- Jan 14, 2011
- 3
- 0
- 0
1. video editing and audio mixing.
2. about $1000.
3. USA
4. i have an unscientific feeling that intel is more reliable and compatible than amd since i had issues with an amd build 6 years ago. but, i'm sure i could be convinced of the error in this.
5. 2 wd 1tb black hard drives and an m audio delta 44 (legacy pci) are the only things i will almost definitely use again--unless someone has a better idea for recording multiple tracks to computer.
here are some parts in my current computer that i could use again, but don't mind replacing:
-seasonc ss500ht psu.
-antec lanboy aluminum (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16811129145) is pretty beat up/bent up and things don't really latch so well anymore, but if it saves me money that can be better spend elsewhere, i'd use it again (i can't believe how much good cases cost).
-wd raptor 740. 4 years old but still going strong.
6. i haven't built a computer for about 5 years, so i've been reading to catch myself up on everything.
7. i don't plan on overclocking.
8. sometimes, when i can't sleep, i play no one lives forever 2...or the original empire earth. other soporific game suggestions welcome.
9. in the next month or so. some friends and i will be shooting some video in that time that i'd like to have a better computer to edit on by march.
here's a little background. i'm currently on a p4 2.8ghz system i built in 2006 for about the same purposes. it's served me well but i had some ram go bad, replaced it, and the new ram is now acting up, so i wonder about the mb.
i'll splurge if i think it will really affect quality (such as with a camera). that's why i came here--i'm not sure how much difference certain things will make--the p4 doesn't encode at light speed, but i can set it to go and get some dinner. so, here are some specific questions:
cpu: i've read the 6 core amd may be better for video editing, but that suggestion may predate the sandy bridge processors. if i go with sb, does anyone think i'll get much of a boost out of the i7 over the i5? or does anyone vote for the amd?
hds: i bought that wd raptor to speed things up 4 years ago, and i felt like i noticed the difference. i'm thinking about an SSD, but i'm not sure if the performance would be that much better than the big drives of today for my purposes.
ram: my sense if 4 gigs of g.skill ddr 3 1600 will be fine. it seems like the slowest timing, 9-9-9-24 is fine, but it's not that much more to bump it up (down) if it would add any performance.
gpu and mb: here's one of my big questions. would it be cost effective to save the money on a graphics card and use the on-board video with an h67 mb? i would like to use two monitors, so maybe on-board won't work for this setup.
again, i should try to stick around $1000 budget wise, so i'd like to spend the money where it counts. if i can save on the case, or no gpu, and use the money more effectively elsewhere, i'll do it and buy those things later. that said, i would prefer a quiet machine, and any case recommendations are welcome. thanks!
2. about $1000.
3. USA
4. i have an unscientific feeling that intel is more reliable and compatible than amd since i had issues with an amd build 6 years ago. but, i'm sure i could be convinced of the error in this.
5. 2 wd 1tb black hard drives and an m audio delta 44 (legacy pci) are the only things i will almost definitely use again--unless someone has a better idea for recording multiple tracks to computer.
here are some parts in my current computer that i could use again, but don't mind replacing:
-seasonc ss500ht psu.
-antec lanboy aluminum (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16811129145) is pretty beat up/bent up and things don't really latch so well anymore, but if it saves me money that can be better spend elsewhere, i'd use it again (i can't believe how much good cases cost).
-wd raptor 740. 4 years old but still going strong.
6. i haven't built a computer for about 5 years, so i've been reading to catch myself up on everything.
7. i don't plan on overclocking.
8. sometimes, when i can't sleep, i play no one lives forever 2...or the original empire earth. other soporific game suggestions welcome.
9. in the next month or so. some friends and i will be shooting some video in that time that i'd like to have a better computer to edit on by march.
here's a little background. i'm currently on a p4 2.8ghz system i built in 2006 for about the same purposes. it's served me well but i had some ram go bad, replaced it, and the new ram is now acting up, so i wonder about the mb.
i'll splurge if i think it will really affect quality (such as with a camera). that's why i came here--i'm not sure how much difference certain things will make--the p4 doesn't encode at light speed, but i can set it to go and get some dinner. so, here are some specific questions:
cpu: i've read the 6 core amd may be better for video editing, but that suggestion may predate the sandy bridge processors. if i go with sb, does anyone think i'll get much of a boost out of the i7 over the i5? or does anyone vote for the amd?
hds: i bought that wd raptor to speed things up 4 years ago, and i felt like i noticed the difference. i'm thinking about an SSD, but i'm not sure if the performance would be that much better than the big drives of today for my purposes.
ram: my sense if 4 gigs of g.skill ddr 3 1600 will be fine. it seems like the slowest timing, 9-9-9-24 is fine, but it's not that much more to bump it up (down) if it would add any performance.
gpu and mb: here's one of my big questions. would it be cost effective to save the money on a graphics card and use the on-board video with an h67 mb? i would like to use two monitors, so maybe on-board won't work for this setup.
again, i should try to stick around $1000 budget wise, so i'd like to spend the money where it counts. if i can save on the case, or no gpu, and use the money more effectively elsewhere, i'll do it and buy those things later. that said, i would prefer a quiet machine, and any case recommendations are welcome. thanks!
