Video showing Mac OS X booting on an x86 machine

Eug

Lifer
Mar 11, 2000
24,163
1,807
126
Not fully cracked yet. You apparently have to apply a bunch of patches, and after that, you only get limited functionality. Furthermore, it seems to work a lot better on certain hardware than others.

But still it's not bad considering this is a developer preview version supposedly built for only one machine.
 

wakawaka

Senior member
Jan 30, 2005
266
0
0
Originally posted by: Eug
Not fully cracked yet. You apparently have to apply a bunch of patches, and after that, you only get limited functionality. Furthermore, it seems to work a lot better on certain hardware than others.

But still it's not bad considering this is a developer preview version supposedly built for only one machine.

http://wiki.osx86project.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page says:

"August 10, 2005 - We have recieved unconfirmed reports that a torrent has leaked containing a VMWare image of Tiger x86 that has supposedly been hacked to circumvent TPM and run on non-SSE3 machines. More news as it happens..."

I have to find that torrent! :p If anyone figuresd out where it is, toss me a message. ;)
 

wakawaka

Senior member
Jan 30, 2005
266
0
0
Well, that didn't take long to find. 8 hours or so until testing begins. Hopefully this sucker isn't fake.
 

Eug

Lifer
Mar 11, 2000
24,163
1,807
126
Originally posted by: wkinney
link seems dead, any mirrors?
Hmmm... Yeah, the link seems dead now. I downloaded it but it's on my work computer and I'm now at home. (I'm not keen on hosting it anyway, as it would kill my bandwidth.)

Anyways... Cliff notes:

It's somebody holding a DV camera in front of their PC laptop and then booting it up.

It boots to the normal PC laptop POST screens etc, then to the Apple grey startup screen, and then into OS X. At initial boot up it shows a dialogue box saying that a few things couldn't be loaded properly, but OS X does otherwise load seemingly pretty normally.
 

Eug

Lifer
Mar 11, 2000
24,163
1,807
126
Hmmm... A second video was added, but their site is getting hammered. Apparently it shows them displaying stuff like:

"the "About this Mac" panel, Apple System Profiler and CHUD prefpane showing information on the processor (frequency, cache etc...)."
 

timswim78

Diamond Member
Jan 1, 2003
4,330
1
81

wakawaka

Senior member
Jan 30, 2005
266
0
0
Up and running in VMware.....Too dang slow to accomplish anything, but they say out of VMware its fine. Soooo...now to get it up and going without VMware. To be continued tomorrow....
 

yukichigai

Diamond Member
Apr 23, 2003
6,404
0
76
The process looks far too complex for me to follow at the moment. I'll wait until the hack becomes a little more straightforward before I triple-boot Tiger, XP x64 and Mandriva x64 :p
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: wakawaka
Up and running in VMware.....Too dang slow to accomplish anything, but they say out of VMware its fine. Soooo...now to get it up and going without VMware. To be continued tomorrow....

Why pirate Mac OS X? It's much cheaper than Windows, you shouldn't have to pirate it.
 

timswim78

Diamond Member
Jan 1, 2003
4,330
1
81
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: wakawaka
Up and running in VMware.....Too dang slow to accomplish anything, but they say out of VMware its fine. Soooo...now to get it up and going without VMware. To be continued tomorrow....

Why pirate Mac OS X? It's much cheaper than Windows, you shouldn't have to pirate it.

I'm missing where he said that he pirated it...
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: timswim78
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: wakawaka
Up and running in VMware.....Too dang slow to accomplish anything, but they say out of VMware its fine. Soooo...now to get it up and going without VMware. To be continued tomorrow....

Why pirate Mac OS X? It's much cheaper than Windows, you shouldn't have to pirate it.

I'm missing where he said that he pirated it...

There is no version of OS X for VMWare commonly available to the public.

I have to find that torrent! If anyone figuresd out where it is, toss me a message.

Well, that didn't take long to find. 8 hours or so until testing begins. Hopefully this sucker isn't fake.
 

timswim78

Diamond Member
Jan 1, 2003
4,330
1
81
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: timswim78
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: wakawaka
Up and running in VMware.....Too dang slow to accomplish anything, but they say out of VMware its fine. Soooo...now to get it up and going without VMware. To be continued tomorrow....

Why pirate Mac OS X? It's much cheaper than Windows, you shouldn't have to pirate it.

I'm missing where he said that he pirated it...

There is no version of OS X for VMWare commonly available to the public.



I got ye now. I thought that VMWARE was designed to run everything.
 

BladeVenom

Lifer
Jun 2, 2005
13,365
16
0
Apple is going to try to lock out any non-Apple computer from running OS X. Pirated versions will be the only ones that will work.
 

wkinney

Senior member
Dec 10, 2004
268
0
0
Why are they locking it to apple specific hardware when they release it? The amount of money they would make in licensing the software on all x86 platforms would so much more than any money they will get from hardware sales of their systems.

The whole world did not switch to apple hardware for their osx before, why would they now? because intel will give them faster machines? I don't think so.
 

Bowsky

Member
Dec 23, 2004
74
0
0
www.math.umd.edu
By releasing the OS on Apple specific hardware they are able to maintain the "Apple Experience". The will know all the given hardware combinations which will give coders an edge when trying to optimize the OS and keep it stable. The minute Apple opens their OS to the general computing world they have to deal with a large amount of hardware that has the potential to act abnormally and crash (via bad drivers).

Luckily for all of us it seems clear that there will be a work around for anyone who wants OS X running on a non-Mac box.
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: wkinney
Why are they locking it to apple specific hardware when they release it? The amount of money they would make in licensing the software on all x86 platforms would so much more than any money they will get from hardware sales of their systems.

The whole world did not switch to apple hardware for their osx before, why would they now? because intel will give them faster machines? I don't think so.

Because we don't want to spend $500 on the OS alone.
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: BladeVenom
Apple is going to try to lock out any non-Apple computer from running OS X. Pirated versions will be the only ones that will work.

Use Apple hardware. It's a simpler solution.
 

wkinney

Senior member
Dec 10, 2004
268
0
0
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: wkinney
Why are they locking it to apple specific hardware when they release it? The amount of money they would make in licensing the software on all x86 platforms would so much more than any money they will get from hardware sales of their systems.

The whole world did not switch to apple hardware for their osx before, why would they now? because intel will give them faster machines? I don't think so.

Because we don't want to spend $500 on the OS alone.


Uhm its $129 right now, why would it be 500 dollars?
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: wkinney
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: wkinney
Why are they locking it to apple specific hardware when they release it? The amount of money they would make in licensing the software on all x86 platforms would so much more than any money they will get from hardware sales of their systems.

The whole world did not switch to apple hardware for their osx before, why would they now? because intel will give them faster machines? I don't think so.

Because we don't want to spend $500 on the OS alone.


Uhm its $129 right now, why would it be 500 dollars?

Because they wouldn't be making money off of hardware like they do now. Their profit margins would fall, and they'd have to raise the price of the software.
 

drag

Elite Member
Jul 4, 2002
8,708
0
0
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: wkinney
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: wkinney
Why are they locking it to apple specific hardware when they release it? The amount of money they would make in licensing the software on all x86 platforms would so much more than any money they will get from hardware sales of their systems.

The whole world did not switch to apple hardware for their osx before, why would they now? because intel will give them faster machines? I don't think so.

Because we don't want to spend $500 on the OS alone.


Uhm its $129 right now, why would it be 500 dollars?

Because they wouldn't be making money off of hardware like they do now. Their profit margins would fall, and they'd have to raise the price of the software.


Exactly. That amount that Apple sells OS X at is just for the cost of media and probably partially covers support costs caused by people needing help upgrading.

If they gave it away for no-cost to apple users then people would assume that it ment that they could pirate it legally.

All the profits are from hardware sales.. not software. Nobody but Microsoft and Redhat has been able to successfully sell a OS for money as a for-profit corporation.. All other current OS's are sold with expensive hardware and support contracts.. everybody else has killed off the OS (like IBM on OS/2) or gone out of business (BeOS).

If Apple ends up selling their OS for everybody to use on their random machines it would be at least 300 dollars... and Apple's hardware support is going to be crap for a long time.
 

timswim78

Diamond Member
Jan 1, 2003
4,330
1
81
With regards to the whol security issue, I wonder what is going on at Apple. Are they worried about this OS X version being "cracked," or are they sitting around and laughing because they have not yet released their more secure version?