- Jul 25, 2011
- 1,432
- 142
- 106
Every nation has the right to defend themselves, so I want to be clear here that I'm not pro/anti-Israel here. With Iran basically waltzing around stating they're going to glass Israel, I, too, would be a little nervous watching them build their nuclear program. But when I read the bold statements below, it really struck me as, "Well if the Americans aren't going to do it, we're just going to have to go in and do it ourselves."
Is Israel politically justifying to the world its near-future actions? They are well known to act militarily without second thought, but using the Crimea situation and our lack of military intervention in Iran seems to be a bit of a stretch.
I think there's gradual change coming to the United States. There are a lot of very compassionate, reasonable, intelligent Americans, and I think we're growing tire of the world perceiving us as bullies and warmongers. There is a lot of controversy regarding the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan back in 2003, controversy I think we as a whole have learned from, but if there is one precedent I don't think we prepared for, it's that when we consistently intervene and stick our nose where it doesn't belong, then other nations begin to rely on that and politically justify their own actions when we don't.
I do not perceive the United States as growing weaker in world influence, only that we're no longer willing to justify the steep price of being the world's sole hyperpower. It was easier to do so when much of the world was still ravaged by the Second World War, and we've largely enjoyed 70 years of great world prosperity (not perfect though) because of our stabilizing post-war influence. But now that these woulds are healing and nations grow more prosperous, it's becoming increasingly more clear that the nations of the world are awakening to the idea of "self-autonomy" again, and that means being able to act out on its own self interests.
Are we beginning to see the effects of the power vacuum being left open as the United States pulls back? Or am I just admitting that I've drank too much coffee this morning and over-thinking this crap and there's nothing to worry about?
Source: http://news.yahoo.com/israels-defense-chief-says-u-projecting-weakness-114022613.html
Is Israel politically justifying to the world its near-future actions? They are well known to act militarily without second thought, but using the Crimea situation and our lack of military intervention in Iran seems to be a bit of a stretch.
I think there's gradual change coming to the United States. There are a lot of very compassionate, reasonable, intelligent Americans, and I think we're growing tire of the world perceiving us as bullies and warmongers. There is a lot of controversy regarding the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan back in 2003, controversy I think we as a whole have learned from, but if there is one precedent I don't think we prepared for, it's that when we consistently intervene and stick our nose where it doesn't belong, then other nations begin to rely on that and politically justify their own actions when we don't.
I do not perceive the United States as growing weaker in world influence, only that we're no longer willing to justify the steep price of being the world's sole hyperpower. It was easier to do so when much of the world was still ravaged by the Second World War, and we've largely enjoyed 70 years of great world prosperity (not perfect though) because of our stabilizing post-war influence. But now that these woulds are healing and nations grow more prosperous, it's becoming increasingly more clear that the nations of the world are awakening to the idea of "self-autonomy" again, and that means being able to act out on its own self interests.
Are we beginning to see the effects of the power vacuum being left open as the United States pulls back? Or am I just admitting that I've drank too much coffee this morning and over-thinking this crap and there's nothing to worry about?
Source: http://news.yahoo.com/israels-defense-chief-says-u-projecting-weakness-114022613.html
ERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel's defense minister has accused the United States of projecting weakness internationally and said Israel could not rely on its main ally to take the lead in confronting Iran over its nuclear program.
Related Stories
At White House, Israel's Netanyahu pushes back against Obama diplomacy Reuters
Obama warns of 'fallout' for Israel if peace effort fails Reuters
At White House, Israel's Netanyahu pushes back against Obama diplomacy Reuters
Israel PM vows to resist 'pressures' on US visit AFP
Netanyahu urges more pressure on Iran Associated Press
Moshe Yaalon, whose remarks were reported in the Haaretz daily on Tuesday, caused friction with the United States only two months ago when he described Secretary of State John Kerry's quest for Israeli-Palestinian peace as messianic and obsessive.
His latest comments, confirmed by an Israeli official who was present at lecture Yaalon delivered at Tel Aviv University on Monday, displayed deep disappointment with U.S. President Barack Obama's handling of burning world issues.
"We had thought it would be the United States that would lead the campaign against Iran," said Yaalon, who pointed to the Ukraine crisis as an example of Washington "showing weakness".
It was unclear from Yaalon's reported remarks where he believed the United States, which on Monday imposed sanctions on two top aides to President Vladimir Putin and nine other people linked to Russia's Crimean incursion, had gone wrong on Ukraine.
Iran and six world powers will try to make headway on the nuclear dispute in talks that started in Vienna on Tuesday, with Western officials hoping the challenge will not be made even more difficult by the Ukraine crisis.
Yaalon said that although "people know Iran cheats", the United States and other nations chose to negotiate with Tehran on restricting activities they fear are aimed at developing atomic arms.
"Therefore, on this matter, we have to behave as though we have nobody to look out for us but ourselves," Yaalon said, echoing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's veiled threats of unilateral military action against Iran if diplomacy fails.
"Unfortunately, when it comes to negotiating at a Persian bazaar, the Iranians are better," said Yaalon, a former armed forces chief and a hawkish member of Netanyahu's right-wing Likud party.
In the Middle East, Yaalon said, he had heard "voices of disappointment" over a lack of U.S. support for Sunni Muslim rebels in the three-year-old conflict in Syria.
And on a recent visit in Asia, he added, he found "disappointment about China getting stronger and the U.S. getting weaker".
Netanyahu, whose country is widely believed to be the Middle East's only nuclear-armed nation, has denounced as a "historic mistake" an interim deal reached with Iran in November on curbing sensitive nuclear activities in return for limited sanctions relief.
He has demanded that any final accord dismantle Tehran's uranium enrichment centrifuges, a position at odds with Obama's suggestion that Iran, which says its nuclear program is peaceful, could be allowed to enrich on a limited basis for civilian purposes.
"Comfortable Westerners prefer to put off confrontation, if possible to next year or the next leadership term. But in the end, it will blow up," Yaalon said.
(Reporting by Jeffrey Heller; Editing by Alistair Lyon)