• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Wanker Roll Call.

spaceman

Lifer
i know there are other variables..lets just assume they have all been well maintained.
1993 Acura INTEGRA RS
1995 Acura INTEGRA ?S
1996 Chevy s10 4.3l v6 4x4
1992-1996 Toyota ext cab 4x4


which of the few would have the lowest potential maitenance cost and longevity?



edited for the anal.
 
You mean '92 to early '95 (pre-Tacoma) Toyota ext. cab 4x4? If so, then that would be the one. Mine (my 2nd car) has 120k+ miles on it and has never seen one bit of unscheduled maintenance. Still drives like a brand new truck. If it's the 3.0L V6, make sure you get the free lifetime TSB head work done at a dealer (if it hasn't already).

edit: and he means the Integra RS
edit2: GS-R = sporty, GS = sport-like, LS = semi-luxury, RS = base
 
Originally posted by: jumpr
Acura didn't even have an "RS" in 1993, and they still don't. The closest name is the RSX:

Edmunds.com link

Now what car are you really talking about?
I think both those Acuras he listed must be Integras... I think at different points in time there was an RS, GS, and LS, though I don't know the hierarchy went with those..
 
Originally posted by: ncircle
Originally posted by: jumpr
Acura didn't even have an "RS" in 1993, and they still don't. The closest name is the RSX:

Edmunds.com link

Now what car are you really talking about?

tell that to empire auto


im only going by what im reading.
You read wrong. That site lists a 1993 Integra RS. You said "Acura RS."

If I said I was looking at a Ford SE, would you have any clue what I was talking about?
 
Originally posted by: MazerRackham
Originally posted by: jumpr
Acura didn't even have an "RS" in 1993, and they still don't. The closest name is the RSX:

Edmunds.com link

Now what car are you really talking about?
I think both those Acuras he listed must be Integras... I think at different points in time there was an RS, GS, and LS, though I don't know the hierarchy went with those..

1993 integra rs
coupe, auto, only 72,000 original miles, $3950 where else but Empire State Cars Albany, NY (518) 437-9101 Empire State Cars
 
Originally posted by: jumpr
Originally posted by: ncircle
Originally posted by: jumpr
Acura didn't even have an "RS" in 1993, and they still don't. The closest name is the RSX:

Edmunds.com link

Now what car are you really talking about?

tell that to empire auto


im only going by what im reading.
You read wrong. That site lists a 1993 Integra RS. You said "Acura RS."

If I said I was looking at a Ford SE, would you have any clue what I was talking about?

cripes dude.lighten up
im not a student of acura or of cars period(as if you couldnt tell by my post)
so if u came into the thread to flame me on a technicality...get a life.
 
Originally posted by: ncircle
Originally posted by: jumpr
Originally posted by: ncircle
Originally posted by: jumpr
Acura didn't even have an "RS" in 1993, and they still don't. The closest name is the RSX:

Edmunds.com link

Now what car are you really talking about?

tell that to empire auto


im only going by what im reading.
You read wrong. That site lists a 1993 Integra RS. You said "Acura RS."

If I said I was looking at a Ford SE, would you have any clue what I was talking about?

cripes dude.lighten up
im not a student of acura or of cars period(as if you couldnt tell by my post)
so if u came into the thread to flame me on a technicality...get a life.
In that case, I'm not a student of Toyotas. Can you tell me about their "LE" model? If I was looking at a Toyota LE and a Chevy LS, which would you choose?

😛
 
Back
Top