- Dec 22, 2005
- 126
- 0
- 0
I was reading the other thread on this forum about "feeling the difference" after going to Core 2 Duo. It was stated that for everyday tasks there wasn't much difference.
It got me wondering - I've read Vista is supposed to be written with dual core in mind. Because of that would a Core 2 Duo CPU on Vista vs a single core AMD/Intel CPU result in more of an ability to "feel the difference" for general system use when compared to the same hardware running on Win XP?
In other words - will Vista use the dual cores to full potential?
It got me wondering - I've read Vista is supposed to be written with dual core in mind. Because of that would a Core 2 Duo CPU on Vista vs a single core AMD/Intel CPU result in more of an ability to "feel the difference" for general system use when compared to the same hardware running on Win XP?
In other words - will Vista use the dual cores to full potential?