- Jan 24, 2002
- 3,497
- 14
- 76
Is there a huge advantage on having 4 gig vram vs 3 gig gaming at 1080p? i.e. the 290 series vs Nvidia 780. Thinking of Witcher 3 and other next gen games.
Nope. Not even an issue at 4K yet. GPU's aren't powerful enough to take advantage of any game that will utilize that much ram at that resolution unless going multi-gpu at 4K. At 1600P and below between 2-3 gigs is all you'll need probably for a few more years.
So would there be a true benifit in designing uncompressed textures if the vram was greater and could use it? I know skyrim uses uncompressed textures in some mods, but is uncompressed vs compressed display a huge difference even at higher resolutions?
yes, there would be a huge benefit because uncompressed textures don't have compression artifacts. Lossy compression sucks and I wish it had never been invented.So would there be a true benifit in designing uncompressed textures if the vram was greater and could use it? I know skyrim uses uncompressed textures in some mods, but is uncompressed vs compressed display a huge difference even at higher resolutions?