ok, let's see
john carmack:
"On the topic of current Nvidia cards:
Do not buy a GeForce4-MX for Doom.
Nvidia has really made a mess of the naming conventions here. I always
thought it was bad enough that GF2 was just a speed bumped GF1, while GF3 had
significant architectural improvements over GF2. I expected GF4 to be the
speed bumped GF3, but calling the NV17 GF4-MX really sucks.
GF4-MX will still run Doom properly, but it will be using the NV10 codepath
with
only two texture units and no vertex shaders. A GF3 or 8500 will be
much better performers. The GF4-MX may still be the card of choice for many
people depending on pricing, especially considering that many games won't use
four textures and vertex programs, but ____, I wish they had named it
something else.
As usual, there will be better cards available from both Nvidia and ATI by the
time we ship the game.
8:50 pm addendum: Mark Kilgard at Nvidia said that the current drivers already
support the vertex program option to be invarint with the fixed function path,
and that it turned out to be one instruction FASTER, not slower."
and
Final Words
"As we just alluded to, the Radeon 7500 is in desperate need of a price cut or a performance boost. Although it can easily outperform the GeForce2 Ti 200, it is priced competitively with the GeForce3 Ti 200; and the GeForce3 Ti 200 can clearly outperform it while offering full DirectX 8 support (which will hopefully matter someday)."
hope i linked these right...
btw a radeon 64ddr for $35 IS AN EXCELLENT DEAL.