"Video Is a Window Into a Terror Suspect?s Isolation"

uberman

Golden Member
Sep 15, 2006
1,942
1
81
By DEBORAH SONTAG
Published: December 4, 2006
One spring day during his three and a half years as an enemy combatant, Jose Padilla experienced a break from the monotony of his solitary confinement in a bare cell in the brig at the Naval Weapons Station in Charleston, S.C.

In the videotape, Mr. Padilla's feet were shackled.
That day, Mr. Padilla, a Brooklyn-born Muslim convert whom the Bush administration had accused of plotting a dirty bomb attack and had detained without charges, got to go to the dentist.

?Today is May 21,? a naval official declared to a camera videotaping the event. ?Right now we?re ready to do a root canal treatment on Jose Padilla, our enemy combatant.?

Several guards in camouflage and riot gear approached cell No. 103. They unlocked a rectangular panel at the bottom of the door and Mr. Padilla?s bare feet slid through, eerily disembodied. As one guard held down a foot with his black boot, the others shackled Mr. Padilla?s legs. Next, his hands emerged through another hole to be manacled.

Wordlessly, the guards, pushing into the cell, chained Mr. Padilla?s cuffed hands to a metal belt. Briefly, his expressionless eyes met the camera before he lowered his head submissively in expectation of what came next: noise-blocking headphones over his ears and blacked-out goggles over his eyes. Then the guards, whose faces were hidden behind plastic visors, marched their masked, clanking prisoner down the hall to his root canal.

The videotape of that trip to the dentist, which was recently released to Mr. Padilla?s lawyers and viewed by The New York Times, offers the first concrete glimpse inside the secretive military incarceration of an American citizen whose detention without charges became a test case of President Bush?s powers in the fight against terror. Still frames from the videotape were posted in Mr. Padilla?s electronic court file late Friday.

To Mr. Padilla?s lawyers, the pictures capture the dehumanization of their client during his military detention from mid-2002 until earlier this year, when the government changed his status from enemy combatant to criminal defendant and transferred him to the federal detention center in Miami. He now awaits trial scheduled for late January.

Together with other documents filed late Friday, the images represent the latest and most aggressive sally by defense lawyers who declared this fall that charges against Mr. Padilla should be dismissed for ?outrageous government conduct,? saying that he was mistreated and tortured during his years as an enemy combatant.

Now lawyers for Mr. Padilla, 36, suggest that he is unfit to stand trial. They argue that he has been so damaged by his interrogations and prolonged isolation that he suffers post-traumatic stress disorder and is unable to assist in his own defense. His interrogations, they say, included hooding, stress positions, assaults, threats of imminent execution and the administration of ?truth serums.?

A Pentagon spokesman, Lt. Col. Todd Vician, said Sunday that the military disputes Mr. Padilla?s accusations of mistreatment. And, in court papers, prosecutors deny ?in the strongest terms? the accusations of torture and say that ?Padilla?s conditions of confinement were humane and designed to ensure his safety and security.?

?His basic needs were met in a conscientious manner, including Halal (Muslim acceptable) food, clothing, sleep and daily medical assessment and treatment when necessary,? the government stated. ?While in the brig, Padilla never reported any abusive treatment to the staff or medical personnel.?

In the brig, Mr. Padilla was denied access to counsel for 21 months. Andrew Patel, one of his lawyers, said his isolation was not only severe but compounded by material and sensory deprivations. In an affidavit filed Friday, he alleged that Mr. Padilla was held alone in a 10-cell wing of the brig; that he had little human contact other than with his interrogators; that his cell was electronically monitored and his meals were passed to him through a slot in the door; that windows were blackened, and there was no clock or calendar; and that he slept on a steel platform after a foam mattress was taken from him, along with his copy of the Koran, ?as part of an interrogation plan.?


Do they really need to cover his ears, eyes, and wear riot shields to take a fully restrained prisoner to the dentist? Isn't this isolation treatment just a form of torture to break an American citizen to please his interrogaters? Does he even know he's going to the dentist?

New York Times Article
 

chrisms

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2003
6,615
0
0
This is a really odd case. On one hand the government is overstepping its bounds, on the other it hasn't really done this to any other Americans which makes me think they have a good case against him. Why would they randomly arrest some thug in Chicago? I'm sure one day if the truth comes out it'll be interesting.

With that said this probably should be in P&N.
 

uberman

Golden Member
Sep 15, 2006
1,942
1
81
I believe he's going to trial soon in Florida. At the trial they will not be able to discuss the conditions under which he has been held because the jury might get to upset with this.
 

chrisms

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2003
6,615
0
0
I think its completely wrong to hold an American citizen like this and am against his detention. All I am saying is that there is probably more to this case than we know because why would the administration deal with the political fallout of this just to arrest some random kid. It would make more sense if the person had been in some position of power or something, but because he wasn't I don't sense any mass government conspiracy.
 

uberman

Golden Member
Sep 15, 2006
1,942
1
81
Originally posted by: JS80
why isn't he executed already for treason?

A better question might be why he hasn't had a trial like the Walker Lind guy from Marin who was found fighting alongside the Taliban?

 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Meh, if you break him psychologically he'll talk.

I see this as a good thing. Gotta get him to talk somehow. Let's hope it works. If you keep subjecting him to this kind of stress he'll eventually break down and sing like a canary.

-edit-
And why hasn't the New York Times brought up on treason charges yet? This I don't understand.
 

AnthroAndStargate

Golden Member
Oct 7, 2005
1,350
0
0
Originally posted by: JS80
why isn't he executed already for treason?

Should things spiral out of control and become more like a police state - it will be ironic if they come for you first, patriot.

Originally posted by: spidey07
Meh, if you break him psychologically he'll talk.

I see this as a good thing. Gotta get him to talk somehow. Let's hope it works. If you keep subjecting him to this kind of stress he'll eventually break down and sing like a canary.

-edit-
And why hasn't the New York Times brought up on treason charges yet? This I don't understand.

I am sorry - do you have evidence that we dont that he has been proven to be a terrorist? Just what the administration said. The reason the NYT isn't brought up on treason charges is because they are one of the last institutions trying to protect the things people like my grandfathers fought for against Hitler and the fascist - freedom from this kind of bullshit.

It sickens me that people like you are willing to use our freedoms as toilet paper. We did this to the Japanese in WWII - and then it turns out that none of the people imprisoned were the dark, insidious spies we all feared they were. Perhaps this is a repeat of history?
 

wetcat007

Diamond Member
Nov 5, 2002
3,502
0
0
Originally posted by: AnthroAndStargate
Originally posted by: JS80
why isn't he executed already for treason?

Should things spiral out of control and become more like a police state - it will be ironic if they come for you first, patriot.

Originally posted by: spidey07
Meh, if you break him psychologically he'll talk.

I see this as a good thing. Gotta get him to talk somehow. Let's hope it works. If you keep subjecting him to this kind of stress he'll eventually break down and sing like a canary.

-edit-
And why hasn't the New York Times brought up on treason charges yet? This I don't understand.

I am sorry - do you have evidence that we dont that he has been proven to be a terrorist? Just what the administration said. The reason the NYT isn't brought up on treason charges is because they are one of the last institutions trying to protect the things people like my grandfathers fought for against Hitler and the fascist - freedom from this kind of bullshit.

It sickens me that people like you are willing to use our freedoms as toilet paper. We did this to the Japanese in WWII - and then it turns out that none of the people imprisoned were the dark, insidious spies we all feared they were. Perhaps this is a repeat of history?

I think he was be sarcastic although I'm not sure.....
 

Atheus

Diamond Member
Jun 7, 2005
7,313
2
0
Originally posted by: JS80
why isn't he executed already for treason?

No trial = no treason = no execution.

Originally posted by: spidey07
And why hasn't the New York Times brought up on treason charges yet? This I don't understand.

LOL.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: wetcat007
I think he was be sarcastic although I'm not sure.....

Not sarcastic. You have to break these people and make them talk by whatever means necessary.

On top of that the treasonous activity by the NYTs needs some serious investigation. They've already sunk many ships with their loose lips.

 

Atheus

Diamond Member
Jun 7, 2005
7,313
2
0
Originally posted by: spidey07
On top of that the treasonous activity by the NYTs needs some serious investigation. They've already sunk many ships with their loose lips.

What have they done that is treasonous?
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: Atheus
Originally posted by: spidey07
On top of that the treasonous activity by the NYTs needs some serious investigation. They've already sunk many ships with their loose lips.

What have they done that is treasonous?

multiple instances of classified information.
 

Atheus

Diamond Member
Jun 7, 2005
7,313
2
0
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Atheus
Originally posted by: spidey07
On top of that the treasonous activity by the NYTs needs some serious investigation. They've already sunk many ships with their loose lips.

What have they done that is treasonous?

multiple instances of classified information.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
 

Ronstang

Lifer
Jul 8, 2000
12,493
18
81
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Atheus
Originally posted by: spidey07
On top of that the treasonous activity by the NYTs needs some serious investigation. They've already sunk many ships with their loose lips.

What have they done that is treasonous?

multiple instances of classified information.

Trying to explain this to a liberal is a waste of time. They probably still won't understand when a nuclear bomb takes out a major US city......they will blame that on us too.
 

Atheus

Diamond Member
Jun 7, 2005
7,313
2
0
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Atheus
Originally posted by: spidey07
On top of that the treasonous activity by the NYTs needs some serious investigation. They've already sunk many ships with their loose lips.

What have they done that is treasonous?

multiple instances of classified information.

Trying to explain this to a liberal is a waste of time. They probably still won't understand when a nuclear bomb takes out a major US city......they will blame that on us too.

Oh go on, try! I would love to have this explained to me - seriously.

Not that I define myself as a liberal.