• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Vmodtech (Thai) FULL Fury X Review!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
had a look at some benches before it was taken down. seemed competitive to a 980ti in stock form, but didnt beat it by much if at all in the ones i saw.
 
DDH said:
had a look at some benches before it was taken down. seemed competitive to a 980ti in stock form, but didnt beat it by much if at all in the ones i saw.
Click to expand...

Yeah I got a view of the Witcher 3 4K (the game I currently care about) and it has a decent edge on 980 ti. They focused a lot on OC benchmarks, I don't usually bother overclocking my graphics cards. I prefer to have stability over a couple frames more performance. However it leaves me with some questions:

1. Is the overclock they showed on the 980 ti easily obtainable without raising voltages and messing around alot? Stock cooling?

2. Was that tiny overclock all they could squeeze out of the R9 Fury X? The card is watercooled, I would think it could OC a bit more.
 
slayernine said:
Yeah I got a view of the Witcher 3 4K (the game I currently care about) and it has a decent edge on 980 ti. They focused a lot on OC benchmarks, I don't usually bother overclocking my graphics cards. I prefer to have stability over a couple frames more performance. However it leaves me with some questions:

1. Is the overclock they showed on the 980 ti easily obtainable without raising voltages and messing around alot? Stock cooling?

2. Was that tiny overclock all they could squeeze out of the R9 Fury X? The card is watercooled, I would think it could OC a bit more.
Click to expand...

it was large. over 1300mhz, titan was over 1200. Assuming they were both non boosted clocks.

the 980 oc was over 1300 mhz to and was biting at the heels of the furyx stock.
 
.vodka said:
LOL

Only a few hours to go for useful reviews. 😀
Click to expand...

As sad as this review is for consistency (they probably did 1 pass?) at least they showed stock and OC for most cards.

Why don't all sites do this?

Ryan Smith, why do you not show OC of all competing cards?

I like that this site does this. The numbers they have are questionable, but thank you for showing OC vs Stock for a multitude of cards.

Will Ryan Smith in a few hours show us OC of 980 Ti and Titan X and Fury X and lower performing cards?

Doubtful.

Prove me wrong, Mr. Smith. Punish me if you have OC and Stock for Fury X, Titan X, 980 Ti, 980, and at least another card. I dare you to match a nobody, inconsistent Asian site.
 
Last edited:
crisium said:
As sad as this review is for consistency (they probably did 1 pass?) at least they showed stock and OC for most cards.
Click to expand...

I don't like when sites do this, especially for a new GPU launch. It muddies the water in part because OC'ing is never a sure thing. Stock versus stock, OC'd for all cards in a separate article.
 
I'd rather have a comprehensive review for both stock and OC than to separate the two. It's not that hard to figure out what's what since it's documented.
 
crisium said:
As sad as this review is for consistency (they probably did 1 pass?) at least they showed stock and OC for most cards.

Why don't all sites do this?

Ryan Smith, why do you not show OC of all competing cards?

I like that this site does this. The numbers they have are questionable, but thank you for showing OC vs Stock for a multitude of cards.

Will Ryan Smith in a few hours show us OC of 980 Ti and Titan X and Fury X and lower performing cards?

Doubtful.

Prove me wrong, Mr. Smith. Punish me if you have OC and Stock for Fury X, Titan X, 980 Ti, 980, and at least another card. I dare you to match a nobody, inconsistent Asian site.
Click to expand...



Who's Ryan Smith? Why are you after his life?lol!!

Only 5 hours to go..
 
I have a feeling these guys used an old driver or botched their runs. The numbers don't seem right--I thought I was looking at 390x numbers rather than Fury.


crisium said:
As sad as this review is for consistency (they probably did 1 pass?) at least they showed stock and OC for most cards.

Why don't all sites do this?

Ryan Smith, why do you not show OC of all competing cards?

I like that this site does this. The numbers they have are questionable, but thank you for showing OC vs Stock for a multitude of cards.

Will Ryan Smith in a few hours show us OC of 980 Ti and Titan X and Fury X and lower performing cards?

Doubtful.

Prove me wrong, Mr. Smith. Punish me if you have OC and Stock for Fury X, Titan X, 980 Ti, 980, and at least another card. I dare you to match a nobody, inconsistent Asian site.
Click to expand...



AT did OC their Titan X review sample but it's true that most sites barely dedicate a page to OC results and they are typically very underwhelming.
 
Last edited:
Im patiently waiting for Amd fanboys excuses for another fail...

hint: yes but it runs cooler, yes but its smaller, yes but wait for windows 10 hotfix which will release full power...etc.

Infraction issued for trolling.
-- stahlhart
 
Last edited by a moderator:
vissarix said:
Im patiently waiting for Amd fanboys excuses for another fail...

hint: yes but it runs cooler, yes but its smaller, yes but wait for windows 10 hotfix which will release full power...etc.
Click to expand...

Let's wait for benchmarks from a proper review site before labeling the Fury a 'fail', please.
 
Last edited:
vissarix said:
Im patiently waiting for Amd fanboys excuses for another fail...

hint: yes but it runs cooler, yes but its smaller, yes but wait for windows 10 hotfix which will release full power...etc.

Infraction reversed, because of this:

http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=37504270&postcount=26
http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=37504394&postcount=31
http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=37504903&postcount=48
http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=37504923&postcount=50

Don't even waste your time reporting any more posts here until you start setting a better example in your own posting, hypocrites.

-- stahlhart
Click to expand...

Way to set a proper standard for behavior, moderators. /s

Two wrongs don't make a right.
 
IEC said:
Way to set a proper standard for behavior, moderators. /s

Two wrongs don't make a right.
Click to expand...

You know what? You're right, I stand corrected. I'll see to it that, based on your complaint, the moderation here is doled out impartially and fairly.
-- stahlhart
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top