<<
I know price was your main consideration, but I think that the S-Video in is a critical feature to miss. You will notice quite a dramatically better picture with S-video, especially with DVD source. If this is just a second or third TV, then it's probably not as big a loss, but if you are forking the dough over, might as well get something that will last a while, eh? >>
S-Video really is not that important from what I've found. It all depends on the tv, really. I've got a good monster cable RCA video cable that I ran from my dvd player to my TV, and I hooked the DVD player up with that at first..and it looked really nice. Now, I had a friend come over and say 'buy the s-video cable, it makes it look so much better' well, I did that. Now, to tell you the truth..there was hardly any difference if any. I examined many dvds and in different conditions (lots of color on screen, dark scenes, etc.) and between the s-video cable and normal RCA, the only difference I could find is that the black was just a little bit darker with the s-video. Something that could easily be adjusted in the tv options anyway. I'm sure different TVs take S-Video input differently, and in varying degrees of quality, but that's just what I've noticed on my father's big screen. (40" Mitsubishi Tube - Rarer than rare, and was a $3000 tv 5+ years ago - excellent TV)
Perhaps the S-Video input is important on Flat screens, where they can display much more picture information in a given area, but just your standard Tube TVs..In my opinion, you really aren't going to notice much. Besides, if you're that obsessed over picture quality..you should be spending $600+ on a good TV.
