Voodoo3 2k or Gf 2 mx

[veseli]

Which card is better?
No funny, please.

 

[layne151]

I went from a V3 2k to a Geforce mx and can say it is a MUCH better card. No comparison, the mx wipes the V3 2k.

 

[uncouth]

I can also vouch this

 

[Yoshi]

MX

 

[Angus]

of course, it got to be GeForece Mx

 

[shiznut123]

The Geforce2 MX for sure.

 

[DeathKnightMaF]

MX hands down

 

[BFG10K]

The GF2 MX spanks the Voodoo 3 in every way.

 

[bulldawg]

I made the V3 to MX change. Was blown away with the improvement in image quality.

 

[Regalk]

Why buy the MX when the Radeon LE which is much better and cheaper and can o/c as a full featured DDR Radeon. I have an Asus 7100 GF2MX, A Hercules GF2MX and the Radeon LE and still prefer the Radeon. All my 3dMark scores are higher than the MX scores.

 

[Deeko]

The MX will be much faster and have better 3D than the V3. The V3's only high point in this comparison is that it would have better 2D quality.



<< All my 3dMark scores are higher than the MX scores. >>


Ugh, 3Dmark. NOT useful for comparing different setups.

 

[XGamer]

Anyone with half a brain or basic knowledge of computers, G2 mx easily : /

 

[Mem]

This post seems pointless but to make sure you get the message.
MX
MX
MX
MX
MX
MX
MX
MX
MX
MX

 

[DeathKnightMaF]

Don't you just hate it when people try to change the subject of the post?

<<Why buy the MX when the Radeon LE which is much better and cheaper and can o/c as a full featured DDR Radeon.>>

The original question is which to pick from: the Voodoo3 2k or the GeForce2 MX. I just find it really quite pathetic by the amount of things about Radeons that appears on here. Sure, it's a great line of cards, but come on. Nothing to get so uppity about. You might think that I am an Nvidia fan, and I am, but I wouldn't mind trying other products from ATI or 3dfx if I was given the chance. So don't go flaming me

 

[novice]

This thread is a little redundant, but since I am running two different Geforce 2 MX's in two of my systems and a Voodoo 3 3000 PCI in another one, just let me say that while the Voodoo 3 once proudly wore the budget video performance crown, the king is dead. Long live the new king of the budget performance cards the Geforce 2 MX!! Either the DDR Creative Annihilator 2 MX or my A-Open Geforce 2 MX PA 256 will put the spank on my trusty but aged Voodoo 3. However the Voodoo 3 still does yeoman duty in my celeron 366 system, since it is an &quot;AGP challenged&quot; Intel 810 chipset motherboard. (No AGP slot) Otherwise, we would probably have 3 Geforce 2 MX cards Anyway you cut it, if you have an AGP slot, and not a lot of money, you should have a geforce 2 MX stuck in there. To be fair, I have no experience with the ATI Radeon cards, but still hear persistent rumors about driver issues with ATI cards in general. My MX cards have been trouble free.
Chuck

 

[Rand]

The MX is far and away much faster.

 

[BFG10K]

The V3's only high point in this comparison is that it would have better 2D quality.

Maybe. From what I've seen though, my MX is slightly better at 1024 x 768.