Vista Beta 2 Minimum Requirements

stevem326

Senior member
Apr 5, 2005
337
0
0
I'm thinking about downloading Vista Beta 2 later this month when it's supposed to be available to the general public (I believe 5/27 is the actual date). Do you think my system below will be able to run it okay? From what I've been able to read, I'm just barely at the minimum requirements, which means it might be slow on my PC.

P4 2.4 GHz CPU
512 MB PC 2100 RAM
80 GB 7,200 HD
64 MB GEForce 4 MX 440 Vid Card
MSI 845-E Max MoBo
On Board sound
 

stevem326

Senior member
Apr 5, 2005
337
0
0
From their website: Vista

Windows Vista Capable PC Hardware
Requirements
Windows Vista Capable PCs need to pass the current certification requirements for Designed for Windows XP logo. In addition, these PCs need the following combination of essential PC hardware for good overall Windows Vista performance:

? CPU ? PC systems should have a modern CPU.

? RAM ? PC systems should have 512MB of memory or more.

? GPU ? PC systems should have a DirectX 9 class graphics processor.


Recommendations
Windows Vista offers significant improvements to the graphics user experience. To take advantage of these advances in the graphics user experience, graphics processor will need to support Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM). Graphics processors capable of supporting WDDM:

? Are designed to ensure that graphics user experience scales up with hardware capabilities.

? Offer improved graphic stability and performance.

? May be able to support additional desktop productivity features.

Windows Vista Capable PC systems would greatly benefit from a graphics processor that will support Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM). Therefore, WDDM support for GPU is a recommended criterion for Windows Vista Capable PCs.

Good, Better, Best Graphics experience when running Windows Vista

Windows Vista will scale with PC hardware capabilities. One of the features that scales with hardware is the desktop graphics experience. Therefore, it is possible to support multiple tiers of graphics user experience on Windows Vista Capable PCs based on hardware configuration.

Good ? PC systems that meet the above requirements of a modern CPU, 512MB RAM and DirectX 9 class GPU should be able to offer a good experience, when upgraded to Windows Vista. They will offer a Windows XP comparable desktop graphics experience with regards to features, stability and performance.

Better ? PCs that use a GPU with WDDM support would provide a better graphics experience - specifically enhanced graphics stability, multi-application performance and monitor hot-plugging - compared to Windows XP, when running any version of Windows Vista. Therefore, we strongly recommend procuring PC systems that include a GPU with WDDM support to get a better desktop graphics experience while running Windows Vista.

Best ? PCs with appropriately configured graphics hardware, as described below, would support Windows Aero user experience that offers additional benefits of enhanced visual quality (glitch-free window redrawing), improved productivity (which includes real-time thumbnail previews, new 3-D task switching, interface scaling, etc.) and visual style (which includes translucent window frames and taskbar, enhanced transitional effects, etc.) when running premium versions of Windows Vista.

To enable Windows Aero, PC systems must meet the following criteria for graphics hardware, with either discrete or UMA solutions:

1. DirectX 9 class graphics hardware that supports WDDM and Pixel Shader 2.0

2. A minimum of 32 bits per pixel

3. Appropriate graphics memory for specified monitor resolutions expressed as total pixels (X dimension multiplied by Y dimension):

1. 64MB of graphics memory to support a single monitor at resolution of 1,310,720 pixels (equivalent to 1280 x 1024) or less

2. 128MB of graphics memory to support a single monitor at resolutions higher than 1,310,720 pixels and less than or equal to 2,304,000 pixels (equivalent to 1920 x 1200)

3. 256MB of graphics memory to support a single monitor at resolutions higher than 2,304,000 pixels

4. Graphics memory bandwidth, as assessed by Windows Vista?s built in system assessment tool WinSAT.EXE, of at least 1,800MB/s at following resolution:

1. Desktop PC: at a monitor resolution of 1,310,720 pixels (equivalent to 1280 x 1024)

2. Mobile PC: at the native resolution of built-in display


 

dawks

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,071
2
81
Your video card will be a limiting factor when running Windows Vista. You wont get the fancy Aero Glass effects. Vista should be able to throttle back its interface features and still run fine on your system.
 

stevem326

Senior member
Apr 5, 2005
337
0
0
Originally posted by: dawks
Your video card will be a limiting factor when running Windows Vista. You wont get the fancy Aero Glass effects. Vista should be able to throttle back its interface features and still run fine on your system.

Thanks, yes it sounds like Vista would run visually in a way similar to XP's graphics but I'd lose out on the Aero effects of Vista.
 

stash

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2000
5,468
0
0
Originally posted by: thescreensavers
My system rated a 3 on there rating system. And it was bit slow on my comp so....

Two things to keep in mind:

1) it's a beta, so how it performs on your computer today does not necessarily give you a good indication of how the final code will run.

2) The system rating uses integer math using the lowest integer value of the sub sections of the rating. So you could have a 5 on 4 out of 5 categories (or however many categories there are, I forget), and a 2 on the last category, and your total score will be 2.

 

InlineFive

Diamond Member
Sep 20, 2003
9,599
2
0
Originally posted by: stash
64-bit required?
No. But if you have a 64-bit box, it would be a good thing to run Vista on it and file bugs.

I will certaintly do that. I just upgraded to a Radeon X800 GTO from a GeForce 4 Ti so I should be set to go. :)
 

Seeruk

Senior member
Nov 16, 2003
986
0
0
Apart from the gfx card (I was using a 6600GT), its the same spec as I use to test some of the earlier beta1's and it ran great once the initial indexing finished.
 

ProviaFan

Lifer
Mar 17, 2001
14,993
1
0
Originally posted by: stash
64-bit required?
No. But if you have a 64-bit box, it would be a good thing to run Vista on it and file bugs.
As an end-user (in other words, not an MSDN subscriber), I'm looking forward to trying beta 2 to see what it brings to the table with regard not only to 64 bit optimizations, but also improvements in dual processor performance (because there are times where I can bog down the XP UI with a couple of intense single-threaded tasks on my X2, and it seems there was some news about Vista having improvements in that area).