Virtualization Server: AMD X8 FX-8350 is it OK?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Apr 20, 2008
10,067
990
126
I would recommend anything that has more than 4 phases for a 8350. My FX-8150 @ 4ghz throttled like crazy on a Biostar TA970XE and you could hear the chokes squealing when it was throttling. MSI 990XA-GD55 is a great budget option.

My FX-8350 on the Biostar ta-970 doesn't do that at all. Is bulldozer that much harder on the motherboard compared to the piledriver class?
 

TeknoBug

Platinum Member
Oct 2, 2013
2,084
31
91
When it comes to virtualization for me, it needs to have direct I/O to hardware (VT-d or AMD-v/IOMMU). VM's don't perform 100% without those. I use an i5 3550 which has VT-d.

But for tinkering or testing an OS, sure whatever works- I do that on my i7 3770K.

PS- 970A-D3 doesn't play nice with 8-core CPU's because it's 4-phase. It'll run fine at stock clock but the VRM modules do get hot so adequate cooling is needed.
 
Last edited:

Zstream

Diamond Member
Oct 24, 2005
3,395
277
136
hello,
I wanted to revive the thread also

I managed to get
AMD fx-8320
asus sabertooth 990fx r2.0
crucial 1600 cl9 4+4GB ram
ATI HD5870

I wanted to use this build for visualization (as my bachelors thesis), some gpgpu/opencl, and also for games (I couldn't resist of course :D )

I would like to know, if you used any patches for hypervisors. Because of AMDs little different approach with the CPU architecture and the fact, that more software is fine-tuned for intel cpus. The thing is FX-8320 cpu is made of 4 modules, they both have 2 integer cores and 2 128bit FPUs but one L2 cache. This means that FX-8320 has 8 real cores, but software need to be tuned to be efficiently computed. (similar to intels hyper threading but with real cores) So both cores in a module need to work on "similar task" to run efficiently.
Did you get any experiences with this? I would really like to hear about your setup and how is it performing.

Thank you



I've used many AMD CPUs for hyper-v cluster builds. I've only had a few random blue screens but that was due to the io controller being used. The vms run just fine from a performance pov, especially when you limit the max resource usage. I had six vms running on a 8150 with no issues.
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
22,937
13,024
136
A program using 100% of 8 cores is generally rare.

Sounds like your 8350 is a perfect candidate for ChipAbuse!. If you thought Prime95 was bad . . .

PS- 970A-D3 doesn't play nice with 8-core CPU's because it's 4-phase. It'll run fine at stock clock but the VRM modules do get hot so adequate cooling is needed.

The GA 970A-ud3 is an 8+2 phase board:

http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3907#ov

That's why so many people recommend them as a budget option for octocore FX processors.
 
Dec 30, 2004
12,553
2
76
My 8350 @stock (4.2 turbo) averaged 45C-50C in most games. Thats was with a Noctua 12U heatsink/fan in a $50 rosewill case.

yes, that's a much better cooler. And also, most games don't make effective use of the CPU compared with video encoding, rendering, etc.
 
Dec 30, 2004
12,553
2
76
When it comes to virtualization for me, it needs to have direct I/O to hardware (VT-d or AMD-v/IOMMU). VM's don't perform 100% without those. I use an i5 3550 which has VT-d.

But for tinkering or testing an OS, sure whatever works- I do that on my i7 3770K.

PS- 970A-D3 doesn't play nice with 8-core CPU's because it's 4-phase. It'll run fine at stock clock but the VRM modules do get hot so adequate cooling is needed.

given the amount of RAM I have I'd much rather have virtualized diskspace taking 4GB of memory-- access latency is non-existent then.

Oracle's VM is crap but VMWare is a dream
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
22,937
13,024
136
Might be. I don't think I've seen anyone recommend the D3 though, the 970A-ud3 is the "hot item" for discount FX machines thesedays. So is the new-ish 970 board from ASRock.