3 days ago I switched back to my CoolerMaster 120mm fans and now I'm getting about 100 points higher in Cinebench 20 CPU multicore test consistently once again and my CPU does not thermal throttle as much now. I would usually get between 5800-5900 (on a few occasions dropping as low as the upper 5700's) in CB20 with the Arctics and with these CoolerMasters I'm getting between 5900-6000 and never dropping below 5900. This seems strange to me as these Arctic fans are advertised to produce better airflow and static pressure than these CoolerMasters, plus when I had the Arctics installed, I had 2x140mm for intakes (and set them to run at the same rpm's as the 120mm CoolerMasters which is around 1200 rpm). I was thinking that the front intake cutouts of my case were probably designed for 3x120mm fans in mind, rather than 2x140mm fans for intakes, as there are metal strips that block some airflow from the 140mm fans and the fan intake cutouts are sized for 120mm fans and much smaller than 140mm fans, despite this case supporting 140mm fans as the case has screw holes to accommodate 140mm intakes as well. Could that be why I'm getting better CPU cooling with these CoolerMasters (1x120mm exhaust and 2x120mm intakes) vs Arctics (1x120mm exhaust and 2x140mm intakes)? Also when I had my Arctics installed I set them to a fixed 1200 rpm, but then again even setting them to variable speed (based on CPU temperature) did not seem to do anything for CPU cooling, and just made this PC louder. Should I have gone with 3x120mm Arctics as intakes instead of 2x140mm Arctics as intakes due to my cases intake fan cutouts size?