I've been looking at them because externals are much cheaper than internals, but reviews like these scare me:
"Because of the terrible overall performance and consistency of data transfers in the external enclosure, I decided to pull the drive out and use it internally.
Obviously, as others have stated, that does not work. This drive has a crippled CC41 firmware that has an APM value of 64 (250 or higher is ideal for performance) causing constant head parking and spindown, both wearing out the drive. Since it has a 1 year warranty, I think this, in addition to the non-existent cooling of the enclosure, is obviously intentional on Seagate's part.
The firmware is also apparently crippled to not run AHCI in an again obvious attempt to prevent people from getting the "cheaper" external USB drives that carry a weak warranty, in order to push them toward more expensive internal retail drives."
Does anybody know if this is still true for Seagate?
Not sure, I've bought 4 of their 3TB externals in the last couple years and immediately pulled them out and used them internally with no issues.
They are running CC96 and CC49
I actually wrote that review (Timmmay) and there are threads here on AT about it. I got in legal trouble with Seagate and they sent me a cease and desist citing the digital millennium copyright act when I started detailing on various forums ways to bypass/modify the firmware AHCI restrictions that prevent "shucking" into a PC.
I've been looking at them because externals are much cheaper than internals, but reviews like these scare me:
"Because of the terrible overall performance and consistency of data transfers in the external enclosure, I decided to pull the drive out and use it internally.
Obviously, as others have stated, that does not work. This drive has a crippled CC41 firmware that has an APM value of 64 (250 or higher is ideal for performance) causing constant head parking and spindown, both wearing out the drive. Since it has a 1 year warranty, I think this, in addition to the non-existent cooling of the enclosure, is obviously intentional on Seagate's part.
The firmware is also apparently crippled to not run AHCI in an again obvious attempt to prevent people from getting the "cheaper" external USB drives that carry a weak warranty, in order to push them toward more expensive internal retail drives."
Does anybody know if this is still true for Seagate?
Just received this drive today mine has the CC44 firmware. Pulled it and installed it. No problems whatsoever. Read/write speeds are fine.
Are you saying you received a 5TB external with CC44 firmware, not CC41 firmware?
That's interesting. Because CC44 is a 3Gbps (SATA2) firmware that's literally been around since the 1TB (333GB/platter) drives. I can't wrap my head around Seagate tweaking this firmware for 1TB/platter drives and keeping the same version like GM revised ignition switches without changing the model number...
truckerCLOCK, for the sake of not spreading false information, I want it to be clear to the forum members that it is impossible you have a 5TB drive running CC44.
You must be talking about a 3TB\4TB external drive. Any drive running CC44/CC45 can be shucked (the firmware isn't crippled) and hope that you get the CC45 because it has less aggressive APM and a 6Gbps controller. These are all 800GB/platter drives labeled Barracuda XT. CC44 drives you install internally should have "HDparm" pass it a command value of 250 or higher to prevent the drive from parking itself to death.