• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Video card hype

ravedave

Senior member
I'm just noticing how well my TNT2 Ultra still does. I can play any game I want a decent res (mostly 1024x..but sometimes 800x...) and get a playable frame rate. I have noticed that you can make games look prettier, but is that really worth $150 of my cash??
Unless i wanna play unreal 2 that is... I was noticing some of the horrible frame rates for gf2 Mx's (11FPs at 8x6!!!!)

What do you think?
I'm on a duron now, should I upgrade to a Ath 1.3 or go for a GF 2 ti200??
The ath is lookign like a better decision...



 
Do you have ANY of the prettiness enabled in any of your games? What do you define as a "playable" frame rate? For some people, anything under 60 makes them think there's a problem with their computer.

While there is hype about new products of course, a lot of it isn't just hype. While your TNT2 Ultra can play current games at an "acceptable" quality and speed, it can't compete with say, a GF3, where one could turn on all the graphics features and still get far more than "playable" framerates. TNT2 Ultra actually does quite well in a lot of things still, but when you start going for the higher-end games it can't compete anymore.

It all depends on what you want out of games. It's up to YOU whether the higher quality graphics are worth your money. In order to keep the speed up and enable all those things, you have to upgrade to hardware that can handle it.

Suggestion: just say what speeds and relevant hardware you have, it's an annoyance having to click through to look at your AT rig.

If I had your stuff and wanted to start turning on features in games I'd get a new video card. The TNT2 just plain doesn't support some things, so you either can't use them or you have to make your CPU handle it. A new vid card would both allow you to use the features while keeping the framerate up, without taxing the CPU.

If you want to see an overall improvement in your system, not just in games, then the new processor would be the better bet.

Of course, you could get the best of both worlds. A Geforce2 Pro costs a bit less than a GF2 Titanium (Ti200 is only the GF3) but is essentially the same product, and you could also get say a 1.13 or 1GHz t-bird and overclock it. (Also VisionTek makes a GF2 GTS-V chipset video card, which is clocked slightly slower but costs nearly half as much as a GF2 Pro, and can probably be overclocked as well to at least full GTS speed if not higher.)
 
I still use a Matrox G400 graphics card - still runs every game I throw at it at decent speeds in 1024x768 with medium/high detail options. Saying that I have an Athlon 1.4@1.53Ghz processor to back it up.

I don't intend to upgrade the card until after Unreal 2 comes out.

If I were you I'd buy the best CPU you can afford now and get a new graphics card in a couple of months time - the GeForce4 will push the price down on the GeForce3s for sure, once its released.
 
There is that issue, definitely. If you think you'll be able to have the money for a card in a couple of months, then just get the best CPU you can. A 1.3GHz Athlon isn't going to suddenly seem slow and isn't going to suddenly become cheap because of a huge technology change, but the video card probably will. The GF4 is all I'm waiting for so I can get a GF3 for cheap.

I would suggest getting an XP though if possible. Only 9 dollars more for an XP at 1.33GHz on newegg, and for that you get a cooler running processor with SSE support. High-speed t-birds are hardly worth buying anymore. (I assume ABIT made a BIOS compatible with the XP, I haven't kept up with them.)

And of course, if you're happy with average frame-rates and don't need high quality graphics, then when the GF4 comes out, GF2's will probably be damn cheap.
 


<< I have noticed that you can make games look prettier, but is that really worth $150 of my cash?? >>



Maybe not, but there are $50 cards that will make that TNT2 ultra look like dogsbutt, thats the real benefit of highly priced/highly performing cards. Slightly less perforrming cards can be had at bargain prices.
 
Back
Top