• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Wal Mart plans to hire 150,000 people in China

Svnla

Lifer
Wal-Mart poised for major China expansion
China operations could match U.S. scale in 20 years, predicts Wal-Mart Asia chief.
March 19, 2006: 10:36 AM EST


SHENZHEN, China (Reuters) - Wal-Mart Stores Inc. plans to hire 150,000 people in China over the next five years, five times the number it currently employs here, as it prepares for a major store expansion.

Joe Hatfield, chief executive of Wal-Mart Asia, who has worked at the world's biggest retailer for more than 30 years and was its first employee in China in 1994, said on Sunday the company plans to open 20 stores in the country this year and is racing to train more staff so that it can speed up growth.

"We're really going to ramp this up," Hatfield told Reuters in an interview while touring stores in Shenzhen, Wal-Mart's China headquarters.

The Bentonville, Arkansas-based retailer currently has 56 stores in China, putting it behind other global chains such as France's Carrefour, which had 78 at the end of 2005.

Wal-Mart did not even register enough sales to crack the top 30 on the Ministry of Commerce list of the biggest retailers in China, released last month.

That looks set to change.

"We're going to be growing in all directions," Hatfield said, adding that new stores were planned for both the major metropolises and the smaller cities.

Barring any major economic upheaval, Wal-Mart's China operations could be as big as its U.S. business in 20 years, Hatfield said -- something that Wall Street analysts have long predicted. Wal-Mart now has about 3,700 U.S. stores.

The United States generated 80 percent of Wal-Mart's $312 billion in sales for the latest fiscal year, but slowing growth and rising opposition at home have made international expansion all the more appealing.

America's love-hate relationship with Wal-Mart is well-documented. The retailer boasts that 100 million people shop at its U.S. stores each week, and yet its critics have grown increasingly vocal in the past year.

Two union-funded groups have set up Web sites and launched grassroots campaigns aimed at drawing attention to what they consider stingy wages and benefits for Wal-Mart workers.

Communities across the country have campaigned against new Wal-Mart stores, saying they devour green space, increase traffic congestion and drive competitors out of business. Activists have succeeded in blocking or delaying dozens.

Wal-Mart University?
In China, however, consumers can't seem to get enough. Stores here can draw 1.2 million people per month, and the retailer is constantly on the lookout for new locations.

The biggest challenge is finding staff.

Hatfield said he has asked Wal-Mart to set up a university degree program here to train future employees to work in jobs ranging from master baker to accountant.

The retailer employs about 30,000 people in China, and Hatfield said he will need to hire 150,000 more as the expansion picks up steam. Wal-Mart has already started putting extra staff in stores so that they can learn on the job and be ready to manage newly opened locations.

Wal-Mart got off to a slow start here. Hatfield arrived in 1994, but it was nearly two years before the retailer opened its first stores. Growth has been modest since then, but China relaxed rules for foreign retailers at the end of 2004, making it easier to expand.

Hatfield spent his first months in China visiting other retailers to get a feel for shopping habits and tastes. As a result, outlets here may look like American megastores from the outside, but they carry a wide array of local delicacies such as sliced pig's ear, live fish and even crocodile.

Hatfield, 61, said he has no desire to leave, and hopes to stick around long enough to see the day when Wal-Mart China rivals the retailer's U.S. operations. He tells co-workers he plans to work until he is 80.

And after that, he wants to be a Wal-Mart greeter, standing at the entrance to welcome shoppers

Wal Mart plans to expanse big time
 
the chinese are learning english, why should we learn chinese?

plus those are chinese working in china at wally world stores there? i don't see a problem.
 
When China calls in the US Debt notes that it holds , it will simply quarantine US citizens travel, so that we cannot leave and can be starved into submission.
We could kill Chinese at the rate of 100,000 per day and never gain numerical PARITY much less superiority. The sooner we divest ourselves of the debt incurring mindset in Washington, the sooner we may actually have a say in our future.

The Chinese allow us to exist, because they need us..... for the time being.
 
the topic summary makes no sense, they are hiring them to work in the new stores in china, what does that have to do with us learning chinese?

oh, this is JAWBT (just another walmart bashing thread)
 
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
When China calls in the US Debt notes that it holds , it will simply quarantine US citizens travel, so that we cannot leave and can be starved into submission.
We could kill Chinese at the rate of 100,000 per day and never gain numerical PARITY much less superiority. The sooner we divest ourselves of the debt incurring mindset in Washington, the sooner we may actually have a say in our future.

The Chinese allow us to exist, because they need us..... for the time being.

The US makes most of the world's food.
 
Hatfield spent his first months in China visiting other retailers to get a feel for shopping habits and tastes. As a result, outlets here may look like American megastores from the outside, but they carry a wide array of local delicacies such as sliced pig's ear, live fish and even crocodile.
 
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
When China calls in the US Debt notes that it holds , it will simply quarantine US citizens travel, so that we cannot leave and can be starved into submission.
We could kill Chinese at the rate of 100,000 per day and never gain numerical PARITY much less superiority. The sooner we divest ourselves of the debt incurring mindset in Washington, the sooner we may actually have a say in our future.

The Chinese allow us to exist, because they need us..... for the time being.

The US makes most of the world's food.


Where did you get this from? As of 2005 the US imports more food than it exports.
 
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
When China calls in the US Debt notes that it holds , it will simply quarantine US citizens travel, so that we cannot leave and can be starved into submission.
We could kill Chinese at the rate of 100,000 per day and never gain numerical PARITY much less superiority. The sooner we divest ourselves of the debt incurring mindset in Washington, the sooner we may actually have a say in our future.

The Chinese allow us to exist, because they need us..... for the time being.

The US makes most of the world's food.

Yeah, no doubt. I believe that the reason the US is the world's wealthiest nation is because it has the highest percentage of arable land on earth, and by far the most productive arable land at that.

Originally posted by: wvtalbot
Where did you get this from? As of 2005 the US imports more food than it exports.
This is untrue. The US ended the 2005 calendar year with a $3.5 billion agricultural trade surplus. Text
The trend of the shrinking trade surplus is due to the fact the US mostly exports inexpensive food staples (i.e. wheat, corn, soybeans, etc.) while mostly importing expensive food luxuries (coffee, wine, etc.). One would have to be really working hard to foolishly and intentionally miscontrue the trade data to think that this might pose an impending agricultural crisis, or to believe in Chicken Little-like fashion that the US could ever be starved out by another country.

edit: This thread clearly demonstrates the fallacy of believing that economies are net sum zero.
 
Originally posted by: wvtalbot
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
When China calls in the US Debt notes that it holds , it will simply quarantine US citizens travel, so that we cannot leave and can be starved into submission.
We could kill Chinese at the rate of 100,000 per day and never gain numerical PARITY much less superiority. The sooner we divest ourselves of the debt incurring mindset in Washington, the sooner we may actually have a say in our future.

The Chinese allow us to exist, because they need us..... for the time being.

The US makes most of the world's food.


Where did you get this from? As of 2005 the US imports more food than it exports.
Agreed, the Gilroy Garlic Festival has been importing Chinese Garlic for some years now.
The US is no longer the "World's Garden"
California Central Valley agriculture land is being gobbled up for housing.

 
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Originally posted by: wvtalbot
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
When China calls in the US Debt notes that it holds , it will simply quarantine US citizens travel, so that we cannot leave and can be starved into submission.
We could kill Chinese at the rate of 100,000 per day and never gain numerical PARITY much less superiority. The sooner we divest ourselves of the debt incurring mindset in Washington, the sooner we may actually have a say in our future.

The Chinese allow us to exist, because they need us..... for the time being.

The US makes most of the world's food.


Where did you get this from? As of 2005 the US imports more food than it exports.
Agreed, the Gilroy Garlic Festival has been importing Chinese Garlic for some years now.
The US is no longer the "World's Garden"
California Central Valley agriculture land is being gobbled up for housing.

:roll:
 
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
When China calls in the US Debt notes that it holds , it will simply quarantine US citizens travel, so that we cannot leave and can be starved into submission.
We could kill Chinese at the rate of 100,000 per day and never gain numerical PARITY much less superiority. The sooner we divest ourselves of the debt incurring mindset in Washington, the sooner we may actually have a say in our future.

The Chinese allow us to exist, because they need us..... for the time being.

The US makes most of the world's food.

Yeah, no doubt. I believe that the reason the US is the world's wealthiest nation is because it has the highest percentage of arable land on earth, and by far the most productive arable land at that.

Originally posted by: wvtalbot
Where did you get this from? As of 2005 the US imports more food than it exports.
This is untrue. The US ended the 2005 calendar year with a $3.5 billion agricultural trade surplus. Text
The trend of the shrinking trade surplus is due to the fact the US mostly exports inexpensive food staples (i.e. wheat, corn, soybeans, etc.) while mostly importing expensive food luxuries (coffee, wine, etc.). One would have to be really working hard to foolishly and intentionally miscontrue the trade data to think that this might pose an impending agricultural crisis, or to believe in Chicken Little-like fashion that the US could ever be starved out by another country.

edit: This thread clearly demonstrates the fallacy of believing that economies are net sum zero.


Actually you are correct, the last time I looked at the data was in 2004 and the USDA predicted a deficet in 2005, which didn't happen, but the trend still continues and I wouldn't be surprise to see little or no surplus for 2006.
 
Originally posted by: wvtalbot
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
When China calls in the US Debt notes that it holds , it will simply quarantine US citizens travel, so that we cannot leave and can be starved into submission.
We could kill Chinese at the rate of 100,000 per day and never gain numerical PARITY much less superiority. The sooner we divest ourselves of the debt incurring mindset in Washington, the sooner we may actually have a say in our future.

The Chinese allow us to exist, because they need us..... for the time being.

The US makes most of the world's food.

Yeah, no doubt. I believe that the reason the US is the world's wealthiest nation is because it has the highest percentage of arable land on earth, and by far the most productive arable land at that.

Originally posted by: wvtalbot
Where did you get this from? As of 2005 the US imports more food than it exports.
This is untrue. The US ended the 2005 calendar year with a $3.5 billion agricultural trade surplus. Text
The trend of the shrinking trade surplus is due to the fact the US mostly exports inexpensive food staples (i.e. wheat, corn, soybeans, etc.) while mostly importing expensive food luxuries (coffee, wine, etc.). One would have to be really working hard to foolishly and intentionally miscontrue the trade data to think that this might pose an impending agricultural crisis, or to believe in Chicken Little-like fashion that the US could ever be starved out by another country.

edit: This thread clearly demonstrates the fallacy of believing that economies are net sum zero.


Actually you are correct, the last time I looked at the data was in 2004 and the USDA predicted a deficet in 2005, which didn't happen, but the trend still continues and I wouldn't be surprise to see little or no surplus for 2006.

For the reasons I stated. Let the world give us coffee and wine, winter produce, and other luxuries. We can live without those. They can't live without our wheat and corn.
 
Originally posted by: Vic
This is untrue. The US ended the 2005 calendar year with a $3.5 billion agricultural trade surplus. Text
The trend of the shrinking trade surplus is due to the fact the US mostly exports inexpensive food staples (i.e. wheat, corn, soybeans, etc.) while mostly importing expensive food luxuries (coffee, wine, etc.). One would have to be really working hard to foolishly and intentionally miscontrue the trade data to think that this might pose an impending agricultural crisis, or to believe in Chicken Little-like fashion that the US could ever be starved out by another country.

Thanks for the backup.

We grow so much food that the government pays farmers NOT to grow food. And we destroy\waste a lot of food too.
 
Back
Top