[Videocardz]First GTX Titan X 3DMark benchmarks!

[ocre]

9438!!!

That is way better than the OP. what is going on here? Is the OP results bogus? Or is this one bogus?

When are the reviews supposed to hit? I wonder how the Titan X can be that much faster, it runs at lower clocks than the 980. 135% gtx980 performance should be about right for a Titan X at stock clocks.

What I think wil make it even more special is overclocking. I bet we will see overclocking as high as 40% over its default clocks. The performance improvements depend on how high the stock Titan X boost right out of the box.

 

[Lepton87]

Looks about right for the 3dMark (graphics) results. ~35% in that, and ~33% in games on average.

116 x 1.33 = 154

As i posted, NV reusing the titan blower is fine but that blower drops off significantly when TDP is higher than 225, as seen in Titan Black where it already gets noisy & hot. If NV push clocks on Titan X to get 50% above 980 (170W x 1.5 = 255W), they're looking at >250W and that blower just isn't capable to remain cool & quiet.

But it should have the OC headroom to allow enthusiasts to manually crank up the blower or put it on water.

No it's not fine on a card that cost a 1000$ or more. That cooler is crap, replacing those crappy coolers got me about a 50C reduction in the temperature. Overclocking a GK110 is too much for that cooler. AMD is right to include liquid coolers on its top cards but there should also be a version available with just an FC block for folks with custom loops.

 

[Techhog]

Does it need to catch the Titan X? As long as it beats the 980 I expect it to be priced between $500-$700. I'd like AMD to get the performance crown for competitions sake, but it'd still be the second fastest GPU for hundreds less than the fastest.

This.

If it can hit 85-90% of the performance for roughly half the price, it will be 390X-CF vs. Titan X at a similar price. Guessing the 390X will win that.

So then the $800 980 Ti/1080 comes out and wrecks it? Yeah, that's good for competition...

 

[Silverforce11]

No it's not fine on a card that cost a 1000$ or more. That cooler is crap, replacing those crappy coolers got me about a 50C reduction in the temperature. Overclocking a GK110 is too much for that cooler. AMD is right to include liquid coolers on its top cards but there should also be a version available with just an FC block for folks with custom loops.

It's going to be a repeat of the first Titan, similar performance gap to the 680 at $1000, you bought 2! Why is it not fine now?