- Jul 12, 2001
- 77
- 0
- 0
Morning All,
I'm wondering, about overclocking my GF3 Ti200 ... its 175/400 at default .. so my question is an odd one and slightly confusing :
If I say oc'd it to .. would getting the core or mem higher be a better overclock? For instance. ..
210/421 vs 210/450 I mean are those going to be a vast difference? If the core stalls out at say ... 220 ... should I keep tinkering with the mem until it too stalls out or crashes or whatever? Is there some sort of number range I should keep between the two?
Editied Add: I guess also, which gives a better performance increase as well mem or core increase?
Hope I explained it right
Thanks in advance ..
I'm wondering, about overclocking my GF3 Ti200 ... its 175/400 at default .. so my question is an odd one and slightly confusing :
If I say oc'd it to .. would getting the core or mem higher be a better overclock? For instance. ..
210/421 vs 210/450 I mean are those going to be a vast difference? If the core stalls out at say ... 220 ... should I keep tinkering with the mem until it too stalls out or crashes or whatever? Is there some sort of number range I should keep between the two?
Editied Add: I guess also, which gives a better performance increase as well mem or core increase?
Hope I explained it right