks willingly then they need to be prepared for being the subject of either ridicule or fapp. This isn't victim blaming, this is called understanding extremely basic technological and societal concepts and using that knowledge to not be a moron.
Ummm, just sayin, :whiste:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
 
Ummm, just sayin, :whiste:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

those are nice principles. :colbert:
too bad the govt doesn't give a crap about them.
 
"I proceeded to tell him the story of the twenty-seven 8 x 10 colored glossy
Pictures with the circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one" and he stopped me right there and said, "Kid, I want you to go over and sit down on that bench that says 'Group W'."
 
When photos are taken from celeb's; they shouldn't have taken those photos, plus, they are in the public eye,.. we are ENTITLED to those pictures.

When photos are taken from arrestees; OMG, oppression!! Abuse!!! HALP!!!

I am not sure how in the situation of taking someone's photos from their phone, one victim is the bad guy (celebs) and the other is truly a victim,.. oh, yeah, in the latter we are bashing cops,.. sorry. Carry on.
 
When photos are taken from celeb's; they shouldn't have taken those photos, plus, they are in the public eye,.. we are ENTITLED to those pictures.

When photos are taken from arrestees; OMG, oppression!! Abuse!!! HALP!!!

I am not sure how in the situation of taking someone's photos from their phone, one victim is the bad guy (celebs) and the other is truly a victim,.. oh, yeah, in the latter we are bashing cops,.. sorry. Carry on.

I gotta disagree with you here. In the case of the celebs, people are hacking into their accounts or their cloud data and stealing the photos. While they are in the limelight so they should be cognizant that people will try to get dirt on them, it is still illegal.

In these cases, law enforcement officers are stealing the photos from arrestees. This is absolutely criminal and these officers should be in jail for doing this.

- Merg
 
I gotta disagree with you here. In the case of the celebs, people are hacking into their accounts or their cloud data and stealing the photos. While they are in the limelight so they should be cognizant that people will try to get dirt on them, it is still illegal.

In these cases, law enforcement officers are stealing the photos from arrestees. This is absolutely criminal and these officers should be in jail for doing this.

- Merg

I could be wrong, but, I don't think you are disagreeing with me. The act of taking something that does not belong to you is illegal - and, both hackers and cops,.. or anyone,.. who does this should be punished.

The reality (or the sentiment in this community, by some members - not all) is that hackers get a free pass (because the celebs should have better protected their data) and the cops should all be imprisoned.

Either this act of taking someone's photos is, or isn't appropriate.
 
The hackers can be found and sentenced for all I care. What makes me mad is that they want to prosecute those who just view or even store or share the stuff that is already basically on the web forever.
 
Back
Top