Vigilante Father Facing Murder Charge

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,544
924
126
Text

A man facing a murder charge for shooting and killing a motorcyclist who he thought was stalking his daughters is now under investigation for other altercations where he may have had an itchy trigger finger, Georgia law enforcement officials have told ABC News.

"We've got a lot of phone calls from people," Oconee County Sheriff Scott Berry told ABC News. "There are other incidents where shots were fired."

Richard Gear now sits in a Georgia jail facing a murder charge after he fatally shot 21-year-old motorcyclist Bryan Joseph "B.J." Mough Monday evening in front of his home. Gear said he acted in self-defense.

Berry said that Gear's two daughters, 17 and 19, called their father as they drove home from an Athens, Ga., Target store to tell him that they had gotten into some sort of road rage dispute with Mough, who was on a motorcycle, in the store's parking lot.

Unintended Victim of Vigilante Justice?

Meanwhile police are looking into other incidents that may have involved Gear and gunshots. One occurred in February 2006, when Oconee deputies responded to a call at Gear's Bogart, Ga., home. The 45-year-old Gear told authorities that his mailbox had been damaged when people he did not know had pulled out of his driveway after he asked them to leave.

When authorities located the people in question, they admitted to accidentally driving over Gear's mailbox, but said it only happened because they were hurrying from the property after shots were fired at them.

Berry's office was never able to bring charges against Gear because police could not prove he fired a gun, and the witnesses would not fully cooperate in the investigation.

Detectives will re-examine that case, Berry said, as well as others.

In Monday's shooting death, Mough apparently followed the girls out of the Target lot and at some point, according to Berry, the Nissan Sentra driven by Gear's daughters made contact with the motorcycle. The girls admitted to authorities that they made obscene hand gestures at Mough during the encounter.

Mough then followed the teens to their family's home, where Berry said Gear "was waiting at the end of the driveway with a .40-caliber semiautomatic." Mough made one pass of the house and on the return pass, Berry said, Gear unloaded multiple shots at Mough, one of which struck him in the back.

Gear called 911 to report to police that he had shot someone in front of his house, Berry said. Mough was transported to a local hospital, where he was declared dead. Deputies arrested Gear Monday night and charged him with murder.

Gear, who is being held without bond, told authorities he was acting in self-defense when he killed Mough. As of this morning, he had not retained legal counsel, Berry said. He has no prior criminal record. he added. The phone number at Gear's Bogart address is no longer working.

A team of deputies will try to reconstruct the alleged accident in the hope that they might determine whether it was the teenage daughters or the motorcyclist that initiated the contact. Berry said it's unlikely, however, that a moving bike would go after a car. "It would be unusual for a motorcycle to ram a four wheel vehicle," he said.

As for Gear's self-defense claims, Berry also said he had doubts about that.

"I don't know how you can legally shoot someone in the back on a motorcycle," Berry said, "and then claim he was was trying to run you down."

What a piece of shit. I sincerely hope he rots in prison for a long time. :|

Chalk this one up as just another "law-abiding" gun owner with anger management issues and tiny penis syndrome.

More information on the guy who was murdered here:

http://www.blokessportbike.com/showthread.php?t=27314

http://www.georgiasportbike.com/showthread.php?t=3056
 

Demon-Xanth

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
20,551
2
81
*gets out an asbestos suit, an aluminum lawn chair, and sets out a bag of popcorn to be cooked by the flames*
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
this is one guy who should not have had a gun. but to lump him in with all other's that own a gun is stupid.


i disagree that he should rot in prison for a long time. he should sit long enought for the electric chair to warm up or them set up the needles.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,544
924
126
Originally posted by: waggy
this is one guy who should not have had a gun. but to lump him in with all other's that own a gun is stupid.


i disagree that he should rot in prison for a long time. he should sit long enought for the electric chair to warm up or them set up the needles.

I concur.
 

Regs

Lifer
Aug 9, 2002
16,665
21
81
Sounds like he had annoying neighbors. Though shooting them all is not the best solution.
 

hanoverphist

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2006
9,867
23
76
"When a guy on a Harley doesn't return "the wave" I just assume he is too scared to take his hand off the handlebars."

lol or he doesnt like you. i used to wave at guys on harleys to see if they would wave to a guy on a honda. most do, ones wearing colors usually didnt.

as for this guy, ya hes a piece of shit for what he did, but i bet theres a ton more to this story than is in that short article. i bet the daughters are dbags as well, but dont turn this into your own personal vehicle to bash legal gun owners.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,544
924
126
Well, I didn't realize that this had happened almost a year ago but was brought back up because the guy was finally convicted and sentenced to life plus 5 years.

That doesn't bring back the guy who was murdered though...:(

WATKINSVILLE - An Oconee County Superior Court jury convicted a Bogart man of murder and aggravated assault on Monday for shooting a motorcyclist in the back and killing him last winter.

Richard Harold ?Ricky? Gear, was sentenced to life plus five years for malice murder, felony murder and aggravated assault in the Feb. 25 death of Bryan Joseph ?B.J.? Mough of Winder.

Attorneys made closing arguments Monday morning in the two-week trial.

District Attorney Ken Mauldin argued that Gear acted with premeditation.

Though Gear?s daughters called their mother to say a man was following them on Atlanta Highway and collided with their car, Gear had time to dial 911 or make sure his relatives were safely in the house, Mauldin said. He also didn?t know that the man his daughters called about was driving a motorcycle, Mauldin said.

?(Gear) didn?t know that a motorcycle had anything to do with his daughters,? he said. ?He didn?t know if (Mough) was someone who happened to turn down the wrong place at the wrong time.

?His first instinct was to shoot? before getting more information from his daughters Chelsea and Samantha Gear, Mauldin argued.

Gear fired his gun twice as Mough drove by, and a third time when the biker made a second pass from the other direction.

?This case was about a man who shot first, who shot last and shot in between, and didn?t ask questions before and didn?t ask questions later,? the prosecutor said.

Defense attorney Edward Tolley argued that Mough was the aggressor, and the motorcyclist could have continued straight on Atlanta Highway toward home, instead of following Gear?s daughters into Bogart.

Even after Gear fired two warning shots at the passing biker, Tolley argued, Mough turned around and drove straight at Gear, who jumped backward and fired a third time, killing Mough.

?The only reason we are here is because this man did not want to back down,? Tolley told jurors. ?We are here because Bryan Mough did not know how to back down.?

Prosecution witnesses testified that bikers wearing a full helmet and face mask might not hear gunshots, especially over engine and wind noise.

Though Chelsea Gear admittedly made a vulgar hand gesture at Mough, Tolley argued that was irrelevant.

?I wish she hadn?t done it, but that?s not what this case is about,? the defense attorney said. ?You have to know what Richard Gear knew at the time, not what Chelsea Gear did on the highway.?

Gear admitted Wednesday that he didn?t know that Mough was the man who had followed his daughters, telling jurors that ?you would?ve had to have been there? to understand the feeling he had, which was ?something I can?t put into words.?

Mauldin argued that the evidence didn?t fit a self-defense claim because, among other things, investigators determined that Mough?s motorcycle never drove onto Gear?s property.

?It was on the roadway, where it had every right to be,? he said.

The jury of nine women and three men began deliberating in mid-afternoon and came to a quick verdict.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
http://www.onlineathens.com/st...08/new_362441521.shtml

WATKINSVILLE - An Oconee County Superior Court jury convicted a Bogart man Monday of murder and aggravated assault for shooting a motorcyclist in the back and killing him last winter.

Richard Harold "Ricky" Gear was sentenced to life plus five years in prison for malice murder, felony murder, aggravated assault and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime in the Feb. 25 death of Bryan Joseph "B.J." Mough of Winder.

Gear, 46, claimed he shot in self-defense after 21-year-old Mough followed his daughters home and tried to run him down as he stood in his own driveway.

But District Attorney Ken Mauldin argued Gear acted with premeditation when he shot Mough.

After listening to 46 witnesses and reviewing more than 500 pieces of evidence since the trial began Nov. 17, a jury of nine women and three men took just three and a half hours to return a guilty verdict.
."

Mauldin argued the evidence didn't fit a self-defense claim because, among other things, investigators found Mough's motorcycle never drove onto Gear's property.

"It was on the roadway, where it had every right to be," he said.









so the bastard was found guilty.


lol beat by a few minutes. would have beat jules if i didnt have to get a bowel of grapes for my son LOL

good ot see the bastard got life. still think the chair is what he should have got
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,544
924
126
Originally posted by: hanoverphist
"When a guy on a Harley doesn't return "the wave" I just assume he is too scared to take his hand off the handlebars."

lol or he doesnt like you. i used to wave at guys on harleys to see if they would wave to a guy on a honda. most do, ones wearing colors usually didnt.

as for this guy, ya hes a piece of shit for what he did, but i bet theres a ton more to this story than is in that short article. i bet the daughters are dbags as well, but dont turn this into your own personal vehicle to bash legal gun owners.

I thought the story was pertinent to a recent discussion about gun ownership and CCW. Just shows that not all law-abiding gun owners are stable individuals who should be allowed to carry guns...nor should they all be trusted simply because some local authority issued them a piece of paper saying they can carry a gun.

Fact is, this guy had no criminal record and he obviously had no business owning firearms.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: hanoverphist
"When a guy on a Harley doesn't return "the wave" I just assume he is too scared to take his hand off the handlebars."

lol or he doesnt like you. i used to wave at guys on harleys to see if they would wave to a guy on a honda. most do, ones wearing colors usually didnt.

as for this guy, ya hes a piece of shit for what he did, but i bet theres a ton more to this story than is in that short article. i bet the daughters are dbags as well, but dont turn this into your own personal vehicle to bash legal gun owners.

I thought the story was pertinent to a recent discussion about gun ownership and CCW. Just shows that not all law-abiding gun owners are stable individuals who should be allowed to carry guns...nor should they all be trusted simply because some local authority issued them a piece of paper saying they can carry a gun.

Fact is, this guy had no criminal record and he obviously had no business owning firearms.

i agree he shouldnt. but you can't restrict everyones because one person is a nutcase. odds are this guy would have had guns either legally or not. it seems he (and his family) are nuts.
 

lokiju

Lifer
May 29, 2003
18,526
5
0
Wow another anti-gun thread?

:totalshock:


What this nut job did was clearly wrong though.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,035
18,324
146
Originally posted by: lokiju
Wow another anti-gun thread?

:totalshock:

Yep. That damn gun jumped up and shot that biker all by itself!
 

imported_Imp

Diamond Member
Dec 20, 2005
9,148
0
0
Hope the piece of shit enjoys dropping the soap.

So, did the daughters nearly run over the motorcyclist cause they 'didn't see him'?
 

m1ldslide1

Platinum Member
Feb 20, 2006
2,321
0
0
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
I thought the story was pertinent to a recent discussion about gun ownership and CCW. Just shows that not all law-abiding gun owners are stable individuals who should be allowed to carry guns...nor should they all be trusted simply because some local authority issued them a piece of paper saying they can carry a gun.

Fact is, this guy had no criminal record and he obviously had no business owning firearms.


Also from this story you can conclude that many legal vehicle operators are not stable individuals that should be allowed to share the road. In addition, obviously not all children-owners are stable individuals that should be allowed to raise a child. What are you gonna do though? I'm all ears for realistic solutions to violent crime, and I think that very few of them involve revoking CCW's and trying to take away Bubba's sidearm.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: Imp
Hope the piece of shit enjoys dropping the soap.

So, did the daughters nearly run over the motorcyclist cause they 'didn't see him'?

either that or they were flirting with him and then he wouldnt leave them alone and they freaked out.

 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,035
18,324
146
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus


I thought the story was pertinent to a recent discussion about gun ownership and CCW. Just shows that not all law-abiding gun owners are stable individuals who should be allowed to carry guns...nor should they all be trusted simply because some local authority issued them a piece of paper saying they can carry a gun.

Fact is, this guy had no criminal record and he obviously had no business owning firearms.

With freedom comes risk. All kinds of risk.

Take away all the risks, and you take away all the freedoms.

I rather be free and accept risks than be oppressed and have total safety.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Sometimes I stare at my guns for hours at a time waiting for them to kill someone. They're so lazy, all they do is sit there. I'm starting to think none of them has the guts to kill a person. Especially that Buckmark. What a wuss.
 

hanoverphist

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2006
9,867
23
76
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: hanoverphist
"When a guy on a Harley doesn't return "the wave" I just assume he is too scared to take his hand off the handlebars."

lol or he doesnt like you. i used to wave at guys on harleys to see if they would wave to a guy on a honda. most do, ones wearing colors usually didnt.

as for this guy, ya hes a piece of shit for what he did, but i bet theres a ton more to this story than is in that short article. i bet the daughters are dbags as well, but dont turn this into your own personal vehicle to bash legal gun owners.

I thought the story was pertinent to a recent discussion about gun ownership and CCW. Just shows that not all law-abiding gun owners are stable individuals who should be allowed to carry guns...nor should they all be trusted simply because some local authority issued them a piece of paper saying they can carry a gun.

Fact is, this guy had no criminal record and he obviously had no business owning firearms.

but would he have been so squeaky clean if those other incidents in question after the fact had been pursued at the time? either way, this guy was a threat to society with his gun, that is not in question. i dont see it pertinent to the discussion at hand about legal gun ownership tho, especially when presented as biased as your remarks made it. your OP made me think that you thought every gun owner would do the same in that situation, which is not true or accurate. although i bet he would have gotten along with that soccer mom packin heat.
 

crystal

Platinum Member
Nov 5, 1999
2,424
0
0
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: hanoverphist
"When a guy on a Harley doesn't return "the wave" I just assume he is too scared to take his hand off the handlebars."

lol or he doesnt like you. i used to wave at guys on harleys to see if they would wave to a guy on a honda. most do, ones wearing colors usually didnt.

as for this guy, ya hes a piece of shit for what he did, but i bet theres a ton more to this story than is in that short article. i bet the daughters are dbags as well, but dont turn this into your own personal vehicle to bash legal gun owners.

I thought the story was pertinent to a recent discussion about gun ownership and CCW. Just shows that not all law-abiding gun owners are stable individuals who should be allowed to carry guns...nor should they all be trusted simply because some local authority issued them a piece of paper saying they can carry a gun.

Fact is, this guy had no criminal record and he obviously had no business owning firearms.

Fact is, he can own any guns allow under the laws as he wants. He went about shooting a guy dead, then that's where I hope he rots in jail.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: hanoverphist
"When a guy on a Harley doesn't return "the wave" I just assume he is too scared to take his hand off the handlebars."

lol or he doesnt like you. i used to wave at guys on harleys to see if they would wave to a guy on a honda. most do, ones wearing colors usually didnt.

as for this guy, ya hes a piece of shit for what he did, but i bet theres a ton more to this story than is in that short article. i bet the daughters are dbags as well, but dont turn this into your own personal vehicle to bash legal gun owners.

I thought the story was pertinent to a recent discussion about gun ownership and CCW. Just shows that not all law-abiding gun owners are stable individuals who should be allowed to carry guns...nor should they all be trusted simply because some local authority issued them a piece of paper saying they can carry a gun.

Fact is, this guy had no criminal record and he obviously had no business owning firearms.

How exactly does a concealed permit figure into this?

You're right though, he obviously had no business with a weapon. Still, that's the price you pay for living in a large, free society.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,544
924
126
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Sometimes I stare at my guns for hours at a time waiting for them to kill someone. They're so lazy, all they do is sit there. I'm starting to think none of them has the guts to kill a person. Especially that Buckmark. What a wuss.

:laugh: