WANTED: Your thoughts on my overclock

rhawk79

Member
May 31, 2003
125
0
0
I have the Asus P4P800, 512MB of XMS3500 and a p4 3.0C...case: Coolermaster ATC-201

From reading forums and reviews it seems the 3.0 overclocks top out anywhere from 240-250 fsb. I can currently hit 245 max bootable, with 240 being my max stable boot. Tomorrow I was planning on purchasing the following: (total cost = $110)

SLK-900
4 80mm Panaflo High output fans (double the rpm at the same noise level of my current cheapo fans)
1 92mm Panaflo High Output fan

Question: If I can already get to the speeds that others are reaching, and I'm only using stock cooling, do you think this is a waste of money? Even now at 240 I have never seen my CPU or Northbridge temperatures hit 40C...which is in part due to the great cooling of my case. What's your opinion? Waste of $110 or will this help me go further?
 

rhawk79

Member
May 31, 2003
125
0
0
that's what i'm thinking...i'm looking for opinions on what will help me push the system higher and what would be a waste...
 

Overkiller

Platinum Member
Feb 22, 2003
2,461
0
0
i believe the slk-900 w/ a good 80 or 90 mm fan on it along w/ artic silver 3 would be ur best bet. and quiter fans...110 IS too much for just a lil. bit more though...
 

Detselom

Member
Jun 21, 2002
183
0
0
I have 4 case fans also and if you could double the cfm i'd go for it. Having a cool case is a very good thing for your overclock. Keeps the videocard, north bridge, hd cool.
 

Jeff7181

Lifer
Aug 21, 2002
18,368
11
81
I don't think heat is the issue... with a 240 Mhz FSB, you're running at 3.6 Ghz... that's up there... way up there. Intel was nearing the limits of it's manufacturing processes already, which is why they're looking at using a strained silicon technique to go higher.

In short, "waste of $110"
 

d33pblue

Senior member
Jul 2, 2003
225
1
81
Hawk, deepblue here. I think you know who I am;)

To answer your question, I dont believe spending $110 is worth getting another 15Mhz or so out of your FSB. I'm not even quite sure if you would notice such an increase in anything but prolonged CPU intensive tasks. Unless you consider this purely a hobby, want the biggest numbers you can, and have money to spare, I wouldnt recommend doing it. I say be happy with your 3.6Ghz (!! 15x240MHz) computer.

3.6Ghz wont feel slow for quite some time.
 

bgeh

Platinum Member
Nov 16, 2001
2,946
0
0
imo, the limit is already at around 3.5-3.7GHz
so i don't think you can go much higher
so keep your $110
 

BadThad

Lifer
Feb 22, 2000
12,100
49
91
Originally posted by: Jeff7181
I don't think heat is the issue... with a 240 Mhz FSB, you're running at 3.6 Ghz... that's up there... way up there. Intel was nearing the limits of it's manufacturing processes already, which is why they're looking at using a strained silicon technique to go higher.

In short, "waste of $110"

Exactly.
 

GtPrOjEcTX

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
10,784
6
81
Originally posted by: rhawk79 Even now at 240 I have never seen my CPU or Northbridge temperatures hit 40C...which is in part due to the great cooling of my case.
that should answer your question right there. if your cpu isn't overheating at that OC, why spend more money on trying to keep it cool? It won't help at all.

 

rhawk79

Member
May 31, 2003
125
0
0
thanks deep and everyone else for the replies. my opinion was that i didn't need it but i wanted some second opinions. i'll save this money and apply it elsewhere:):):)
 
Apr 17, 2003
37,622
0
76
Originally posted by: rhawk79
thanks deep and everyone else for the replies. my opinion was that i didn't need it but i wanted some second opinions. i'll save this money and apply it elsewhere:):):)

good call
 

batmang

Diamond Member
Jul 16, 2003
3,020
1
81
hehe, 3.6ghz, nice. im only at 3.12 and i have pretty much everything you were going to purchase, i spent a lot and got my 2.6c at 3.12ghz. I wanted more, but that seems to be my max 100% stable oc. You could buy a nice sata hd or something with that $110.
 

Jeff7181

Lifer
Aug 21, 2002
18,368
11
81
Originally posted by: batmang
hehe, 3.6ghz, nice. im only at 3.12 and i have pretty much everything you were going to purchase, i spent a lot and got my 2.6c at 3.12ghz. I wanted more, but that seems to be my max 100% stable oc. You could buy a nice sata hd or something with that $110.

The only SATA hard drive worth buying is the Raptor... otherwise SATA is pointless... well... unless of course you like to make your computer pretty, in which case SATA cables would clean it up a little.
 

Slammy1

Platinum Member
Apr 8, 2003
2,112
0
76
Hmmm, running the stock cooler at 3.6GHz might be risky. Instead of the Thermalight solution, you might consider a Zalman with some Ceramique. If you're running above 60C CPU, I'd recommend better cooling than stock. I have a similar (albiet the budget version) of your system:
P4P800-D
2X256 HyperX3500
2.4C@3.38GHz
ATC-201C
If I had your system, I'd try for my highest o/c on a 1:1 divider rather than maxing out my CPU on a 5:4. My HperX maxes out around 450DDR, I'd think yours should reach that or higher.
 

solofly

Banned
May 25, 2003
1,421
0
0
Originally posted by: batmang
hehe, 3.6ghz, nice.

Not as nice as a 2.4C at 3.5Ghz...;) One thing to consider. CPU may not go any further but the temps will drop without a doubt. I found about 9C difference between SLK900U and a stock HSF.

 

solofly

Banned
May 25, 2003
1,421
0
0
Originally posted by: batmang
im only at 3.12 and i have pretty much everything you were going to purchase, i spent a lot and got my 2.6c at 3.12ghz. I wanted more, but that seems to be my max 100% stable oc. You could buy a nice sata hd or something with that $110.

Now in your case as you're already using the best air-cooling setup possible, going back to stock HSF would lower your current overclock of 3.12GHz. It happened to me when I removed the SLK900U off of my 2.6C and gone back to stock.
 

stevejst

Banned
May 12, 2002
1,018
0
0
imo, the limit is already at around 3.5-3.7GHz
so i don't think you can go much higher
Talking about air cooling. Now if you have $200 you can move to the next step, which is either Peltier or watercooler. Corsair, Thermaltake, and Koolance all have a complete out of the box solution for about $200 (anything cheaper than that is either self made or junk) which will give you another 100-200 MHz, say up to 3.8 GHz. If you have $600 you can get Prometeia which will push the beast up to 4 GHz. For anything more than that you'll need liquid nitrogen.
The question is how much money you have? :D