- Aug 4, 2007
- 16,809
- 13
- 0
Jay walking is against the law, as obstacles in the roadway, they provided a deadly threat to the officer if he was to swerve. The police need to live above anyone else, he had to run them over, or risk spinning out and injuring himself and whomever was in the car.
What?
Did you watch the video?
This is old news, you can see the video is dated 2009.
Yes, I believe they were racing.
I have a text only browser.
This all looks like an elaborate version of an old-old school RPG.
Videos are for simpletons, use your imagination, it leads to more fun.
What?
Did you watch the video?
94 in a 40, speeding through what is essentially a stop sign (blinking red light), and killing two teenagers, pleading not guilty despite the video evidence.
They were in a car..
94 in a 40, speeding through what is essentially a stop sign (blinking red light), and killing two teenagers, pleading not guilty despite the video evidence.
Scumbag. Hope he gets the maximum, which my Googling tells me would be 10 years per charge.
Oh, that's fucked up. If the police were doing something, they still have the "right of way" even if they were un-lit. They could have been doing that to catch up with a suspect inconspicuously, which I think gives them the right of way in some circumstances, especially if a car was turning.
I'll refrain from further unrestrained comment, my bad.
hmm...didnt see that earlier. oh well, new to me and i'm sure new to you.
nope. he will get off since he was running silent to a call or some other bullshit.
He was not responding to a call, he was returning back to the station. State Law requires them to obey posted speed limits if the sirens and lights are off if they're no pursuing an incident.
Also, he was fired.
Oh, that's fucked up. If the police were doing something, they still have the "right of way" even if they were un-lit. They could have been doing that to catch up with a suspect inconspicuously, which I think gives them the right of way in some circumstances, especially if a car was turning.
I'll refrain from further unrestrained comment, my bad.
Oh, that's fucked up. If the police were doing something, they still have the "right of way" even if they were un-lit. They could have been doing that to catch up with a suspect inconspicuously, which I think gives them the right of way in some circumstances, especially if a car was turning.
I'll refrain from further unrestrained comment, my bad.
The cop had the right of way because the light facing him was blinking yellow, not because he was a cop. The car that got hit would have had a blinking red (i.e. stop sign).