Originally posted by: mugs
The United States military does the same thing.
Originally posted by: AMDZen
I don't see the problem, they know they're only working for tips - they wouldn't do it if they never got anything out of it. Cultural differences here.
Originally posted by: AMDZen
I don't see the problem, they know they're only working for tips - they wouldn't do it if they never got anything out of it. Cultural differences here.
Originally posted by: Dunbar
Also, if they did pay them it would mean higher prices for the customers. I read an article that Walmart is hugely poular in Mexico because the average consumer is very price sensitive (due to low incomes). Gotta love these "do gooders" who want to force higher prices down poor peoples throats...
Originally posted by: purbeast0
after just coming back from Mexico, it is damn annoying how many times I was "reminded" that the people who are helping you out would like to be tipped.
Originally posted by: Kwaipie
Cotton was cheap in the south once upon a time. They had a great way of keeping costs down.
Sorry, the Corporation isn't always right.
That's what Corporations want you to believe. the truth is, their upper management makes more than all their hourly workers combined. They are what drives prices up, not the hourly workers.Originally posted by: Dunbar
Originally posted by: Kwaipie
Cotton was cheap in the south once upon a time. They had a great way of keeping costs down.
Sorry, the Corporation isn't always right.
I'm sure the poor Mexicans appreciate wealthy Americans telling them how they should spend their money. What you fail to understand is higher labor costs cause prices to go up. I'm sure you think it's just the evil corporation who would pay these salaries...
Nobody is forcing them into slavery either, nice strawman.
Originally posted by: manowar821
Originally posted by: AMDZen
I don't see the problem, they know they're only working for tips - they wouldn't do it if they never got anything out of it. Cultural differences here.
Mmm... Noo.. It's Walmart, they're evil.
Originally posted by: Baloo
That's what Corporations want you to believe. the truth is, their upper management makes more than all their hourly workers combined. They are what drives prices up, not the hourly workers.Originally posted by: Dunbar
Originally posted by: Kwaipie
Cotton was cheap in the south once upon a time. They had a great way of keeping costs down.
Sorry, the Corporation isn't always right.
I'm sure the poor Mexicans appreciate wealthy Americans telling them how they should spend their money. What you fail to understand is higher labor costs cause prices to go up. I'm sure you think it's just the evil corporation who would pay these salaries...
Nobody is forcing them into slavery either, nice strawman.
Originally posted by: Baloo
That's what Corporations want you to believe. the truth is, their upper management makes more than all their hourly workers combined. They are what drives prices up, not the hourly workers.Originally posted by: Dunbar
Originally posted by: Kwaipie
Cotton was cheap in the south once upon a time. They had a great way of keeping costs down.
Sorry, the Corporation isn't always right.
I'm sure the poor Mexicans appreciate wealthy Americans telling them how they should spend their money. What you fail to understand is higher labor costs cause prices to go up. I'm sure you think it's just the evil corporation who would pay these salaries...
Nobody is forcing them into slavery either, nice strawman.
Originally posted by: Kwaipie
Originally posted by: AMDZen
I don't see the problem, they know they're only working for tips - they wouldn't do it if they never got anything out of it. Cultural differences here.
This is the same reason Nike (et.al.) do business in 3rd world countries. They don't know better, hell, $.04 an hour is awesome to them.
Exploitation is exploitation, regardless of "this is how we've always done it"
Originally posted by: bsobel
For the record all the grocery chains I've been to in Mexico do this, Commercial Mexicana etc. In fact in some of those stores the baggers are as young as 8 but are only allowed to work for a few hours per day after school hours. If they had to be employees they honestly wouldnt get hired (too young). Is it exploitive, dunno, as I suspect the stores would simply not have baggers if the kids weren't there...
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
Originally posted by: Kwaipie
Originally posted by: AMDZen
I don't see the problem, they know they're only working for tips - they wouldn't do it if they never got anything out of it. Cultural differences here.
This is the same reason Nike (et.al.) do business in 3rd world countries. They don't know better, hell, $.04 an hour is awesome to them.
Exploitation is exploitation, regardless of "this is how we've always done it"
Paying American wages for unskilled labor in 3rd world countries would do far more harm than good.
What do you think would happen if the shoe stitching factory was suddenly the highest paying job in town (by an order of magnitude)?
Viper GTS
Originally posted by: Kwaipie
How about they stop employing small children and pay a living wage to those stitching your soccer ball? These places are in fact imposing their own version of slavery, they offer the only game in town, then allow the workers to become indentured to The Corporation where they have no choice but to continue working there, 18 hours a day.
How is having an 8 yr old bagging groceries not exploitive? If it were in the US, the management would be in jail.
Originally posted by: NanoStuff
Originally posted by: Kwaipie
How about they stop employing small children and pay a living wage to those stitching your soccer ball? These places are in fact imposing their own version of slavery, they offer the only game in town, then allow the workers to become indentured to The Corporation where they have no choice but to continue working there, 18 hours a day.
How is having an 8 yr old bagging groceries not exploitive? If it were in the US, the management would be in jail.
Better being exploited than rotting on the street I'd say. A poor country has to start somewhere.