• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Vista 64 on 32 System

kmiecmonster

Junior Member
When vista comes out, I'll probably still have the same 32 bit system in place:

Athlon 2600+
Asus A7N8X-X
Radeon 9600 XT
1.5 gb DDR 3200

I have plans to upgrade the system next summer, which should work out nice since Vista should have been our for a few months at that point. In the event that I only want to upgrade the OS, with plans to update hardware at a later date, can I install Vista 64 over my XP Pro 32 setup? Or would I need to buy Vista 32?

Thanks
 
it simply won't work unless you have a 64 bit system. also, vista requires at LEAST

2GB of DDRIII ram
256MB Direct X 10 graphic card
SATA III hard drive

none of theese things exist yet.

Welcome to the anandtech forums, sorry if I sound a bit harsh, i'm just mad at microsoft too.

EDIT: this is what I heard, I don't know I could be wrong
 
Thanks for the info; exactly what I wanted to know. I've actually been a member for 6 years, but lost my password and changed email accounts; so it looks like I'm starting from scratch.
 
Originally posted by: kmiecmonster
Thanks for the info; exactly what I wanted to know. I've actually been a member for 6 years, but lost my password and changed email accounts; so it looks like I'm starting from scratch.


ah, okay, who were you before you switched?
 
Originally posted by: Crescent13
it simply won't work unless you have a 64 bit system. also, vista requires at LEAST

2GB of DDRIII ram
256MB Direct X 10 graphic card
SATA III hard drive

none of theese things exist yet.

Welcome to the anandtech forums, sorry if I sound a bit harsh, i'm just mad at microsoft too.

EDIT: this is what I heard, I don't know I could be wrong

I'm pretty sure they are not the minimum requirements for Vista - I have been beta testing (MSDN) quite happily on a 2.5g P4 with 1GB of RAM

http://www.dvhardware.net/article6056.html
 
Originally posted by: spherrod
Originally posted by: Crescent13
it simply won't work unless you have a 64 bit system. also, vista requires at LEAST

2GB of DDRIII ram
256MB Direct X 10 graphic card
SATA III hard drive

none of theese things exist yet.

Welcome to the anandtech forums, sorry if I sound a bit harsh, i'm just mad at microsoft too.

EDIT: this is what I heard, I don't know I could be wrong

I'm pretty sure they are not the minimum requirements for Vista - I have been beta testing (MSDN) quite happily on a 2.5g P4 with 1GB of RAM

http://www.dvhardware.net/article6056.html


Yes, they definatly will not outlaw 99% of computer systems. Windows Vista will scale to lower end hardware, though probably not as low as XP.. but it will work on many of the current systems.

Avalon, or the new fancy accelerated interface will automatically adjust its feature set based on the current video cards capabilities.
 
Originally posted by: dawks
Originally posted by: spherrod
Originally posted by: Crescent13
it simply won't work unless you have a 64 bit system. also, vista requires at LEAST

2GB of DDRIII ram
256MB Direct X 10 graphic card
SATA III hard drive

none of theese things exist yet.

Welcome to the anandtech forums, sorry if I sound a bit harsh, i'm just mad at microsoft too.

EDIT: this is what I heard, I don't know I could be wrong

I'm pretty sure they are not the minimum requirements for Vista - I have been beta testing (MSDN) quite happily on a 2.5g P4 with 1GB of RAM

http://www.dvhardware.net/article6056.html


Yes, they definatly will not outlaw 99% of computer systems. Windows Vista will scale to lower end hardware, though probably not as low as XP.. but it will work on many of the current systems.

Avalon, or the new fancy accelerated interface will automatically adjust its feature set based on the current video cards capabilities.

okay, thanks for clearing that up.
 
Originally posted by: dawks
Yes, they definatly will not outlaw 99% of computer systems. Windows Vista will scale to lower end hardware, though probably not as low as XP.. but it will work on many of the current systems.

Avalon, or the new fancy accelerated interface will automatically adjust its feature set based on the current video cards capabilities.
Well, if prior major OS releases have been any indication, it seems that all of the hardware mfgs get onboard to essentially use the OS upgrade to drive hardware re-purchases/upgrades as well, so don't count on being able to run Vista on today's hardware at all well.. it will probably be like running Win95 on a 386 with 4-8MB of RAM - something that could run Win3.1 fairly well, but runs like a dog with Win9x.

Don't forget, too, that Vista will be the first version of Windows with DRM integrated and embedded into it. Depending on how MS decides to proceed with their DRM plans, and whatever deals that they make with the record and movie industry bigwigs, you may find that you do need to purchase a brand-new PC to run Vista, because only those systems will contain the necessary hardware underpinnings for the DRM system in the system chipset and CPU. MS did nearly the same thing with XP MCE, by not selling it as a normal upgrade (until recently, after much outcry), but only bundled with new OEM systems, with special hardware (hardware PVR support) onboard.

I'm not planning on ever running Vista, I've made up my mind already. I prefer to support at least minimally-open systems. While I've been an MS customer in the past, I've decided to draw the line here. Hey, I'm sure that there are still some WordPerfect for DOS users out there somewhere too, and a handful of classic Amiga users too... so I'm in good company. 😛

Edit: Interesting thread in the Video forum related to HDCP content-protection of HD-DVD video here which backs up my assertion.
 
Guys why speculate on something you obviously know little about?

I am running the 5219 Ultimate preview on a

2800 AMD64
512mb DDR ram
Radeon 9600

And thats with all bells and whistles like aero and even WinFS. Considering its VERY early beta you can assume that performance will improve and yet the rig above runs it fast and stable, yet with only half my hardware running any kind of specific driver!

BF2 plays at a comfortable rate with relatively low specs for the game so I fail to see where these wild guesstimates of specs come from
 
Back
Top