Originally posted by: bluewall21
Read this.
A program instruction on an Intel 386 or later CPU can address up to 4GB of memory, using its full 32 bits
What if you actually HAVE 4GB of RAM?
f you set the system to use no page file space at all in that case, would you gain any performance?
Really though, the pagefile+RAM size cannot exceed 4GB (Im assuming this has not changes since Win95x32, as I haven't tried since)
Programs WILL use your pagefile, but you can minimize it by setting the pagefile to equal sizes both minimal AND maximum...(1500mb or so, assuming you have 1024mb ram, or so ive read)
Originally posted by: DJFury
so if you have 2gb of memory should you or should you not turn off virtual memory?
Originally posted by: SirOblivious
i've wondered this myself. If say you got 2gb of ram, why the hell would you run out of memory and have to write to the drive?
Originally posted by: DJFury
OK thanks. When i hit Ctrl+Alt+Del and check performance it shows PF usage consistently at 1+ gb (I'm assuming this is the virtual memory?) and about 100-200mb of free physical memory, and I already have 1gb installed. I usually have the following running simultaneously:
iTunes
Winamp
MS Money
Outlook
Firefox (w/ 7-10 tabs)
AIM
Virus Protection
Steam for Counterstrike
Limewire
Windows Explorer w/ thousands of songs showing ID3 details (title, author, genre, duration, etc.)
MS Messenger (w/ webcam sometimes)
I don't know if all that justifies a consistent 1.4gb PF usage, but that's what I'm getting so I ordered another GB of memory. I currently have a 3.4ghz P4, hopefully it'll help.