neckarb, what does that have to do with anything? We are not the UK, we actually wanted nothing to do with the UK, hence the reason we have our own country.
You're talking about putting a person in jail for collecting plants that natively grow in north america.
When I'm elected gov'na, I'm going to send out roaming death squads that kill everyone who touches crab grass. :ninja:
me thinks it was 5 sack of regs. thats what half e (1/16) of regs goes for in the ghetto.
Sorry dude I wasn't aiming that at you, some guy was complaining that I wont understand because I come from a barbaric blah blah blah insert some shit about the origins of the UK government, and I was pointing out that the US originated from the UK... so...
In any event. Not aimed at you.
The American Indians must have flown it in.Uh... Marijuana doesn't natively grow in North America. In fact the only place I know of historically it is from is the Kush mountain range in the Afghanistan area.
Well you wouldn't understand because of where you're from.
The American Indians must have flown it in.
I certainly wouldn't understand the following mentality:
If I don't like a law, I will ignore it, and that is fine.
I certainly wouldn't understand the following mentality:
If I don't like a law, I will ignore it, and that is fine.
No I see the connection, but you are also implying that both stoning women and drug ownership laws are unjust, when one clearly is and the other (IMO) isn't
I don't understand the following mentality:
I will follow the law even if it's broken and that is fine.
Sorry dude I wasn't aiming that at you, some guy was complaining that I wont understand because I come from a barbaric blah blah blah insert some shit about the origins of the UK government, and I was pointing out that the US originated from the UK... so...
The alternative is:
I won't follow the law if I don't agree with it.
See the issue?
it depends on the justness of the law, and the ability to generate a movement against it.
There is a reason no one is going to challenge laws against murder. Those that violate civil and individual rights, however, should always be challenged.
always.
necktard is the type to roll over and let his country videotape every second of his public life, b/c he thinks it's "for his own good."
he is the definition of sheep.
The alternative is:
I won't follow the law if I don't agree with it.
See the issue?
damn that rosa parks for what she started.
DAMN HER TO HELL. Bitch should've just sat the fuck down.
I don't understand the following mentality:
I will follow the law even if it's broken and that is fine.
They should have prosecuted, if it's a crime its a crime.
I do speed when I drive, but I don't complain that the law is unjust when I get pulled over, I acknowledge my guilt.
I'm not thinking oh this law doesn't apply to me as it is unjust, I'm thinking I am breaking the law, and taking a calculated risk
They should have prosecuted, if it's a crime its a crime.
In 22 years he has yet to say anything of value.In a bit more than two months, neckarb has posted more than 2,800 times, and has yet to say anything of value.
The American Indians must have flown it in.
