W2K3 SP1 Is Out

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Vegito

Diamond Member
Oct 16, 1999
8,329
0
0
1, its expensive
2, i know windows enough and in 6 year from nt 3.5 to 2003, i called once for exchange 2000.

good practice plus testing = no need to call
 

Smilin

Diamond Member
Mar 4, 2002
7,357
0
0
Originally posted by: forcesho
1, its expensive
2, i know windows enough and in 6 year from nt 3.5 to 2003, i called once for exchange 2000.

good practice plus testing = no need to call

question: if you have a non-bootable server do you fix it or reload?
 

Brazen

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2000
4,259
0
0
Originally posted by: Smilin
Originally posted by: forcesho
1, its expensive
2, i know windows enough and in 6 year from nt 3.5 to 2003, i called once for exchange 2000.

good practice plus testing = no need to call

question: if you have a non-bootable server do you fix it or reload?

hmmm, last time I had a non-bootable server it was a hardware problem.

I concur: good practice plus testing = no need to call.
 

stash

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2000
5,468
0
0
I concur: good practice plus testing = no need to call.

Guess you've never discovered a bug then. Good practice and testing is irrelevant in that case.
 

Brazen

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2000
4,259
0
0
Originally posted by: STaSh
I concur: good practice plus testing = no need to call.

Guess you've never discovered a bug then. Good practice and testing is irrelevant in that case.

I guess I find all the bugs during testing.
 

Brazen

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2000
4,259
0
0
Originally posted by: STaSh
And then what? You can't fix a bug.

What? Are you retarded? No, it gets fixed before going into production. Maybe server administration just isn't your game. I know, how 'bout a SPELLING CONTEST?