• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

violent eco-terrorists in protest

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
So you're supporting violent protests against the rule of law because you agree with the protesters. Good to know.

What have you got against our founding fathers? Do you ever think about what is just and what isn't and whether it's worth fighting for? I'm not taking a stand one way or the other on this issue. I don't know anything. But I sure can see you parse the issue wrong.
 
What have you got against our founding fathers? Do you ever think about what is just and what isn't and whether it's worth fighting for? I'm not taking a stand one way or the other on this issue. I don't know anything. But I sure can see you parse the issue wrong.

It's Canada Moonie, C-a-n-a-d-a.
 
"Glad" to see you're supporting violating peoples' rights and driving them from their lands, police brutality and environmental destruction...

and you're a fucking bag of lying shit. They are protesting the exploration of an area that's not even theirs. They are using guns and bombs and violence and physical threats and intimidation and you're another piece of liberal/progressive/Democrat garbage that supports violent protests.
 
anti fracking eco-KOOKS following their usual alarmist sky is falling agenda. When it was all said and over they drove their internal combustion vehicles home and yacked on their cell phones all the way. Turned on all kinds of lights / big screen TV's (to watch their eco-KOOK protest) used natural gas to heat their multi story buildings and cooked beef on gas burner ranges. Just another example of liberal intellectual bankruptcy and their highly consistent hypocrisy.

avatar61771_1.gif


Sorry for the off topic but what is that a picture of?
 
I'll quote you again:
2timer said

Trying to justify the use of bombs and guns and violent protests against the government.

And you keep avoiding the point. The same government that cracks down on protests while their lands are invaded and stolen. So yeah, keep telling yourself they're insane criminals, it just illustrates how dishonest and deceptive a person you are
 
And you keep avoiding the point. The same government that cracks down on protests while their lands are invaded and stolen. So yeah, keep telling yourself they're insane criminals, it just illustrates how dishonest and deceptive a person you are

I never said they were insane criminals, I said they were using terrorism (fire bombs) and violence (bombs and shootings) in a political protest. You are the one that is defending and trying to justify the use of deadly force and violence in a political protest.
 
I never said they were insane criminals, I said they were using terrorism (fire bombs) and violence (bombs and shootings) in a political protest. You are the one that is defending and trying to justify the use of deadly force and violence in a political protest.

Got it. I don't know much about the history of the Elsipogtog First Nation, but if it's anything like the history of Native Americans here then the real issue is whether or not their land is being stolen and exploited by these fracking companies. According to the first link, the police arrived with their guns drawn. Don't you think that's a little provocative on their part?
 
I don't think the government of Canada qualifies as tyrannical. Have you ever seen Canadian Bacon? Good movie.
 
and you're a fucking bag of lying shit.
Oh yeah? Well I'd rather be that (as described by you) than a goose-stepping, authoritarian bootlicker apologist like you.

They are protesting the exploration of an area that's not even theirs.
That's not what the woman in the previously linked youtube video claims, but it doesn't really matter, because when an authoritarian government (eagerly applauded by conscience- and morals-devoided people like you) decides they want a piece of land they'll write that on a piece of paper and suddenly it's theirs. So whoop-de-doo, so much for your apologist logic.

They are using guns and bombs and violence and physical threats and intimidation
...And the government isn't? Yeah yeah, I know... "Rule of law", eh? THEIR use of violence is legally sanctioned, so that makes it okay. Tell that to the jews of europe in the 1930s and 40s. Tell that to the natives of the americas, australia and new zeeland in the 1500s onwards, former colonies in africa, asia and so on. Rule of law > everything else, yes? Well. WHOSE rule of law? The Man's! That's who. Write a law and then stomp out all resistance! That's life in Monovillage's apologist world. So clear and simple that even he can comprehend.

and you're another piece of liberal/progressive/Democrat garbage that supports violent protests.
I'm nothing of the sort you ignorant nitwit. To you, "liberal" and "democrat" are just insults you fling poop-fashion like a monkey at people who actually have half a brain, who won't march lock-step with Big Business or The Man. I'm nothing like an american liberal or democrat.

Oh, and I support peoples' right to defend their lifestyle and/or property against authoritarian oppression. If violence is what it takes, then so be it.
 
Trolling in your own thread, you have no shame. 😛

Anyways, enjoy your dishonesty and keep telling yourself it's all true. Lol...

Not trolling my own thread, you were about the only dumbfuck that responded and tried to justify violent protests using firebombs and shooting at the police. I expect you to use the "Imperialist running dogs" or "capitalist pigs" next.
 
Back
Top