"..voting is bad for Republican Party candidates"

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,852
4,961
136
That isn't disenfranchisement then. Unless they chased them out of there or made a law denying them the vote then there was no disenfranchisement


Damn, you're thick-headed.

There was no disenfranchisement because they stood in line for hours, refusing to be disenfranchised.

Get it?

Try to follow along, I know it's hard with your rectal-cranial inversion.

DUNCE.jpg
 
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
Damn, you're thick-headed.

There was no disenfranchisement because they stood in line for hours, refusing to be disenfranchised.

Get it?

Try to follow along, I know it's hard with your rectal-cranial inversion.

DUNCE.jpg


They weren't disenfranchised because they were in line to vote

How did the "evil" republicans try to disenfranchise them?
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,852
4,961
136
They weren't disenfranchised because they were in line to vote

How did the "evil" republicans try to disenfranchise them?

Um...by making them wait in line for eight hours to vote?



Dayam, my bathroom faucet has more reading comprehension skills than you.

faucet2.jpg
 
Last edited:

Howard

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
47,982
11
81
That isn't disenfranchisement then. Unless they chased them out of there or made a law denying them the vote then there was no disenfranchisement
What if you had to wait 36 hours in line? As long as you can vote, there's no disenfranchisement, right?

What if you needed to have a foot amputated to vote? Better make it count, eh?
 

Skyclad1uhm1

Lifer
Aug 10, 2001
11,383
87
91
I wonder who's more democratic, the Taliban or the GOP. It's pretty close at least, but then they are pretty similar in their believes anyway.