[VR-Zone] IVB price cut ahead of launch

chimaxi83

Diamond Member
May 18, 2003
5,457
63
101
Source

Not a huge cut, but savings are savings. That, and I'm a Microcenter buyer, so I'm wondering what the lower prices will translate into.
 

philipma1957

Golden Member
Jan 8, 2012
1,714
0
76
I am thinking it means IVB is not for oc'ers.

It may turn out that the 2600k or 2500k are better then any IVB if you oc. The 2500k may turn out to be a chip that sells at a premium until haswell comes out.
 

bunnyfubbles

Lifer
Sep 3, 2001
12,248
3
0
Even with a very modest IPC boost (say only ~5%) it will take a golden 2500K, 2600K, or 2700K chip to beat a 3570K or 3770K @ 4.5-4.6 and thus new buyers will be likely be better off with Ivy.

Hitting much beyond 4.7 with Sandy is anything but guaranteed.

I don't think the old stock will sell at a premium at all, they might hold their value better than usual but its not like Ivy is a complete flop and can't even hit past 4GHz or something.
 

Subyman

Moderator <br> VC&G Forum
Mar 18, 2005
7,876
32
86
Depending on what the power consumption is, I might be interested in a 3770k over my 2500k. I wasn't able to get huge clocks on my 2500k (which may just be my crappy motherboard.) I'll definitely be getting HT next time.
 

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
Depending on what the power consumption is, I might be interested in a 3770k over my 2500k. I wasn't able to get huge clocks on my 2500k (which may just be my crappy motherboard.) I'll definitely be getting HT next time.
It will be 30% more power efficient but that's where the benefits end. It's a little faster clock-for-clock, but Sandy Bridge looks to overclock higher at lower temps.

They are cutting prices because they are obviously having big problems with Ivy Bridge. I just hope it doesn't affect Haswell as well.
 

Subyman

Moderator <br> VC&G Forum
Mar 18, 2005
7,876
32
86
It will be 30% more power efficient but that's where the benefits end. It's a little faster clock-for-clock, but Sandy Bridge looks to overclock higher at lower temps.

They are cutting prices because they are obviously having big problems with Ivy Bridge. I just hope it doesn't affect Haswell as well.

I have a dedicated watercooling loop, so the heat problems aren't an issue. I'll be interested to see what it hits with a good WC setup. I'd be fine with a daily 4.5.
 

formulav8

Diamond Member
Sep 18, 2000
7,004
522
126
It appears alot of their 22nm hype was, well over hyped. I guess over time it will improve.
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
It will be 30% more power efficient but that's where the benefits end. It's a little faster clock-for-clock, but Sandy Bridge looks to overclock higher at lower temps.

Intel is bumping up TDP to 95W from 77W. :\

Ivy_Bridge_Box_95W.jpg


"At 4.6 - 4.7 Ghz the temperature gets so high the processor throttles, meaning it clocks down to protect the processor from permanent damage. Comparing with Core i7-2600k that in many cases can do 4.8 - 5.0 GHz stable with a good after-market cooler, Ivy Bridge looks to be 200 - 300 Mhz worse than Sandy Bridge." - NordicHardware
 

Tempered81

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2007
6,374
1
81
That has been discussed at length.

The smaller package cannot dissipate heat as fast..

Seems rather silly. That would mean Sandy runs hotter than Nehalem, which is quite the opposite. Do you think IVB's heat could might spur from a revolutionary new non-planar transistor they've never used before?

29f21d20_cpus.png