It amazes me when people defend the police shooting people when they didnt need to be shot. Especially in these two cases where the police gave literally no time for victims to react.
I'm just wondering when the police stopped trying to talk to the people first. "You are surrounded, put the gun down." Back in the 90's people could sit out on a lawn chair in the middle of an intersection with a revolver and the worse they got was a sniper shooting the gun out of their hand. These days, the first cop on the scene would just run over the guy at 90mph.
I guess I don't understand the gungho nature of the police force. No one was around the kid, he wasn't holding a hostage. No need to blaze in and gun him down. Its best to try to establish contact and try to end it peacefully. I'm sure the kid probably would have put down the BB gun if given a chance when confronted by armed police.
I guess some people were never taught to never display a weapon in a threatening manner as it will be considered such by the police. My father taught me that when I got my bb gun in 1966.
The police received a 911 call reporting a person was brandishing a weapon in the Walmart. The person turned towards the police gun still in hand. Had he left the gun in the sporting goods department in it's box this chances of him being shot would be very slim to not at all.
Kid that was shot within 2 seconds had been previously pointing the pistol in a threatening manner at people prior to the police arriving, he also chose not to raise his arms as directed and began moving his hands towards the gun which was at his waist.
I know you are dishonest person, but repeating a lie doesn't make it true.
The amount of time Crawford had from "Put the gun down" and being shot was less then a second. The amount of time your heroes waited before murdering a 12 year old was the same. Hell, they shot him from inside the car.
Back 30 or 40 years ago the police didn't have to worry about gangbangers (shooting someone as part of initiation) or people who have no qualms with shooting anyone including a police officer. Back then it was not uncommon to go to a high school parking lot during hunting season and see guns in a window rack of a pickup truck or in a car trunk. No one ever thought of shooting up a school or randomly shooting a person, that is not the case today.
Establishing a calmer, safer protocol than just immediately shooting, when no threats have been made, no shots fired. Sounds better for avoiding wrongful deaths.
I know you are dishonest person, but repeating a lie doesn't make it true.
The amount of time Crawford had from "Put the gun down" and being shot was less then a second. The amount of time your heroes waited before murdering a 12 year old was the same. Hell, they shot him from inside the car.
30-40 years ago the chances of gang bangers shooting and other violent crime was much higher.
30-40 years ago the chances of gang bangers shooting and other violent crime was much higher.
Not in small town/cities or rural areas. That's not the case these days.
WTF are you talking about? 30-40 years ago it was way worse out there and the pigs didnt shoot before warning. Look up history. 30-40 hell even 50 years ago shools were shot up.
So are you saying the police car did not have a PA system? I haven't seen one since the 70's that wasn't equipped with one.
The guy was a idiot for picking that gun up, BB gun or not. Wtf did he not think that someone may think its real and then call the cops ? Darwin award right there.
Also watch the OTHER people in the video and how they react when they see him with a gun, none of them think its "cute" and "sweet", no they haul ass asap. And the cops thought it was real, how would they not think that ? They didnt view the tape until after the fact.
Darwin award has his name on it.
by brandish you mean point at floor and walk around?
again the guy who called 911 lied about what crawford was actually doing with the gun.
cops see a black guy with gun in open carry state and then kill in cold blood.
There definitely were gangs in the 80s and there definitely were gang shooting.
To me the problem is Police Departments keep hiring former Military guys. Currently there is too narrow life experiences to round out departments.
The Army always says they should not be used as a police force, its not what they do. Why does it make sense to constantly hire former Military to be Police?
WTF are you talking about? 30-40 years ago it was way worse out there and the pigs didnt shoot before warning. Look up history. 30-40 hell even 50 years ago shools were shot up.
I know its purely anecdotal but I have heard from numerous people that police officers that are also reservists were the real "cowboys" when deployed. The regular military guys hated working with them because they put everyone else in danger and had a huge "shoot first and figure out if shooting needed to happen later" mentality.
Real .mil guys are trained, usually VERY well, to follow orders. I wonder if there has ever been a study on how many citations/complaints ex-mil cops receive versus regular cops? It would be an interesting read.
Does anyone here want to discuss the thread topic and the shit treatment of this guy's grieving girlfriend? We already have a rather large thread discussing the initial shooting. Or are we going to let the cops on ATPN hijack the discussion?
