• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Vietnam

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
You want me and everyone here believe that because nothing has happened since 9/11 that GWB, the War and Iraq, or God himself has anything to do with it? Give me a friggen break.
By this logic, no one is to blame for 9/11, nor could Kerry have any tangible influence on terrorist attacks if he takes office. Terror attacks are completely random events that occur in a vacuum outside the realm of influence of Americans. You also assume that out the zillions of terrorists that are out there, they're only capable of plotting one thing at a time, so obviously it must be several years after 9/11 before they can attack again. :beer: I actually chuckled while reading your post.
 

vanln

Member
Aug 1, 2002
180
0
0
Correct me if i'm wrong

People who keep bring the Vietnam war . Their only intention is to show other people has a clue about how smart Kerry is . If any one has a good education of Vietnam war . They all know the fall of south VN lead to the victory of cold war . Kerry did not have any ideal how to play a role of a political war . That is why he ran for his heoric protestor of war . That is the exact image of a person can not be a chief of command . Kerry run politic for his own good . Not for the country
That is the image of a young Kerry

A Kerry as now
let see how Bush told people . He voted for iraq war and now he doesn't . Another image of a Kerry ( not change) after so many year run for politic. To bad he is the same guy don't know how to play politic war . He can be a good senator , but for a president position, he doesn't fit
I don't like Bush when he keep telling poeple about Kerry vote yes and no . I know exactly what he want to mean . I'm not that dump ok Bush . Well, I could not blame bush . So many don't know what he talking about
 

CaptnKirk

Lifer
Jul 25, 2002
10,053
0
71
Van -

You can't compose a coherent english sentance.
You ramble about historical events that went down before you were born.
And you don't know shit.

Go play in traffic.
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
You want me and everyone here believe that because nothing has happened since 9/11 that GWB, the War and Iraq, or God himself has anything to do with it? Give me a friggen break.
By this logic, no one is to blame for 9/11, nor could Kerry have any tangible influence on terrorist attacks if he takes office. Terror attacks are completely random events that occur in a vacuum outside the realm of influence of Americans. You also assume that out the zillions of terrorists that are out there, they're only capable of plotting one thing at a time, so obviously it must be several years after 9/11 before they can attack again. :beer: I actually chuckled while reading your post.

Not nearly as much as I did when I read your original. You logic is flawed and speculative at best. You think that Bush has made the country safer. Admit it. Fact is, we are no safer today than we were 3 years ago. Nor will we be any safer when Kerry takes office.
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
Originally posted by: umbrella39
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
You want me and everyone here believe that because nothing has happened since 9/11 that GWB, the War and Iraq, or God himself has anything to do with it? Give me a friggen break.
By this logic, no one is to blame for 9/11, nor could Kerry have any tangible influence on terrorist attacks if he takes office. Terror attacks are completely random events that occur in a vacuum outside the realm of influence of Americans. You also assume that out the zillions of terrorists that are out there, they're only capable of plotting one thing at a time, so obviously it must be several years after 9/11 before they can attack again. :beer: I actually chuckled while reading your post.

Not nearly as much as I did when I read your original. You logic is flawed and speculative at best. You think that Bush has made the country safer. Admit it. Fact is, we are no safer today than we were 3 years ago. Nor will we be any safer when Kerry takes office.
Your problem is when you say 'Fact is,' you follow it with an opinion. My logic is speculative, but yours voids all accountability and impact of any action on the possibility of terrorism, which is asinine.