Wait... we can 'lose' a plane in this day and age?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Linflas

Lifer
Jan 30, 2001
15,395
78
91
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: guyver01
Originally posted by: Xylitol
you can get internet on a plane, yet the plane doesn't upload its location onto the internet/system?

and how is it supposed to do that with no power?

so i guess it did do it until it lost power? the search shouldn't be so hard on open seas...

it took like 70 years to find the titanic

Actually it took 70 years to develop the technology to reach the Titanic wreckage. If they didn't have a pretty good idea of the location of the wreck it would have been a much longer search.
 

skace

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
14,488
7
81
Originally posted by: guyver01
This doesn't sound good, if it's pans out to be related..


Pilots flying a commercial jet from Paris to Rio de Janeiro for Brazil's largest airline, TAM, spotted what they thought was fire in the ocean along the Air France jet's route early Monday, the airline said in a statement e-mailed to The Associated Press.

Brazilian Air Force spokesman Col. Jorge Amaral said authorities were investigating the report, according to the Agencia Brasil official news service.

"There is information that the pilot of a TAM aircraft saw several orange points on the ocean while flying over the region ... where the Air France plane disappeared," Amaral said.

"After arriving in Brazil, the pilot found out about the disappearance (of the Air France plane) and said that he thought those points on the ocean were fire."

So let me get this straight. 1 plane flies a similar route to the original plane that crashed and sees fires similar to the location where the plane was last identified as being. Isn't that where the search should have fucking started at? Color me confused until we get some real information.
 

Mardeth

Platinum Member
Jul 24, 2002
2,608
0
0
The pilot who saw it might not be able to give an accurate location if he didnt write it down or at look at at his location at the time... Also that info might not have reached rexcuers etc. until much later...
 
Nov 7, 2000
16,403
3
81
any bets on what the conspiracy theory will be? GWB? Aliens? Terrists? There was no plane? Missle?

anyways, really sad. fyi, gps doesnt work underwater
 

skace

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
14,488
7
81
Originally posted by: HardcoreRobot
any bets on what the conspiracy theory will be? GWB? Aliens? Terrists? There was no plane? Missle?

anyways, really sad. fyi, gps doesnt work underwater

Giant Shark.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
Originally posted by: Blieb

Cool:
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_...plane_windows_so_small

I heard that they could fly the plane for ~2 hours in a manual mode if they lost electrical.

I just hope they find the people. It's a little creepy to think about human remains just out there ...

yea the 787 has nicer windows, no deep set windows or whatever that even the newest airbus is saddled with. takes carbon fiber to do that.


also from wiki... "On 24 August 2001, Air Transat, Flight 236, an A330-243, performed the world's longest recorded glide with a jet airliner after suffering fuel exhaustion over the Atlantic Ocean. The plane flew powerless for half an hour and covered 65 nautical miles (120 km) to an emergency landing in the Azores (Portugal). No one was hurt, but the aircraft suffered some structural damage and blown tires."

assuming it didn't just fall out of the sky it had plenty of time to go way off course..
 

bsobel

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Dec 9, 2001
13,346
0
0
So let me get this straight. 1 plane flies a similar route to the original plane that crashed and sees fires similar to the location where the plane was last identified as being. Isn't that where the search should have fucking started at? Color me confused until we get some real information.

That is where the search is starting.
 

LordMorpheus

Diamond Member
Aug 14, 2002
6,871
1
0
Another thing, any debris that might be floating aren't going to be staying in one place ... it's amazing how far stuff will move in the ocean.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: iamanidiot
Don't the pilots have aviation watches that send distress signals?

no, but some have a button that calls their mom.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: guyver01
Originally posted by: Xylitol
so i guess it did do it until it lost power? the search shouldn't be so hard on open seas...

go to the beach... wade out about 30 feet ... and float there.. dont do anything except float on your back...
wait about 15 minutes.

you will NOT be where you began, due to current pull.

depending on the current, you could be 100 feet from your position... or 5 miles..

now imagine that in the ocean..

last I checked the beach was at the ocean.
 

coolVariable

Diamond Member
May 18, 2001
3,724
0
76
Originally posted by: sao123
Originally posted by: DrPizza

Okay, let's give them a "last known location" 10 minutes before the actual crash. Or was it 5 minutes? Or 1 minute? 10 minutes of uncertainty, at 600mph, is a huge area. Let's narrow it down & assume that its course didn't change by more than 45 degrees. Under that assumption, 600mph, up to 10 minutes, that leaves an area of 7853 square miles.
For the sake of reference, that's 90% the size of the entire state of New Jersey.


7853 <<<<<<<<<<<< 41,100,000

these guys dont even know which side of the atlantic to look...
it would seem to me that this type 0f hint would be at least SOMEWHAT useful.


its one thing to look for a needle in a haystack, but if you can eliminate 99.99980487% of the haystack to look in, that is a pretty good headstart.


That's what I was saying earlier.
But all the rocket scientists here obviously know better.


Originally posted by: guyver01
Originally posted by: StinkyPinky
Surely they have a backup running off batteries?

and why would you need batteries? in case of power failure? you lose power.. you're gonna crash. not to mention the extra weight it adds to the plane to carry battery backups for vital electronics, etc... and if there's an explosion or fire in the avionics bay, where the batteries would be.. the batteries would melt or be destroyed and be useless anyways..

Doh'.
Just FYI: THAT type of plane has exactly 3 backup systems, including batteries, plus a main electrical system (engine 1, engine 2, emergency turbine, battery).
Any fly-by-wire plane needs backup systems, otherwise: no power => no more steering the plane.
And airplane engineers are saying that it is pretty much impossible for all 4 electrical systems to fail.
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
well they found it. Guess Jacob and the Others will have to entertain them.
 

MixMasterTang

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2001
3,167
176
106
People really should learn more about planes, I have seen so many mis-informed people in this thread it's amazing.

1) Batteries - dumb idea like many people stated above, when the turbine engines shutoff the wind flowing through them can actually act as generators to create energy, so when the electrical system goes out batteries wouldn't be needed just because of a "lack" of power.

2) Taking off and landing is actually much more dangerous than losing some systems at 35,000 feet. As 0roo0roo said above a plane can glide (and generate power) for quite a while.

3) There had to be more than 1 thing that brought this plane down (unless that one thing was a bomb or something).

4) The plane isn't just going to be sitting on top of the water waving a red flag at you, chances are most of it has sunk. The few parts they did find were something like 50 miles apart, there are going to be pieces everywhere. It's also not like they can be out there in 30 minutes to start the search, it's going to take boats 1-2 days to get out there and there are still storms going on.

5) Even if they knew the exact coordinates of the planes last checkin (but they don't since they operate off of Radar and like Bsobel said there is no radar out in the middle of the ocean) where the plane went down, it's very unfortunate in this case but it probably wouldn't help much.
 

CZroe

Lifer
Jun 24, 2001
24,195
857
126
I don't know why people think redundancies, backups, and batteries can solve any electrical system failure. Think about it: A server with a redundant PSU can still lose everything if the main PSU fails spectacularly. What good is a 100% functioning backup PSU if everything you need to power with it is fried? Now, imagine if an electrical problem caused the entire server to "blow up." Obviously, lightning can ignite things and airplanes have combustible fuel.
 

rh71

No Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
52,844
1,049
126
The TWA tragedy over LI took quite a while to investigate and piece together... so long that I went back years later to find out the results. How many of you know the true cause of that one without searching?

This will probably be worse.
 

hiromizu

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2007
3,405
1
0
Is it possible that the plane got lost in a pretty thick cloud and hasn't come out of it?
 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,994
779
126
I'd like to know why the plane didn't try to go around the storm, wtf. Their computers should pick that stuff up, right?